Saudi Arabia: If war is imposed upon us, we are its men

[Wilhelm II]

when mobarak at egypt fall the first one who visited egypt was general soleimani, we supported morsi government and ikhwan al muslimin. the shia country who refused us was azarbaijan rep, they feared that we gonna reannex them and they did want secularism so we abandond them, while we supported bosnian sunnis against serbs.
it's not the islamic republic that is sectarian, it's people who are sectarian. naturally shias join us while sunnis are reluctant.

Can you prove it? Why Iranians make an idol of suleimani?

Lol

The Saudis can’t fight to save their lives.....their life is fast cars, 4 wives and dancing with swords

Empty words future is ours

 

[Mithridates]

Can you prove it? Why Iranians make an idol of suleimani?

prove what??

 

[Wilhelm II]

prove what??

Suleimani visit of Egypt

 

[Mithridates]

Suleimani visit of Egypt

he himself said in an interview.

 

[925boy]

If Saudis were real men they would have been able to deal with the Houthis especially with all there fancy U.S made arms that the Saudis posses!

LMAO. Houthis are still waiting for them to deploy real balls in their soldiers and send the 20K soldiers needed to squash the Houthis into Yemen. smh. half a*s military work by Saudis.

But it looks like Saudis are fighting just like the Americans- bomb everyday with your F-ghost-on-radar planes and fight forever.

 

[925boy]

There are no other Shia' countries other than Iran..and BTW, Iran got involved in..be it, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon or Yemen only when there were civil wars..It seems to always be opportunistic and fill voids or gaps caused by wars so it is not about liking Iran..It is more like infiltration at vulnerable moments and making a place for oneself where he did not belong..the proof is that Iran couldn't infiltrate any country that was not at war.. mostly civil wars..

You're correct, but dont hate because their tactics were effective.

 

[The SC]

You're correct, but dont hate because their tactics were effective.

Where do you see hate in my post? The truth is they are negatively opportunists..and the region does not like that..I might say even others outside of the ME but who have vital interests in it..

when mobarak at egypt fall the first one who visited egypt was general soleimani, we supported morsi government and ikhwan al muslimin. the shia country who refused us was azarbaijan rep, they feared that we gonna reannex them and they did want secularism so we abandond them, while we supported bosnian sunnis against serbs.
it's not the islamic republic that is sectarian, it's people who are sectarian. naturally shias join us while sunnis are reluctant.

Join you in what.. it was better to keep the revolution inside Iran ..and then lead by example if it would have succeeded.. not to force the ideology on others..and Muslims at that.. imagine Sunnis forcefully trying to convert Shia' to Sunnis.. how would Iran feel about that?
Now you know a little bit why Morsi was ousted..

Whole game is to make the Arabs and Iranians fight, the old divide and rule game, so simple and blatant it is laughable. With each tension and conflagration the military presence is increased and will change from protection to occupation. We are here to protect you soon changes to we are here to occupy you. The rulers soon start dancing to colonial tunes and before you know it they become a colony!

WOW..sorry too far fetched theory..Again..but I like what you are smoking
Is it the same for India and Pakistan? China and Taiwan? North and South korea? Yes and no..it is ambivalent.. So the first half of your post might be true, the second half is very far fetched..

 

[Aramagedon]

Made my month, UNLIMITED ROLFs

Saudis are only good at killing innocent muslims and destroying Islamic countries.

 

[KAL-EL]

Lol

their life is fast cars, 4 wives and dancing with swords

If true, quite an interesting life..

 

[The SC]

Lol

The Saudis can’t fight to save their lives.....their life is fast cars, 4 wives and dancing with swords

If that makes you feel better.. it is ok..
That was a bit true for some Saudis in the 70s..but things have changed a lot in 80s onward..

 

[Aramagedon]

If true, quite an interesting life..

A family called Saudi (named the country after their family) with full support of west is parasitizing a country for God knows decades and make jahiliya, sectarianism, war and bloodshed in other Islamic countries.

https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-dark-facts-about-saudi-arabias-royal-family/

Extreme Poverty is spread in many parts of Saudia while the illegitimate clan ruling have spent trillions dollars for their extreme lechery which is illegal.

http://time.com/3679537/rich-nation-poor-people-saudi-arabia/

Islam doesn’t teach these:

https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/saudi-prince-offers-10m-to-spend-one-night-with-kim-kardashian/

https://worldnewsdailyreport.com/saudi-prince-offers-200-camels-to-spend-a-night-with-ivanka-trump/

 

[Mithridates]

Join you in what.. it was better to keep the revolution inside Iran ..and then lead by example if it would have succeeded.. not to force the ideology on others..and Muslims at that.. imagine Sunnis forcefully trying to convert Shia' to Sunnis.. how would Iran feel about that?
Now you know a little bit why Morsi was ousted..

resistance, again we didn't force anyone, bosnia has no shias so why we helped them??

 

[Wa Muhammada]

If that makes you feel better.. it is ok..
That was a bit true for some Saudis in the 70s..but things have changed a lot in 80s onward..

Things have changed ....before these lazy asses had ppl working for them and now they trying to be self sufficient, let’s see how they get on.

And bro ...why are you Saudis so subservient to white skinned westerners...it’s like you guys are overawed by them ... explain this phenomena

 

[fitpOsitive]

Saudi Arabia's permanent representative to the United Nations, Abdullah al-Maalami, stressed the Kingdom's readiness for war if it were imposed on it: "We are its men", revealing one case in which the Gulf war with Iran could be avoided.

In an interview with an Arab newspaper, al-Maalami said: "I hope we are not going to go to war, it is not in the interest of anyone, and to take the decision to go to war is the most dangerous decisions that any leader or official can take. Indicating that" War in the Gulf can be avoided by the change of Iranian behavior ».

"I am confident that the leaders of Saudi Arabia do not want war, but as Prince Saud al-Faisal, may God have mercy on him, said a few months before his death, "we do not want war, but if it is imposed on us, we are its men. This is Saudi Arabia's approach"

A huge mistake

Al-Maalami pointed out that "The common factor in all current events and in all the tension is Iranian behavior in the region.", adding that the Iranians "make a grave mistake when they think that their intervention if it has limited success in Lebanon, Iraq or elsewhere can be repeated with success on the scale of the Arab nation, as there is a solid base for the Arab nation which is Saudi Arabia ».

The Saudi ambassador expressed his satisfaction with the role of US national security adviser John Bolton in "encircling Iran's ambitions in the region. The man is not hiding his enthusiasm for an operation in Iran in one way or another. But the decision-making process in the United States is difficult and complicated and ends with the president himself."

Strong pressure

"President Trump is exerting strong diplomatic, military and economic pressure, which we missed in some previous administrations, and we hope that this pressure will lead to a change in the behavior of the Iranian regime," al-Maalami said. "We do not want to change the regime. This is up to the Iranian people, but we want to change its behavior. Of course, within the means of pressure on the Iranian regime, the economic sanctions and the blockade are primarily diplomatic. We want these pressures to succeed in order to avoid war."

On the "Deal of the Century", the Saudi delegate said: "No one knows its content. The United States says it will announce it after the end of the summer. That is welcome, but if the deal of the century does not include an independent Palestinian state, the dismantling of settlements, the right of sovereignty and the return of refugees. It is a failed deal. "


https://alqabas.com/674157/

Saidia will destroy every of her shield by herself.
Yememen, then I think Oman, Iraq destroyed, Jordan will be taken soon. So, it's the sea and Saudias enemies.
I will urge Saudis to try to make Houthis your allies, whatever the cost is.