What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . . .
There is zero chance Russia is deploying one of the few Su-57 above Ukraine. How do you even know what kind of missile this is? You just dont care, do you?

Su-57 is armed with Kh-59MK2 stand off missiles. Range nearly 300 km. Out of reach of Ukrainian air defense, which only has a few MANPADS left since S-300 and Buk were all blown up.
 
.

Russia has warned the West that cyber-attacks on its infrastructure significantly increase the risk of a direct military clash with unpredictable consequences.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said that state institutions in Russia are being subjected to cyber attacks, and blamed people in the United States and Ukraine.
@CNBCArabia
 
. . .
Su-57 is armed with Kh-59MK2 stand off missiles. Range nearly 300 km. Out of reach of Ukrainian air defense, which only has a few MANPADS left since S-300 and Buk were all blown up.
Whats wrong with all the other missiles in Russias inventory, since they need to use Su-57 as a platform striking Ukraine now? They are not using the Su-57 because they hardly have any, and theyre not going to risk the embarrassment it would be loosing one.
 
. .
Again, talk to that idiot who I replied to and say "It's great to have the ice melted in Siberia, more land for farming".
Holy shit you take things out of context
Well, not being a geologist or a Doctor in Environmental Science, but I can tell you there are no way whatever melting in Siberia that Russia can contain or retain on the ground, in case you are wondering, there are 6.5 million square kilometre of ice in Siberia, even if half of those melt, you are talking about the 6 times the water volume of Black Sea (Which is about 550,000 sq km of water body) or 30 times the entire landmass of Greece (not just the marshland you are yapping about) . Good luck retaining that amount of water that on the ground.

By the way, it spell field "MARSHAL(L)" not Martial. Talk about nosing around in things you have zero information about.

This is the result of all that googling ?
A pick at a spelling mistake while making a grammatical mistake in making that point.... Nice.
Where do rivers end up ?
Do you know the meaning of an Estuary?
How are lakes filled ?
Rise in sea levels at the behest of open sea lanes for Russia ?
Is Siberia all plain land ? No.
So will all this area be swamp or Marshlands. No.
Do you know how they clear marshlands for agriculture ?
They dig waterways... Specifically earth lined canals in which water generally seeps into. These can further feed concrete canals which can transfer water to European parts of Russia,
Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and other countries for agriculture purposes. As more arable land would be required in central asian countries to compensate for the depleting crop production in Southern countries...
Before calling me an idiot stop considering Siberia a plate of leftover mashed potatoes you just microwaved.
The permafrost will gradually melt and Russia of all countries facing climate change would have the most time to fight it.
Did you just compare the water held by a water body i.e black sea to Siberia ?
How can you consider
Stop thinking of Siberia as a huge icicle
that will melt and turn to mush.
Global Warming is a pressing matter no doubt.
Seal levels will be the least of the World's concerns...
Droughts and Extreme temperatures will be a more pressing matter. With countries in the southern hemisphere facing the toughest times including mine.

Your knowledge doesn't take into consideration the the geography of Siberia at all.
Even in one of the coldest areas of Siberia such as Yakutia. The thawing of the permafrost has resulted in opening up of ground water reserves and pastures.
 
. .
Russian propagandists trying to define the rules while none apply to Russia.
Its all over. The western world is done hoping for Russia becomming a trusted civilized nation under Putin. Europe is going to distance itself from Russia for decades no matter how many times Putin and his gang is going to remind us how dangerous they think they are.
 
.
Whats wrong with all the other missiles in Russias inventory, since they need to use Su-57 as a platform striking Ukraine now? They are not using the Su-57 because they hardly have any, and theyre not going to risk the embarrassment it would be loosing one.

France deployed 4 Rafale in 2011 to topple Gaddafi. Russia has 5 Su-57 operational. It's a small number but sufficient to smash Ukraine's one and only Harpoon truck. Modern war is low intensity war. Ukraine only has low dozens artillery in total. 5 Su-57 is sufficient in quantity to smash all of them within days. Su-57 uses Kh-59MK2 long range stand off fire and forget missiles. No Ukrainian air defence has the range to danger Su-57 from hundreds of kilometers away.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom