What's new

Russian ground forces take on mujahideen in Syria

. .
index.php


Assadists fled out of Raqqa province. 15-20 kms in one day.
 
.
index.php


Assadists fled out of Raqqa province. 15-20 kms in one day.


IS cannot sustain. They have no modern arms except some AKs and PKs. Their losses are too high to be sustainable.
 
. .
What's your logic for Russian revenge since it is neither the same area nor the people?...Please check dictionary for the meanings of revenge.


Mujahideen are the same, no matter what they are ethnically, what language they speak, what country they are from, whether in Afghanistan, or in Chechnya, or in Syria. Anyone who lifts 1 finger up at the sky is a target. Russians love slaying mujahideen.
 
.
Mujahideen are the same, no matter what they are ethnically, what language they speak, what country they are from, whether in Afghanistan, or in Chechnya, or in Syria. Anyone who lifts 1 finger up at the sky is a target. Russians love slaying mujahideen.
:suicide::stop:
 
.
Mujahideen are the same, no matter what they are ethnically, what language they speak, what country they are from, whether in Afghanistan, or in Chechnya, or in Syria. Anyone who lifts 1 finger up at the sky is a target. Russians love slaying mujahideen.

From terrain to local support, to foreign support, to objectives, to mentality are different. 3000+ posts and you come up with this. Another one to add to the ignore list.
 
.
Mujahideen are the same, no matter what they are ethnically, what language they speak, what country they are from, whether in Afghanistan, or in Chechnya, or in Syria. Anyone who lifts 1 finger up at the sky is a target. Russians love slaying mujahideen.

And russians get their @ss handed to them almost every time.
 
.
And russians get their @ss handed to them almost every time.



Hardly. The US lost half a million men and won WW2. The US lost 58,000 men and lost Vietnam. It was because of leadership, not because of casualty.
 
.
Hardly. The US lost half a million men and won WW2. The US lost 58,000 men and lost Vietnam. It was because of leadership, not because of casualty.

In the first Chechen war, Russia got it's @ss whooped, even in the second one it still took them almost 10 years just to get some peace deal, and even then they had to change their terms to what the Chechens demanded. And Afghanistan, well, I don't need to bring that up...
 
.
In the first Chechen war, Russia got it's @ss whooped, even in the second one it still took them almost 10 years just to get some peace deal, and even then they had to change their terms to what the Chechens demanded. And Afghanistan, well, I don't need to bring that up...


Like I said, it was because of leadership, not because of casualty.
 
.
Like I said, it was because of leadership, not because of casualty.

Russian casualties were still damn high. In fact, in the 2nd Chechen war, after the first 3 years or so, Russia started suffering higher casualties.
 
Last edited:
.
Russian casualties were still damn high. In fact, in the 2nd Chechen war, after the first year or so, Russia started suffering higher casualties.


A few thousand KIA is in no way high.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom