What's new

S300...nobody must be scared of this...

. .
plz post some new video about S300.......................
 
.
@MarkusS : Iran is likely to buy S-400 now if it does buy Russian at all.

S-300 is not a missile that is any better than what it can now produce domestically.
 
.
Accidents happen all the time. Kudos they filmed it. Could have hid it like the Americans do :rofl:
 
.
It would be a fitting compliment to the Qhaher 5th gen fighter jet.
 
.
It would be a fitting compliment to the Qhaher 5th gen fighter jet.


The problem is that Qhaher is not real but the S-300 is. And if much older 1950s Soviet SAMS have downed F-16's then good luck with the S-300. How did that Turkish F-4 do?

Good luck Iran buying this crap




Much older Soviet SAMs have downed scores of Tornado fighters as well as many other aircraft. By your logic everything is "crap", the F-22 is crap, the Tornado is crap, everything that has malfunctioned is crap according to you.
 
.
The problem is that Qhaher is not real but the S-300 is. And if much older 1950s Soviet SAMS have downed F-16's then good luck with the S-300. How did that Turkish F-4 do?





Much older Soviet SAMs have downed scores of Tornado fighters as well as many other aircraft. By your logic everything is "crap", the F-22 is crap, the Tornado is crap, everything that has malfunctioned is crap according to you.


It is idiotic to believe wars are won in 21st century with outdated shit like this. You need no rocket to stop the iranian nuclear program or to sabotage it. Its good for russia to earn some money though. But S300 could not stop StuxNet nor did it safe iranian scientists or prevent mysterious explosions inside iranian nuclear facilities.
 
.
It is idiotic to believe wars are won in 21st century with outdated shit like this. You need no rocket to stop the iranian nuclear program or to sabotage it. Its good for russia to earn some money though. But S300 could not stop StuxNet nor did it safe iranian scientists or prevent mysterious explosions inside iranian nuclear facilities.


Yet many countries keep developing such "outdated" technology. One weapons system does not win a war, it is when everything is put together. The S-300 is just one weapons system, a weapons system that is easily capable of shooting down virtually any aircraft. If Iran were weaker it would have been bombed long ago, there is obviously fear that Iran can hit back.
 
. .
The problem is that Qhaher is not real but the S-300 is. And if much older 1950s Soviet SAMS have downed F-16's then good luck with the S-300. How did that Turkish F-4 do?
Not every f-16 is the same. The subsystems the jet has makes it a good jet or a bad jet. Those s-300 can have good luck against a f-16 with the newest gen sub-systems. Greece has s-300 and Turkish f-16 jams that crap with ease and renders it useless. Turkey even bought 1 s-300 from Belarus for testing purposes.
 
.
Not every f-16 is the same. The subsystems the jet has makes it a good jet or a bad jet. Those s-300 can have good luck against a f-16 with the newest gen sub-systems. Greece has s-300 and Turkish f-16 jams that crap with ease and renders it useless. Turkey even bought 1 s-300 from Belarus for testing purposes.




Turkey Jam the S-300 easily yet a Turkish F-4 took it strait up the tail pipe.
 
.
It is idiotic to believe wars are won in 21st century with outdated shit like this. You need no rocket to stop the iranian nuclear program or to sabotage it. Its good for russia to earn some money though. But S300 could not stop StuxNet nor did it safe iranian scientists or prevent mysterious explosions inside iranian nuclear facilities.

S 300 which are placed in Kaliningrad and Belarus are seen as the biggest threat in Baltics and Here you are talking about Iran.o_O

s300p1.jpg
 
.
Good luck Iran buying this crap


same can be said of this..

image022.jpg


or this..

"During the Gulf War, twenty-eight U.S. soldiers were killed and almost one hundred others were wounded when a nearby Patriot missile defense system failed to properly track a Scud missilelaunched from Iraq. The cause of the failure was later found to be a programming error in the computer embedded in the Patriot’s weapons control system."

WAR IN THE GULF - Scud Attack - Scud Missile Hits a U.S. Barracks, Killing 27 - NYTimes.com
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom