Samajwadi Party leader raises pro-Pakistan slogans, arrested

[ranjeet]

freedom of speech yara

more like a case of freedom after Spirits.

 

[Dem!god]

where did the freedom of speech go here, so intolerant

again do u know how freedom of speech works in india... what are its parameters....
if not then don't comment like a fool...

 

[ranjeet]

We right wingers know where their loyalty lies. Never had any doubt



Alcohol kills self-control and brings out the real self.

you racist why you hate alcohol.

 

[Ajaysingh]

Pakistan bhej do sale ko ...wha jake chilane do

 

[Ridd]

Samajwadi Party leader Mehmood Alam, resident of Jhinjhana town, was arrested on the Meerut-Karnal highway when he was extorting Money from the passers-by.

Bechaara beroozgar ho gaya hai.Frustrated hai

where did the freedom of speech go here, so intolerant

I didn't know extortion,resisting arrest,disturbing law and order situation came under freedom of expression.

 

[nik141991]

where did the freedom of speech go here, so intolerant

freedom of speech is there, but it doesn't give u wright to do anything u want

 

[Jf Thunder]

again do u know how freedom of speech works in india... what are its parameters....
if not then don't comment like a fool...

then dont comment on a Pakistani thread when someone is punished for verbally abusing Islam, k?

freedom of speech is there, but it doesn't give u wright to do anything u want

ok then, why do you guys start jumping when Pakistan punishes someone for abusing Islam?

I didn't know extortion,resisting arrest,disturbing law and order situation came under freedom of expression.

oh, then bashing muslims and Islam does come under it?

 

[nik141991]

ok then, why do you guys start jumping when Pakistan punishes someone for abusing Islam?

a guy shouting pro pakistani slogan,what does islam has to do with this, why u need to bring hindu muslim into every issue

oh, then bashing muslims and Islam does come under it?

stop trolling if u cant contribute something useful

 

[Dem!god]

then dont comment on a Pakistani thread when someone is punished for verbally abusing Islam, k?


ok then, why do you guys start jumping when Pakistan punishes someone for abusing Islam?


oh, then bashing muslims and Islam does come under it?

first u should know what freedom of speech means...
there are constitutional provisions... i am not blaberring here.... get that clear...

Restrictions
Under Indian law, the freedom of
speech and of the press do not
confer an absolute right to express
one's thoughts freely.Clause (2) of
Article 19 of the Indian constitution
enables the legislature to impose
certain restrictions on free speech
under following heads:
I. security of the State,
II. friendly relations with foreign
States,
III. public order,
IV. decency and morality,
V. contempt of court,
VI. defamation,
VII. incitement to an offence, and
VIII. sovereignty and integrity of
India.
Reasonable restrictions on these
grounds can be imposed only by a
duly enacted law and not by
executive action.[11]
Security of the State : Reasonable
restrictions can be imposed on the
freedom of speech and expression,
in the interest of the security of the
State. All the utterances intended to
endanger the security of the State
by crimes of violence intended to
overthrow the government, waging
of war and rebellion against the
government, external aggression or
war, etc., may be restrained in the
interest of the security of the State.
[12] It does not refer to the ordinary
breaches of public order which do
not involve any danger to the State.
[4]
Friendly relations with foreign
States : This ground was added by
the Constitution (First Amendment)
Act of 1951. The State can impose
reasonable restrictions on the
freedom of speech and expression,
if it tends to jeopardise the friendly
relations of India with other State.
Public order : This ground was
added by the Constitution (First
Amendment) Act, 1951 in order to
meet the situation arising from the
Supreme Court's decision in
Romesh Thapar, s case (AIR 1950
SC 124). The expression 'public
order' connotes the sense of public
peace, safety and tranquillity.
Decency and morality : The word
'obscenity' is identical with the
word 'indecency' of the Indian
Constitution.

Contempt of court: The
constitutional right to freedom of
speech would not allow a person to
contempt the courts. The
expression Contempt of Court has
been defined Section 2 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The
term contempt of court refers to
civil contempt or criminal contempt
under the Act. But judges do not
have any general immunity from
criticism of their judicial conduct,
provided that it is made in good
faith and is genuine criticism, and
not any attempt to impair the
administration of justice.

Defamation : The clause (2) of
Article 19 prevents any person from
making any statement that injures
the reputation of another. With the
same view, defamation has been
criminalised in India by inserting it
into Section 499 of the I.P.C.
Incitement to an offence : This
ground was also added by the
Constitution (First Amendment) Act,
1951. The Constitution also
prohibits a person from making any
statement that incites people to
commit offence.
Sovereignty and integrity of India:
This ground was also added
subsequently by the Constitution
(Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963.
This is aimed to prohibit anyone
from making the statements that
challenge the integrity and
sovereignty of India.


its law that work here not jingoism....

 

[nik141991]

first u should know what freedom of speech means...
there are constitutional provisions... i am not blaberring here.... get that clear...

Restrictions
Under Indian law, the freedom of
speech and of the press do not
confer an absolute right to express
one's thoughts freely.Clause (2) of
Article 19 of the Indian constitution
enables the legislature to impose
certain restrictions on free speech
under following heads:
I. security of the State,
II. friendly relations with foreign
States,
III. public order,
IV. decency and morality,
V. contempt of court,
VI. defamation,
VII. incitement to an offence, and
VIII. sovereignty and integrity of
India.
Reasonable restrictions on these
grounds can be imposed only by a
duly enacted law and not by
executive action.[11]
Security of the State : Reasonable
restrictions can be imposed on the
freedom of speech and expression,
in the interest of the security of the
State. All the utterances intended to
endanger the security of the State
by crimes of violence intended to
overthrow the government, waging
of war and rebellion against the
government, external aggression or
war, etc., may be restrained in the
interest of the security of the State.
[12] It does not refer to the ordinary
breaches of public order which do
not involve any danger to the State.
[4]
Friendly relations with foreign
States : This ground was added by
the Constitution (First Amendment)
Act of 1951. The State can impose
reasonable restrictions on the
freedom of speech and expression,
if it tends to jeopardise the friendly
relations of India with other State.
Public order : This ground was
added by the Constitution (First
Amendment) Act, 1951 in order to
meet the situation arising from the
Supreme Court's decision in
Romesh Thapar, s case (AIR 1950
SC 124). The expression 'public
order' connotes the sense of public
peace, safety and tranquillity.
Decency and morality : The word
'obscenity' is identical with the
word 'indecency' of the Indian
Constitution.

