What's new

S&P downgrades Pakistan’s long-term credit rating

ni8mare

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
2,607
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
ISLAMABAD: Raising questions over economic fundamentals over the next two years, Standard & Poor’s on Monday downgraded Pakistan’s long-term credit rating to ‘B-Negative’ from ‘B’, as the new government struggled with structural reform push.

“Pakistan’s economic outlook, as well as its external position, have deteriorated well beyond our previous expectations,” said the New York-based rating agency, adding that it also lowered the long-term issue rating on senior unsecured debt and Sukuk bond to ‘B-’ from ‘B’.

Read more: Bank consortium, govt agree to launch Rs200bn sukuk

With weaker economic settings and limited progress in addressing fiscal imbalances following the elections in mid-2018, the rating agency said: “The prospects for a rapid recovery in fiscal and external settings are now diminished.”

More modest growth prospects and limited reserve buffers will continue to challenge the country’s external position, even as the government receives financial aid from various partners. Negotiations with the International Monetary Fund had taken longer than anticipated, the S&P said, believing that the reform timeline would be more protracted in nature.

Says prospects for rapid recovery in fiscal, external settings now diminished

In the short-term, the agency affirmed Pakistan’s ‘B’ rating on the basis of expectations that the country would secure sufficient funding to meet its external obligations in the next one year and that neither external nor fiscal metrics would deteriorate well beyond current projections.

“We may raise our ratings on Pakistan if the economy materially outperforms our expectations, strengthening the country’s fiscal and external positions,” the agency said, but warned that ratings could be lowered further if Pakistan’s fiscal, economic or external indicators continued to deteriorate, such that the government’s external debt repayments came under pressure.

The S&P said the GDP growth rate would fall to four per cent this year (2019) from 5.8pc last year (2018) and then stay 3.5pc for the next two years (2020 and 2021) and fall further to 3.3pc by 2022.

It noted that Pakistan had secured financial aid from bilateral partners to address its immediate external financing needs, but fiscal and external imbalances would remain elevated. The government’s protracted negotiations with the IMF suggest that any resulting reforms, whether under the programme or otherwise, will be less expedient than previously anticipated.

Read more: Special report: What will the year ahead bring for Pakistan's economy?

Fiscal consolidation will be challenging as the economy slows owing to a paucity of growth drivers, and as the stimulus from China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investment fades. Although Pakistan will benefit over the long term from the associated improvements in its infrastructure, this will be counterbalanced by heightened fiscal and external stresses over the next few years.

“In our opinion, the government led by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) party has yet to introduce fiscal measures that are sufficient to bring about a substantial improvement in the general government deficit,” the S&P noted. It expressed concern over the measures taken in the October 2018 mini-budget to increase revenue from petroleum products and infrastructure development and said additional measures would be necessary to bring about a more meaningful decline in the fiscal deficit.

Explore: Intricacies of the policy rate hike

The second mini-budget presented in January should be marginally supportive of the economy, but is unlikely to have a significant impact on fiscal imbalances.

The ratings on Pakistan remain constrained by a narrow tax base and domestic and external security risks, which continue to be high. Although the country’s security situation has gradually improved over the recent years, the ongoing vulnerabilities weaken the government’s effectiveness and weigh on the business climate. Moreover, the change in government after the elections failed to yield serious reform push on institutional and economic profile even though it publicly acknowledged the necessity of economic and fiscal reform. “Progress has been slower than anticipated,” the rating agency said.

On top of that, the country’s very low income level remained a rating weakness and inadequate infrastructure and security risks continued to act as structural impediments to foreign direct investment and sustainable economic growth. “The 2018 general elections have thus far not elicited a significant improvement in Pakistan’s economic environment and these difficulties would persist for some time, and key metrics will worsen further through 2019,” the S&P said.

The agency estimated Pakistan’s GDP per capita at just over $1,500 in 2018, one of the lowest, and forecast annual real GDP growth to an average 3.6pc over 2019-22. Pakistan’s per capita GDP growth is somewhat lower, at about 1.5pc, due to a fast-growing population.

“Our weaker growth projections mainly reflect the diminishing stimulatory impact of the investments associated with the CPEC, negative fiscal impulse as the government looks to rein in its deficit, and declining economic sentiment. Growth will also be constrained by domestic security challenges and long-lasting hostility with neighbouring India and Afghanistan,” it added.

