And India getting into the UNSC as a permanant member is still a very long shot, given international dynamicsbaround reform, regardless of the platitudes uttered by leaders looking to land business and military deals.
Dear sir, I agree that any celebration is premature. That said, very few things are absolutes. What was a long shot a few years ago becomes a sure shot with the passage of time and the improvement of relationships. After all, history serves as the greatest example:
USA went to war vs. UK and (what would become) Canada
USA went to war with UK, Canada (and others) vs. Germany
England was always in perpetual war against France
When France was invated by Germany, all of the other mentioned nations went to her aid.
Now all of those nations are allies.
All of this happened over the span of 200+ years. We shouldn't be too short sighted when it comes to time.
Especially with increased globalization, co-operation, and trade - which makes relationship building a more fast process than ever before.
Lastly, nations only want to trade with other nations that have something to give. If India can give favorable trade / jobs to European / North American groups for something in return then more power to the nations doing the business.
A nation can only get so far by begging. After a while, nations need to stand up and, if you excuse me, be the change that they want to see.
UNSC reform is a major issue. But in time, it should sort itself out. What matters more is global co-operation, trade, and building relationships between North America, Europe, and Asia.
Petty rivalries and complaints over time are rather short sighted. I'm sure the French, after the battle of Agincourt could not see a future where England comes to France's aid in world wars.
As far as India is concerned, I don't think they wont mind waiting - they are one of the oldest continous civilizations in the history of our species. Even if it takes 200 years, that is only like two weeks in the history of India, if Indian history was one year long.
Please do not take offense, none was intended. And remember, I supported your first premise.
Veto power may never come, but nations are still able to do good things for the people they attempt to serve without it. Remember, this should be about what a nation can do for the people who make up that society - and not about trying to quickly achieve constructed milestones.