Contempt of court: The
constitutional right to freedom of
speech would not allow a person to
contempt the courts. The
expression Contempt of Court has
been defined Section 2 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The
term contempt of court refers to
civil contempt or criminal contempt
under the Act. But judges do not
have any general immunity from
criticism of their judicial conduct,
provided that it is made in good
faith and is genuine criticism, and
not any attempt to impair the
administration of justice.

Defamation : The clause (2) of
Article 19 prevents any person from
making any statement that injures
the reputation of another. With the
same view, defamation has been
criminalised in India by inserting it
into Section 499 of the I.P.C.
Incitement to an offence : This
ground was also added by the
Constitution (First Amendment) Act,
1951. The Constitution also
prohibits a person from making any
statement that incites people to
commit offence.
Sovereignty and integrity of India:
This ground was also added
subsequently by the Constitution
(Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963.
This is aimed to prohibit anyone
from making the statements that
challenge the integrity and
sovereignty of India.


its law that work here not jingoism....

mu maat lag is gawar kay, pangay baaj hai muje bane karwa diya thaa

 

[khujliwal]

Indian conspiracy at its best, a Muslim doesn't drink, that too during ramzan.

 

[Ridd]

oh, then bashing muslims and Islam does come under it?

Ideally?yes.Freedom of speech must contain the right to criticise religion and its followers.The world would have been a better place if we had more of it.

 

[nik141991]

Indian conspiracy at its best, a Muslim doesn't drink, that too during ramzan.

teri photo to badi maast hai

 

[Mr.S.Singh]

where did the freedom of speech go here, so intolerant

drunk
extortion of money
resisting arrest
and sedition charge
Sadly, the police will be nipped in the butt for sedition charge, and he will be released because he Mullah was under influence of alcohol

 

[Jf Thunder]

Ideally?yes.Freedom of speech must contain the right to criticise religion and its followers.The world would have been a better place if we had more of it.

okay, so speaking in favour of anoher country, while in the other will cause you to get arrested and not considered freedom of speech? while speaking ill of another's religion will be considered freedom of speech, WOW pure hypocrisy

first u should know what freedom of speech means...
there are constitutional provisions... i am not blaberring here.... get that clear...

Restrictions
Under Indian law, the freedom of
speech and of the press do not
confer an absolute right to express
one's thoughts freely.Clause (2) of
Article 19 of the Indian constitution
enables the legislature to impose
certain restrictions on free speech
under following heads:
I. security of the State,
II. friendly relations with foreign
States,
III. public order,
IV. decency and morality,
V. contempt of court,
VI. defamation,
VII. incitement to an offence, and
VIII. sovereignty and integrity of
India.
Reasonable restrictions on these
grounds can be imposed only by a
duly enacted law and not by
executive action.[11]
Security of the State : Reasonable
restrictions can be imposed on the
freedom of speech and expression,
in the interest of the security of the
State. All the utterances intended to
endanger the security of the State
by crimes of violence intended to
overthrow the government, waging
of war and rebellion against the
government, external aggression or
war, etc., may be restrained in the
interest of the security of the State.
[12] It does not refer to the ordinary
breaches of public order which do
not involve any danger to the State.
[4]
Friendly relations with foreign
States : This ground was added by
the Constitution (First Amendment)
Act of 1951. The State can impose
reasonable restrictions on the
freedom of speech and expression,
if it tends to jeopardise the friendly
relations of India with other State.
Public order : This ground was
added by the Constitution (First
Amendment) Act, 1951 in order to
meet the situation arising from the
Supreme Court's decision in
Romesh Thapar, s case (AIR 1950
SC 124). The expression 'public
order' connotes the sense of public
peace, safety and tranquillity.
Decency and morality : The word
'obscenity' is identical with the
word 'indecency' of the Indian
Constitution.

Contempt of court: The
constitutional right to freedom of
speech would not allow a person to
contempt the courts. The
expression Contempt of Court has
been defined Section 2 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The
term contempt of court refers to
civil contempt or criminal contempt
under the Act. But judges do not
have any general immunity from
criticism of their judicial conduct,
provided that it is made in good
faith and is genuine criticism, and
not any attempt to impair the
administration of justice.

Defamation : The clause (2) of
Article 19 prevents any person from
making any statement that injures
the reputation of another. With the
same view, defamation has been
criminalised in India by inserting it
into Section 499 of the I.P.C.
Incitement to an offence : This
ground was also added by the
Constitution (First Amendment) Act,
1951. The Constitution also
prohibits a person from making any
statement that incites people to
commit offence.
Sovereignty and integrity of India:
This ground was also added
subsequently by the Constitution
(Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963.
This is aimed to prohibit anyone
from making the statements that
challenge the integrity and
sovereignty of India.


its law that work here not jingoism....

ok then, dont cry on our threads where we punsih people who badmouth religion according to our laws okay?

a guy shouting pro pakistani slogan,what does islam has to do with this, why u need to bring hindu muslim into every issue



stop trolling if u cant contribute something useful

i was giving an example of misuse of freedom of speech