What's new

RUSTOM-II UCAV's High Speed Taxi-Trials (HSTT) Re-Commence With Indigenously Developed Actuators

.
got to admit it looks awfully ugly.
even look more ugly when it blows tank from above.... lol

Baby steps for India which is moving at a snail's pace in this field and still largely dependent on US goodwills。:argh:
sorry, Its Israeli ........ do your homework well...... We are talking about India and not PAK :haha:
 
Last edited:
. . .
looks like owr new DM has pressing DRDO very hard to get things moving in right direction ...ab ayega mazza
 
. .
got to admit it looks awfully ugly.

A10 looks uglier..but its a kick@$$ aircraft..ch-3 is another uglier drone,but it gets its job done in Pakistan. When we're talking about weapons, its may not look like elvish stuff,but if it gets its job done,then its more than enough.seriously noobs,how more pathetic you guys can become...
 
.
Indian fabrication is cheap and rudimentary. A direct reflection perhaps of its rushed and often ill-planned research misadventures.

Ever since the Rustom-I's pictures carrying what appear to be missiles on its wing brackets have surfaced, I can't help but notice how horribly out of alignment they appear to be. Not that it would make a great difference firing them, but just the pitiful lack of quality and care put into arming the UAV is utterly disgraceful.

Often the only thing distinguishing indigenous Indian aeronautical crafts from the toys I buy from RC is the hefty price tag associated with the former. And perhaps all the hollow praise from the legions of Indian fanboys who've made def.pk their home.


You're from defense department's quality control department?? Or do you know anything about this drone's criteria which was submitted by armed force,its aerodynamics, its communication, payload capacity, endurance, engine etc???

You know,when you've to $#!t,it is not necessary that you come here and $#!t,for that purpose,I hope there is a toilet in your house.
 
.
When you open mouth it always produces BS as usual.


Read before posting. LCRA was developed in 90s as a test aircraft for canard technology so old is Rustom-I design.

Old or new. The RUSTOM-I is still rudimentary and cheap.

That's quite rich coming from a country that re-paints Chinese drones and call it "indigenous".
Make a 100cc bike engine first and then criticise others about lack of quality.

To be fair even the RUSTOM-I is a cheap knock-off of the Chinese CH-3. India's tech industry is in the stone-age.

Ho gayi bejati.....ab jao mu chupao....Khene se phele soch liya kar mere bhai....You are a pakistani not an american or even European with vast and deep knowledge of advance aerospace or any other technology. :disagree:

The Indian inferiority complex. Some say it has a direct correlation to phallic inadequacy.
 
.
To be fair even the RUSTOM-I is a cheap knock-off of the Chinese CH-3. India's tech industry is in the stone-age.
Why are you making a A$$ of yourself ?? A simple google search will reveal that India was flying Rustom I even b4 you guys where pondering about the paint job on your Burakh. It will also reveal that design is based on a Rutlan aircraft from 80's. And FYI you guys cannot make a moped/Grass mower engine. Talking about aerospace engineering dose not suit you. When we need a professional advise on suicide bombing, terrorism and conspiracy theories, we will consult you.
 
.
yeah Boko Haram also has better GDP than India who can compete with nomadic fools you win
He's right, India shouldn't be calling a country with a far higher GDP per capital a poor sinkhole country /nomadic fool. Nigeria still has a far higher GDP per capital than India. And no, no country on earth counts GDP in PPP terms, only poor countries who want to boast their ego. If we did, then China will already be the world's largest economy not the U. S.
 
.
He's right, India shouldn't be calling a country with a far higher GDP per capital a poor sinkhole country /nomadic fool. Nigeria still has a far higher GDP per capital than India. And no, no country on earth counts GDP in PPP terms, only poor countries who want to boast their ego. If we did, then China will already be the world's largest economy not the U. S.

In essence GDP is intended to be a measure of total national economic activity not as an indicator of living standards for it does not include several factors that influence the same. Even when GDP is used

As far as poverty is concerned - World Bank estimates Nigeria's BPL population to be at 33.10% whereas India's BPL population is estimated at 23.6%.

http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/pr...omic-trends-and-progress-in-poverty-reduction
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/20384/9781464803611.pdf

And even when poverty is assessed by WB - It is the PPP methodology at 2005 international prices taken into account for headcount ratio.
 
.
In Pakistan most people have 99 dollars left after paying for the burger, in india they owe 99 cents after buying that burger, bye the way we have rich delicious beef in our burgers, what do you guys have Kaddoo?

Lol this is nothing , the per Capita as per PPP is the right measurement .

IN PAK it takes more then 1 $ to buy burger where as in India it come under 1$.
 
. .
In Pakistan most people have 99 dollars left after paying for the burger, in india they owe 99 cents after buying that burger, bye the way we have rich delicious beef in our burgers, what do you guys have Kaddoo?
$99 and that too Pakistanis:sarcastic:!!Man you must be smoking some cheap Afgan sh*t to talk like this:lol:.Pehenne ko kapda nehi,khane ko chawal nehi aur chale Burgur khane:rofl:!!Your country is surviving on aids and grants and you're talking about eating burgers.Like they say in English"A beggar can't be a chooser":omghaha:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom