deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
IAF is not going for those fighters.
it is the indian navy which is .......
as i said , the sukhoi-33 can fly from the larger aircraft carriers of the varyag class , but not from the admiral groshkov.
so the navy had to go for the mig 29 k.
of course , the mig 29 k has rectified the problem of smoking engines by rendering them smokeless, and range has been increased by accomodating fuel in a ' hump ' on its body.
where even the older mig 29 scored over its adversaries was its maneuverability and ability to fire the then revolutionary AA--11 archer ( NATO name )missile at off-boresight angles , and the mig 29 k has added active radar homing missiles like AA-12 adder ( NATO name ) and new radar ( Zukh--ME) with guided ground attack weapons to make it an extremely potent platform .
but the RD-33 engine remains........
you wont find the mig-35 winning the MRCA contract due to this very engine .
I think there are more reasons for Mig-35 not winning then just the engine...Anyhow that is not the point we are discussing....IAF is updating all the Mig-29 and the fighter will become equivalent to IN mig-29. IN is very happy with the fighter air-craft. The inititial order of 16 has been complemented with another 29....A total of 45 air-crafts which are going to stay with them for another 2-3 decades....Are you telling me that we compromised on the most crucial aspect(its engine) of the Air-craft because we bought admiral groshkov????
There is a parallel thread running on an interview about Mig-29K...Please read that.....