What's new

Russian Coast Guard Fires At Chinese Fishing Vessel

.
$50 trillion is achievable. China's GDP will be $8 trillion this year. After one double, it's $16 trillion. After another double, it's $32 trillion. On the third double it's $64 trillion.

Using the rule of 72 for compounded gain, assuming a growth rate of 7% per year and 3% currency appreciation, China's GDP will double in 7.2 years. It would have quadrupled in 14.4 years.

China should have a $32 trillion GDP by 2027. $50 trillion is within reach.

lol, nevermind the growth is slowing and it will be slowing from now on. It's easy to post double digit growth when starting from zero. Nice exponential logic you got there too :) every economist worth his weight in salt would laugh.
 
. . .
I'm a visionary strategist. China had colluded with the United States to destroy the Soviet Union.

What's wrong with colluding with the Americans again to carve Russia into two? It's poetic justice. The Russians carved Poland into two. Why can't someone else use their strategy against them? It's only fair.

China and the U.S. only have to solve the question of neutralizing or minimizing the Russian nuclear threat. Once that problem is dealt with, carving Russia becomes a matter of where to draw the two halves.

Jesus Christ !!!
 
.
lol, nevermind the growth is slowing and it will be slowing from now on. It's easy to post double digit growth when starting from zero. Nice exponential logic you got there too :) every economist worth his weight in salt would laugh.

Since 1978, China's record of compounded growth has been consistent. I bet they can keep their 34-year growth streak going for another 14 years or more.

The massive trade surpluses keep rolling in. I see business as usual.
 
.
Lets see how China respond, its easy to bully countries like Veitnam, Phillipines etc......how about Challenging Russia.......:azn:
 
.
Lets see how China respond, its easy to bully countries like Veitnam, Phillipines etc......how about Challenging Russia.......:azn:

You settle your scores with the weak countries first. Then you move up to bigger fish when you have acquired the necessary military power.

With Russia, it'll take decades or longer. This is a waiting game.

It's a question of how far you can push your technology. Also, will it be reliable.

If you are confident, I see no reason not to strike Russia in a simultaneous attack with stealth cruise missiles at all known nuclear assets. Then you move in with everything you've got. There will be casualties, but Russia can be conquered.

It's a question of what level of damage to the homeland is acceptable.
 
. .
Since 1978, China's record of compounded growth has been consistent. I bet they can keep their 34-year growth streak going for another 14 years or more.

The massive trade surpluses keep rolling in. I see business as usual.

What is the point. Russia is veto member of P5 along with China. Any geopolitical ambitions against Russia can be countered with Russia moving towards west.

Anyway that is a long way off...US is five times Russia, but still dare not mess with Russia.

China in the next 50 yrs maybe 50 times Russia, but even china wont mess with Russia.
 
.
What is the point. Russia is veto member of P5 along with China. Any geopolitical ambitions with Russia can be countered with Russia moving towards west.

Anyway that is a long way off...US is five times Russia, but still dare not mess with Russia.

China in the next 50 yrs maybe 50 times Russia, but even china wont mess with Russia.

You are wrong. The United States is actually a squeamish country.

China is not the United States. If China decides it wants Russian in fifty years regardless of the cost, they could do it. They would build extensive underground cities to house the population. China would develop a comprehensive missile shield. China would stockpile an unimaginable number of advanced stealth cruise missiles.

China could unload its entire arsenal on the Russians and conquer them in fifty years time if they really wanted to. However, I suspect wealthy per-capita GDP Chinese in fifty years' time would have morphed into squeamish Americans.

Poor Chinese can do it. Rich Chinese? I doubt it, but it's theoretically possible.

You Indians simply do not understand the Chinese Will. If we really want to do something and there's a consensus, it will happen.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom