What's new

Russia's Medvedev hints of Chinese threat to Far East

India is kidding themselves if they think they can beat the PLA. Didn't you learn your lesson back in 1962?
The Chinese special forces can beat the Indian army. Indian army is a ragtag army just like Saddam Hussein's Iraqi army. Both are highly fragmented, disorganized, poorly equipped, and poorly trained.

Don't write checks you can't cash son, 1962 should have taught you that.

That's why your army got kicked off in Chola incident.
 
.
A Preview Of Russia's New Military Doctrine

Summary: Experts and media reports suggest Russia's
new military doctrine, intended to project defense policy to
2020, will be issued in the near future. News headlines will
focus on the fact that the new doctrine lowers the threshold
for the use of nuclear weapons if other countries infringe on
Russia's security interests. The new doctrine calls for
accelerating the professionalization of the military (without
abolishing conscription) and preparing for small, local
conflicts. One contact involved in drafting the doctrine
said China, not the west, is Russia's main preoccupation
and
a stand-off in the Far East would the only conceivable
scenario under which Russia would threaten the use of nuclear
weapons. End summary.

(C) Zolotarev argued that, while the chances of a
large-scale war breaking out are remote, China would most
likely be the target of any preemptive nuclear strike.
Most
serious military planners dismissed any threat from NATO long
ago, he posited. China still has a mass mobilization army,
he said, and the Russian Far East is thinly populated, has
little infrastructure, and a small Russian military
contingent. With the Russian army restructured to rapidly
respond to small-scale wars, the GOR would have to rely on
its nuclear deterrent to prevent a Chinese attack. He
admitted, however, that by declaring the right to launch a
nuclear first strike, Russia appeared to be taking a step
back from the spirit, if not the letter of its Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty Article VI commitments regarding
nuclear disarmament. Other analysts have told us the poor
state of Russia's conventional forces leave the planners with
 
.

I've got a citation from Medvedev saying otherwise.

Russia Threatens First Strike on NATO Missiles; Obama to Medvedev: Wait, What? I Said I’d Have More Flexibility After My Election! Remind Vladimir! « The Constitution Club

"May 3, 2012 – Skip to navigation; Skip to main content; Skip to primary sidebar; Skip to ... Russia Threatens First Strike on NATO Missiles; Obama to Medvedev: Wait, What? ... At least the rich don't threaten the O-man with a first strike."
 
. .
India and China only went to full scale in 1962, other incidents were skirmishes, not wars. Indian military is ragtag as you get. Indian soldiers are target practice for the PLA. If the PLA decides to use full force, India will be history.

Number of Chinese soldiers dead in Chola incident still haven't been declassfied.
 
.
India is kidding themselves if they think they can beat the PLA.

India has no interest in beating PLA, merely defend our territory.

Didn't you learn your lesson back in 1962?

We did.

The Chinese special forces can beat the Indian army.

Special forces beating a conventional military? :lol:

Indian army is a ragtag army

So whats stopping the mighty PLA (and special forces) from taking back Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim ? :D

What happened to PLA in 1965 and 1971, despite warning she never showed up, to help Pakistan? ;)

just like Saddam Hussein's Iraqi army. Both are highly fragmented, disorganized, poorly equipped, and poorly trained.

Saddam army in the 1st and 2nd gulf war was exactly the opposite of what you mention,

As matter of fact they used Chinese equipment and Chinese military doctorines :rofl:

Strange that you think so low of Chinese equpment and doctorine

Don't write checks you can't cash son, 1962 should have taught you that.

It did, you can see its results in 1971 war.

India and China only went to full scale in 1962, other incidents were skirmishes, not wars. Indian military is ragtag as you get. Indian soldiers are target practice for the PLA. If the PLA decides to use full force, India will be history.

Actually, China and India both will be cemented in military history , for China foolish dragging her army into a war of attrition with India, leaving her Eastern and Northern borders unguarded. :cheesy:

I've got a citation from Medvedev saying otherwise.

Russia Threatens First Strike on NATO Missiles; Obama to Medvedev: Wait, What? I Said I’d Have More Flexibility After My Election! Remind Vladimir! « The Constitution Club

"May 3, 2012 – Skip to navigation; Skip to main content; Skip to primary sidebar; Skip to ... Russia Threatens First Strike on NATO Missiles; Obama to Medvedev: Wait, What? ... At least the rich don't threaten the O-man with a first strike."

Good ! hope Medvedev gives you the comfort :)
 
.
India and China only went to full scale in 1962, other incidents were skirmishes, not wars. Indian military is ragtag as you get. Indian soldiers are target practice for the PLA. If the PLA decides to use full force, India will be history.

What ever you are saying is in your perspective which is entirely false, the truth is we know how our Army operates and what is happening in IA you Chinese never know what the CCP is upto and PLA.
CCP is worried about India which is main blockade in any conflict of China. This is the reason your propaganda news media never mentioned India as a threat.
China will never ever dominate Asia that is for sure.
 
.
Good for Russia.
Hopefully they will realize they dont belong with people who have no respect for intellectual property or property in general for that matter.
 
. . . .
The only threat is USA. Stupid Russians forgot what happened top their beloved USSR by USA. Russia, Chinese and other country should unite and remove this USA threat from this world.
 
.
The only threat is USA. Stupid Russians forgot what happened top their beloved USSR by USA. Russia, Chinese and other country should unite and remove this USA threat from this world.

Threats near to home are often given greater priority.
 
. .
Seriously, we are all tired of these China vs Russia flamebaits, how about we stop bashing each other and work together to bring down US?

Since they possess some of the best arable and habitable land in the world, and we can both take a share of it.
What world are you living in? China nor Russia can never hope to defeat the US, not in this century at least. The very best you could do is destroy half of humanity but that's about it.
Taking parts of the US...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom