Russian Proton-M Rocket Explodes On Take-Off

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

lol i hope Russians learnt the lesson... Next time don't buy made in China products

I'm pretty sure that they will keep buying it same as with India, that how we chinese make profit out of India...you indians learn no lessons. let do the math 12 billions, how many Proton-M we could buy?

India's trade deficit with China balloons to $12 billion - The Times of India

 

[Aegis DDG]

I'm pretty sure that they will keep buying it same as with India, that how we chinese make profit out of India...you indians learn no lessons. let do the math 12 billions, how many Proton-M we could buy?

India's trade deficit with China balloons to $12 billion - The Times of India

OT: How does China create rocket propulsion systems that are smokeless compared to NASA space vehicles?

 

[JayAtl]

Russians - you live by cheap you die by cheap. quality does not win over quantity and if you bought stuff from the US...you would not have ANOTHER made in china fail episode( at least chances would be much much lower because nobody is perfect). There is a reason for the reputation china has garnered... not because people want to troll China, rather it has a negative proven, identifiable brand reputation across majority platforms and markets. A POS by any other name is still a POS.

 

[rott]

from the article - they speak about another made in china product_ causing an accident in another launch.

Did you pull that out of your a$$? BTW, do you often get orgasms when you hear anything about Chinese products?

You seem to be obsessed with anything Chinese. Do you have anything against Chinese? Or is it because China kick your a$$ and your father's A$$ in 1962?

 

[Srinivas]

Chinese components are hazardous, Chinese tech is largely untested and you never know the truth because of restrictions.

Better go for quality or Russia should develop its own.

 

[rott]

obviously you cannot differentiate between a quote from the article vs. my personal opinions. I simply quoted what the Russians said... and in 62 you were so great that you left an entire state claimed by you and ran back. Is that the reason why you can't do Jack about Taiwan and HK . HK being handed to you and yet to see mainland rules being implemented in HK? had it not been for us you would have had a Japanese Flag as your nations flag... yeah the great Zhongguo is scary

hahahahaa.... Had it not been for who? Please be specific, coconut.
And what has 1962 to do anything with Taiwan? Unless you do know the history of China and Taiwan, which I suppose you know jackshit.
HK? What about HK? What can't we do about HK? hehe... funny guy

"yeah the great Zhongguo is scary"
Are you? hehe....

You're a fu**ing idiot!!!

 

[rott]

Since you asked -had it not been for the US , you been all birthed by japanesa, Yu Stin Ki Pu
History shows that you are all talk - Taiwan and HK over rule you Chinese.
Zhongguo is a paper dragon not worth any more than the TP we use

Had it not been for the US? According to history, had it not been for China, US would have lost the war. The Japanese Empire's military concentration was mainly fighting in China. If it wasn't for China, you would be speaking in Japanese. Get your facts right.
BTW, what does US have anything to do with you? Get back to where you belong you white wannabe. Lmao....(Silly Coconut) or atleast try being Indian and be proud of what you are. You sound like Snowden Jr. The last I checked you were arguing with some Indian member and trying to be white on the inside, whereas you are all brown on the outside.

"History shows that you are all talk"
Is it? So now you're mistaking China's patience for her weakness? I suggest you do a bit more of reading before you post a hell lot of BS. You do remember the Korean War, don't you? China and the North Koreans confronted US and her allies (15 odd countries) and using weapons from stone age (captured from Japanese and soviets). Whereas US had air dominance and extreme menacing firepower with complete "Technological Advantage". Now let me ask you this, what IF the US had to face 15 countries combined?

 

[antonius123]

Chinese components are hazardous, Chinese tech is largely untested and you never know the truth because of restrictions.

Better go for quality or Russia should develop its own.

Somebody infront has answered many times that China rocket launching is the safest one in the world, even safer than that of USA.

 

[gambit]

Had it not been for the US? According to history, had it not been for China, US would have lost the war. The Japanese Empire's military concentration was mainly fighting in China. If it wasn't for China, you would be speaking in Japanese. Get your facts right.

Ohhh...Please...Give everybody a break...!!!

Japan at that time was very much a naval power, despite presence on mainland China. Further, the Japanese Army was in India, South East Asia, as well as spread out through many island countries in the Pacific. Without the US breaking the Japanese Navy and threatening invasion of the home islands, parts of mainland China would still be under Imperial Japan today.

 

[American spying]

Ohhh...Please...Give everybody a break...!!!

Japan at that time was very much a naval power, despite presence on mainland China. Further, the Japanese Army was in India, South East Asia, as well as spread out through many island countries in the Pacific. Without the US breaking the Japanese Navy and threatening invasion of the home islands, parts of mainland China would still be under Imperial Japan today.

Wrong.

Without China, the US would have lost to Japan. It was the CPC that defeated the Japanese thus letting America finish the Japanese off. We liberated East Asia of Japan. We took the confidence after destroying Japan and destroyed the US in the Korean War.

 

[gambit]

Wrong.

Without China, the US would have lost to Japan. It was the CPC that defeated the Japanese thus letting America finish the Japanese off. We liberated East Asia of Japan. We took the confidence after destroying Japan and destroyed the US in the Korean War.

Talk about a brainwashed distortion of history...

The US have no major units on mainland China, only the Flying Tigers and all they could do was delaying the Japanese advances. What this mean is that in order to engage Japan, the US must come from the sea. When your enemy approaches from the sea, and that includes the 'island hopping' campaigns by that enemy, land based forces are useless.

The Japanese garrisons were resupplied by sea as well. Here are a few examples...

Battle of Tassafaronga - World War II - Guadalcanal Campaign

As a result, the Japanese were prevented from resupplying their forces on the island using slow cargo vessels. Assessing the situation, Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, commander of the Japanese Eighth Fleet, directed that light cruisers and destroyers carry supplies to Guadalcanal. These vessels were fast enough to make the roundtrip voyage from Japanese bases to Guadalcanal during nighttime hours. Dubbed the "Tokyo Express" by the Allies, this system of resupply proved moderately effective, but prevented the Japanese troops from transporting their heavy equipment and artillery to the island.

In the wake of the defeat, the Japanese began using submarines to carry ammunition and food to Guadalcanal.

This was vetoed by Wright who believed the range to excessive. Cole protested as his ships had an ideal firing setup. Two minutes passed before Wright gave permission. During this time, the Japanese had moved into a less ideal position. At 11:16 PM, having been made aware of the American presence, Tanaka ordered the resupply operations suspended and his ships to attack.

Without protected sea lanes, Japanese troops on these island garrisons cannot survive the same way land based armies could. For the Japanese Army, the land based units were developed from the Roman long duration self sustaining expeditionary concept...

Armies of the Imperial Japanese Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Intended to be self-sufficient for indefinite periods,...

So once the Japanese Navy were made to be on the defensive, island garrisons will fall and Imperial Japan would be defeated regardless of the land based armies could do. The Japanese home islands would be blockaded. Korea would be the end point for their return march home and they would be defeated there.

Learn some real history instead of the propaganda the Party doles out.

 

[gslv mk3]

You are incredibly misinformed.
GLSV has a mass of 640 tonnes, its payload is smaller at the proposed 10 tonne at low earth orbit and 4-5 tonne at geo-stationary but it has failed continuously to date.
Proton-M has a mass of 712 tonnes and has a much longer proven record of successful launches.

Due to the use of huge solid Rocket boosters

 

[qwerrty]

it's china fault because them russians bought chinese components from alibaba.com that aren't designed for that kind of purpose? lol this remind of the fire bricks that exploded on indian carrier not long ago. them ruskies i know that their microelectronic industry is bad, but not this bad..ha

 

[Nexus]

Facts (russia)India VS china (russia)
The India - China equation is very different from USA - Vietnam, it was USA who went into Vietnam's land to fight while India was fighting for its land under threat from China... moreover at present Vietnam does not have ill intensions or reason to cause harm to USA nor USA has any bad intension towards Vietnam, the fight between them was ideological and both decided to move forward…

For the China – India it is very different, if you look back into the 1000 years history, you will find both the countries had excellent relations and India never had any concerns of its security under threat from TIBET / China. So why this sudden change in last 50 years or little more? If you recall that same China after been beaten severely by Japan in 1930’s & Second World War has turned paranoid and xenophobic, and with the coming of power of Communist in China it became bad to worse and the communist went over drive to seize more land from its neighboring smaller countries. China annex TIBET in early 1950’s and the world did not come to its rescue except few eye brows rose and one should not forget the first attack of the combined Chinese and North Korean forces south of 38th parallel driving the south Korean & US forces up to Pusan. Then China turned its intension towards India and its greed for more land was the fall out in 1962 war.

Personally I do not believe that the India - China hatred is due to 1962 war, we had small border issues likes in 1975 & 1987 too. There may have border issues between two countries those can be resolved through negotiations. But China post 1962 always had ill intention and wanted to cause warm to India, as China did not stopped with 1962 war, then Zhou enlai in 1963 / 1964 proposed Pakistan for a jointly attack on India to cut off Kashmir[for some strange reasons Pakistan backed out from it]. In 1965 and 1971 China fully backed Pakistan in war against India. The most unfortunate and breaking point is the clandestine supply of Nuclear & Missile technology to Pakistan for sole purpose to be used against India in any future conflict, there is a very strong reason to believe that China exchanged the Uranium enrichment technology that Pakistan had stolen from Belgium / Europe with the Nuke design from China, both stand to gain from this transaction. There is intelligence report that China did carried out the Nukes tests for Pakistan behalf in 1980’s so that Pakistan does not get caught with the ghost of sanctions. It is also a well known fact that all the Pakistani missiles are Chinese origin only and China still continues to help Pakistan clandestinely to this date.

This is China for you a responsible member state of UN and that too one of the five permanent member states. China has ill intension and wants to cause harm to India there is no two thought on it. India needs to be very vigilant and cautious to China’s motives.

 

[timetravel]

then Zhou enlai in 1963 / 1964 proposed Pakistan for a jointly attack on India to cut off Kashmir[for some strange reasons Pakistan backed out from it.

Is that true?

I don't think it would be true, because Pakistan did attack India in 65 and China did not intervene.