Explore: Challenges in South Asia to grow due to elections in Afghanistan, India: US report

The S&P said the previous Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz government had improved the security situation, and “we would expect the PTI government to continue this positive momentum to improve business climate”.

It said the pressure on external accounts would increase further in 2019 and general government debt was forecast to rise toward 70.2pc of GDP by the end of fiscal 2022, with slower GDP growth and still-elevated deficits. Likewise, Pakistan’s interest-servicing burden will remain elevated, at an average of 32.4pc of revenues.

The rating agency expected the current account deficit to decline somewhat over the next two years, with energy prices falling and the economy slowing, but Pakistan’s external financing and indebtedness metrics remained stressed. The country’s high degree of external stress is marked by a significant rise in the economy’s gross external financing needs relative to its current account receipts and useable reserves. “We forecast this ratio will climb to 151.1pc at the end of fiscal 2019, versus approximately 131pc in the previous year,” it said.

The S&P also projected the country’s narrow net external debt to rise to more than 170pc of current account receipts from just below 140pc the previous year. Though external aid will help meet immediate payment needs, indebtedness will continue to rise in kind. Although the new government has elucidated its aim to consolidate its fiscal accounts, the rating agency believed the progress would be diminished by political constraints, especially in view of more difficult economic circumstances

https://www.dawn.com/news/1461907/sp-downgrades-pakistans-long-term-credit-rating
 
. .
ISLAMABAD: Raising questions over economic fundamentals over the next two years, Standard & Poor’s on Monday downgraded Pakistan’s long-term credit rating to ‘B-Negative’ from ‘B’, as the new government struggled with structural reform push.

“Pakistan’s economic outlook, as well as its external position, have deteriorated well beyond our previous expectations,” said the New York-based rating agency, adding that it also lowered the long-term issue rating on senior unsecured debt and Sukuk bond to ‘B-’ from ‘B’.

Read more: Bank consortium, govt agree to launch Rs200bn sukuk

With weaker economic settings and limited progress in addressing fiscal imbalances following the elections in mid-2018, the rating agency said: “The prospects for a rapid recovery in fiscal and external settings are now diminished.”

More modest growth prospects and limited reserve buffers will continue to challenge the country’s external position, even as the government receives financial aid from various partners. Negotiations with the International Monetary Fund had taken longer than anticipated, the S&P said, believing that the reform timeline would be more protracted in nature.

Says prospects for rapid recovery in fiscal, external settings now diminished

In the short-term, the agency affirmed Pakistan’s ‘B’ rating on the basis of expectations that the country would secure sufficient funding to meet its external obligations in the next one year and that neither external nor fiscal metrics would deteriorate well beyond current projections.

“We may raise our ratings on Pakistan if the economy materially outperforms our expectations, strengthening the country’s fiscal and external positions,” the agency said, but warned that ratings could be lowered further if Pakistan’s fiscal, economic or external indicators continued to deteriorate, such that the government’s external debt repayments came under pressure.

The S&P said the GDP growth rate would fall to four per cent this year (2019) from 5.8pc last year (2018) and then stay 3.5pc for the next two years (2020 and 2021) and fall further to 3.3pc by 2022.

It noted that Pakistan had secured financial aid from bilateral partners to address its immediate external financing needs, but fiscal and external imbalances would remain elevated. The government’s protracted negotiations with the IMF suggest that any resulting reforms, whether under the programme or otherwise, will be less expedient than previously anticipated.

Read more: Special report: What will the year ahead bring for Pakistan's economy?

Fiscal consolidation will be challenging as the economy slows owing to a paucity of growth drivers, and as the stimulus from China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investment fades. Although Pakistan will benefit over the long term from the associated improvements in its infrastructure, this will be counterbalanced by heightened fiscal and external stresses over the next few years.

“In our opinion, the government led by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) party has yet to introduce fiscal measures that are sufficient to bring about a substantial improvement in the general government deficit,” the S&P noted. It expressed concern over the measures taken in the October 2018 mini-budget to increase revenue from petroleum products and infrastructure development and said additional measures would be necessary to bring about a more meaningful decline in the fiscal deficit.

Explore: Intricacies of the policy rate hike

The second mini-budget presented in January should be marginally supportive of the economy, but is unlikely to have a significant impact on fiscal imbalances.

The ratings on Pakistan remain constrained by a narrow tax base and domestic and external security risks, which continue to be high. Although the country’s security situation has gradually improved over the recent years, the ongoing vulnerabilities weaken the government’s effectiveness and weigh on the business climate. Moreover, the change in government after the elections failed to yield serious reform push on institutional and economic profile even though it publicly acknowledged the necessity of economic and fiscal reform. “Progress has been slower than anticipated,” the rating agency said.

On top of that, the country’s very low income level remained a rating weakness and inadequate infrastructure and security risks continued to act as structural impediments to foreign direct investment and sustainable economic growth. “The 2018 general elections have thus far not elicited a significant improvement in Pakistan’s economic environment and these difficulties would persist for some time, and key metrics will worsen further through 2019,” the S&P said.

The agency estimated Pakistan’s GDP per capita at just over $1,500 in 2018, one of the lowest, and forecast annual real GDP growth to an average 3.6pc over 2019-22. Pakistan’s per capita GDP growth is somewhat lower, at about 1.5pc, due to a fast-growing population.

“Our weaker growth projections mainly reflect the diminishing stimulatory impact of the investments associated with the CPEC, negative fiscal impulse as the government looks to rein in its deficit, and declining economic sentiment. Growth will also be constrained by domestic security challenges and long-lasting hostility with neighbouring India and Afghanistan,” it added.

Explore: Challenges in South Asia to grow due to elections in Afghanistan, India: US report

The S&P said the previous Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz government had improved the security situation, and “we would expect the PTI government to continue this positive momentum to improve business climate”.

It said the pressure on external accounts would increase further in 2019 and general government debt was forecast to rise toward 70.2pc of GDP by the end of fiscal 2022, with slower GDP growth and still-elevated deficits. Likewise, Pakistan’s interest-servicing burden will remain elevated, at an average of 32.4pc of revenues.

The rating agency expected the current account deficit to decline somewhat over the next two years, with energy prices falling and the economy slowing, but Pakistan’s external financing and indebtedness metrics remained stressed. The country’s high degree of external stress is marked by a significant rise in the economy’s gross external financing needs relative to its current account receipts and useable reserves. “We forecast this ratio will climb to 151.1pc at the end of fiscal 2019, versus approximately 131pc in the previous year,” it said.

The S&P also projected the country’s narrow net external debt to rise to more than 170pc of current account receipts from just below 140pc the previous year. Though external aid will help meet immediate payment needs, indebtedness will continue to rise in kind. Although the new government has elucidated its aim to consolidate its fiscal accounts, the rating agency believed the progress would be diminished by political constraints, especially in view of more difficult economic circumstances

https://www.dawn.com/news/1461907/sp-downgrades-pakistans-long-term-credit-rating
Already in non investment grade, Pakistan is just one grade away from junk category grading. Any investors will have to be an utter stupid to invest in the bonds offered by Pakistani government.

Well, you two Clowns can blabber all you want, but the fact of the matter is that large number of Pakistanis are planning to invest in the recent Dollar Bonds issued by the government.
 
.
Well, you two Clowns can blabber all you want, but the fact of the matter is that large number of Pakistanis are planning to invest in the recent Dollar Bonds issued by the government.

Only time will tell. Pakistan is having trouble paying off loans at 2-3% interest rate, while promising investors a return rate of 5%. Only idiots will fall for such scams.
 
.
Allthrough its about Pakistan and i don't have problem with the downgrade...But sometimes i feel like world was alot better place before Industrial Revolution.I mean seriously a private institution deciding other countries credit rating...
 
.
Pakistan's leadership is only focused on daily handouts instead of making structural economic changes
 
. . . .
Only time will tell. Pakistan is having trouble paying off loans at 2-3% interest rate, while promising investors a return rate of 5%. Only idiots will fall for such scams.

The PBC scheme may yet succeed. Let us wait for data showing the amount sold.
 
.
Allthrough its about Pakistan and i don't have problem with the downgrade...But sometimes i feel like world was alot better place before Industrial Revolution.I mean seriously a private institution deciding other countries credit rating...

The private institution does not do it voluntarily. Pakistan Govt (As all other Govts) pay them fees to rate their bonds. This is because no investor would invest in any security if it is not rated by a credible credit rating agency.
 
.
All these organizations are pro IMF and a bit biased.The moment we have a deal with IMF, their ratings for Pakistan will be upgraded with in months just like all the time.
 
.
Well the bases seems very negative ... Despite of sharp decline in fiscal deficit and current account deficit these ratings are beyond understanding ...

If that would have done in previous fiscal year or at the time of the previous budget than that would have been understandable but at this point of time where government still has option of IMF open and managed it without rescheduling of loans and fundamentals are being corrected in the form of transfer of losses in energy sector to end consumer without transferring them to export-oriented industry whereas sharp reduction in government expenses to reduce fiscal deficit and intent of 3 major countries to invest in Pakistan ...

This is just a pressure tactics from IMF ...

They are simply saying, if you don't come to IMF we will make it impossible to you to go to any other channel ...

Change in credit rating just at the time of launching of bonds, that's hilarious ...
 
.
Only time will tell. Pakistan is having trouble paying off loans at 2-3% interest rate, while promising investors a return rate of 5%. Only idiots will fall for such scams.

There are many patriotic Pakistani who will be more then happy to invest in Pakistan because of Imran Khan's honesty and their love for Pakistan.

You and I both know that current Corrupt mafia want Pakistan to default on the loans and compromise with west on Nuclear weapons. We are in this financial mess because of agencies and Army that allowed corrupt mafia to do massive corruption and launder money from Pakistan.

Musharraf was USA puppet and made General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani COAS on the recommendation of USA state department. Corruption story starts with General Kayani. General Kayani was COAS for two terms from 29 November 2007 – 29 November 2013. After becoming COAS, Kayani made a deal with USA to bring PPP into power. Musharraf had no idea that he was played by General Kayani and USA. During Kayani tenure, he allowed PPP to do massive corruption. OBL drama took place on May 2, 2011 on the approval of General Kayani and Asif Zardari. We all know that OBL was dead long time ago. It was just a drama by USA to show the world they killed OBL. They only found his wife and children which they killed.

The problem with army is that army doesn't want Civilian government or political party to get strong and cut their (army) power, and to prevent that army and agencies do political engineering. MQM, MQM-H and PMLQ and other parties were part of their political engineering.
I think it's time Army and agencies to realize that they are being counter productive. Had they worked with civilian government and guided them to make the right decisions, we would have been in a better financial situation and with robust economy.

Pakistan's leadership is only focused on daily handouts instead of making structural economic changes

That's not true. Current government is trying their best but bureaucracy and opposition is working against them. Corruption is in every department and it will take time to get rid of these rotten eggs.
We have 100 years judicial system and 100 years old laws. We need to revamp whole judicial system to catch and convict corrupt mafia and criminals.

As far as economy is concerned, current government is focused on 4 main industries, IT industry, Telecom, Tourism and small business/small to medium industries including animal farming (cow, goat, Chicken, donkey, etc) while improving existing industries including textile.
There are many dependences in order for economy to get on the right rack. We need water and electricity. We need to build dams to make electricity so we can supply it to our industries. Current government is the process of bringing solar technology to Pakistan to manufacture solar panels and build solar farms to increase electricity production. Also, reducing taxes on importing solar batteries and solar panels.
 
Last edited:
.
Well the bases seems very negative ... Despite of sharp decline in fiscal deficit and current account deficit these ratings are beyond understanding ...

If that would have done in previous fiscal year or at the time of the previous budget than that would have been understandable but at this point of time where government still has option of IMF open and managed it without rescheduling of loans and fundamentals are being corrected in the form of transfer of losses in energy sector to end consumer without transferring them to export-oriented industry whereas sharp reduction in government expenses to reduce fiscal deficit and intent of 3 major countries to invest in Pakistan ...

This is just a pressure tactics from IMF ...

They are simply saying, if you don't come to IMF we will make it impossible to you to go to any other channel ...

Change in credit rating just at the time of launching of bonds, that's hilarious ...
what makes you think pakistani expatriates pay attention to those ratings ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom