Read my earlier posts. Weather alone cannot disrupt thermal vision.Finally u realised that fog does affect thermal. Seems u searched or asked someone.
Beacause you want to . Seekers installed on missiles are low cost intended for single use. They are all bad quality which need a clear designation.Israel is one of world leaders in thermals Russia is third world.
You have played absurd already. Time to shift to a more serious tone.You does not exist.
Kornet does not exist either.
What warhead will not know is to on what lock to. Unless you prove it with a video, or statement, I will not believe logically.Lets say we fire at 2 km. During 2 sec of climbing 30 km/h tank will move at 17 m. Thats less than half grad. warhead wont even notice.
And nobody replaced old systems or adopted them in wide use.On contrary. Almost everyone bought light versions.
Because Spike ER does not fully meet today´s needs.Thats true thats why they are still used together with Spike ER.
This is fire demonstration from actual army unit.These are just trainings/show. Show me actually infantry unit which carries Kornet on their backs. U wont be able.
You are now saying Kornet is not portable?
anti-tank system KORNET -E (
What has that to do with what I said?It does. Only specialized Kvartet modules have laser range finders. Simple Kornet (like on pics above) does not have.
You are not going to waste a thousand dollar missile in that way, essencially since Spike fire power is limited.If we needed to incease damage we would made it. But HEAT are powerful enough because they are very accurate. In some cases they are even too powerful.
That´s not the difference according to export prices.Me too. Kornet missile is only two times cheaper than Spike.
That is good before engagement, spotted in position or moving, can be taken as unarmed vehicle and given low priority, and after engagement, retire and apparent unarmed. It is tactically important. Your Spike will be the first to be targeted .In order to fire Korne D should put them out and stand on high hill in lighn of sight with the target.
Can it fire on move? even worse than older 2nd gen missiles in combat.Closed position at ranges 2.5 km+. At shorter ranges fire and forget.
You can ask to KBP or Rosoboronexport representatives at exhibition, and they´ll convince you.Everything was shwn is plastic launcher of air launched Hermes.
Both depend on external designation.Why do u need Kransopol at all? Tamuz is for same reason but it does not need laser targeting and it can be launched from a jeep.
Everything.What specialized munition u can use at 25 km?
Same is Tamuz, needs recon from special force, UAV or aerial means. Risk is the same. Both are supposed to operate like that and external designation is a given.Every long range munition needs recon info. But Krasnopol needs also illimination with laser. Illumination is done ether by special force, UAV, helicopter. But all this is complicated, not always available, risky, alarms the target. Tamuz on the other hand can guide by itself, thats why its is far far more self sufficient than Krasnopol.