What's new

Russian Report Say Cheonan Sunk by Mine Explosion

CardSharp

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
9,355
Reaction score
0
Russian naval experts who inquired into the sinking of a South Korean warship March 26, found unconvincing the arguments put forward by a four-nation team of investigators, blaming Pyongyang for the tragedy, an Interfax-AVN news wire report, quoting an anonymous Russian Navy source, said Tuesday.

The revelation followed the return Monday of a team of four Russian Navy submarine and torpedo experts to Moscow after making an independent assessment of the March 26 sinking of the 1,200-ton South Korean Navy corvette “Cheonan” near the disputed Yellow Sea border, in which 46 sailors drowned. The report said the experts had not found convincing evidence that a heavy torpedo fired by a North Korean submarine sank the South Korean vessel.

“After examining the available evidence and the ship wreckage, Russian experts came to the conclusion that a number of arguments adduced by the international investigation team in favor of the DPRK’s (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) involvement in the corvette-sinking were not weighty enough,” the Russian Navy source said.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The daily newspaper Hankyoreh reported yesterday that Russia has concluded the sinking of the South Korean warship Cheonan was a sea mine accident, not a torpedo attack by North Korea. If the report is true, Russia will be the first nation to try to absolve North Korea for the incident, which is considered the most deadly attack on the South’s military since the Korean War.

The Defense Ministry denied the newspaper’s report. The Hankyoreh report was based on what the vernacular paper claimed is an official document from the Russian government. Titled “Russian Navy experts group’s review of the cause of the sinking of the South Korean ship Cheonan,” the document claimed the explosion that sunk the Cheonan was an accident.

The document was cited as saying that the Cheonan was cruising in a shallow area close to the shore when its propeller got tangled in a net. As the corvette was trying to get into deeper sea, the ship touched an antenna-shaped detonator of a mine, which triggered the explosion. It did not say whether the mine was North Korean.



Links
http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?id=1328583
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2923819
 
.
No doubt the Cheonan was a false flag.

Theres no way a 1960 cold war era sub could have sneaked past 4 modern Aegis cruisers that were guarding the Cheonan and sunk it while escaping undetected.

Furthermore the so called evidence they found was a german torpedo with the korean number 1 written on it. Hardly evidence of anything.
 
.
pohang_cor-1.jpg


0517-ODU-South-Korea-Cheonan-warship_full_600.jpg


3highres_00000402117773.jpg
 
.
Thanks for the great pics Navtrek.


Here is a very good but lengthy article.

South Korea reels as US backpedals
Asia Times Online :: Korea News and Korean Business and Economy, Pyongyang News

"...even if it is able to plausibly address issues like the magic-marker Korean characters scrawled on the recovered torpedo fragments - an inscription that remarkably survived even as the high-temperature paints coating the torpedo were themselves incinerated - the high tide of indignation orchestrated by the United States, South Korea and Japan has clearly passed"

This report I suspect puts the coffin nails on UN condemnation. But what next...
 
Last edited:
.
The United States had the most to gain from this incident as it postponed a command transfer from 2012 to 2015, and saw its alliance with SK strengthen in face of deteriorating relations with China.

At the end, it's the 2 koreas that lost. NK faces another round of sanctions while SK finding itself depending even more on the United States. Lol, koreans...
 
.
The United States had the most to gain from this incident as it postponed a command transfer from 2012 to 2015, and saw its alliance with SK strengthen in face of deteriorating relations with China.

At the end, it's the 2 koreas that lost. NK faces another round of sanctions while SK finding itself depending even more on the United States. Lol, koreans...


lol koreans indeed. They are some of the most perplexing Asians on the planet. Very smart, yet very stupid and angry at the same time.

But is this little episode really a US gain? maybe, more likely they are gambling on a shift of alliance from Japan to SK given how badly the Japanese want the Marines off their island.
 
.
News from RT:



---------- Post added at 10:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 AM ----------

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
lol koreans indeed. They are some of the most perplexing Asians on the planet. Very smart, yet very stupid and angry at the same time.

But is this little episode really a US gain? maybe, more likely they are gambling on a shift of alliance from Japan to SK given how badly the Japanese want the Marines off their island.

Not going to happen, when you look at the location of the US base in Japan, it is cleared not aimed at the soviet union since they did not station their navy in hokaido, it couldn't have been intended to threaten china either since USA could not have predicted their ally KMT losing so quickly to Mao. Hence, the first role and original intention of the base is probably to keep japan under check.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom