What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Russians retreating from Kharkiv is very telling, they didn't have enough men to reinforce or those troops were not motivated to stay. Read the Russians are going to use troops from Syria to make up the losses.

And they are getting more, and more troops in a smaller, and smaller territory, making them area targets.
 
. . .
Russia will update the figure at a time of her choosing. But if this takes place very soon, in all logic the updated number might be below or close to 3000.



Not sure what responsibility you're referring to, but compared to western regimes the Russian government has had continuously better approval rates, approval rates which increased again to exceed 70% since the start of the military intervention in Ukraine. I find no reason why this should change in the foreseeable future.



What are such random anecdotes supposed to prove? And I wonder what country this is, where the wealthier segments of citizenry are making up the bulk of the armed forces? Certainly that country isn't located in the west. A considerable percentage of lower ranking soldiers in the US army cite the pay as their prime motivation for joining the military.
Eventually the somewhat enlightend part of Russia is going to be affected by the war in Ukraine, and they wont be able to excuse themself with being apolical or pretending being delusional. I was hoping Putin was declaring mobilisation, forcing the apolitical russian middle class to send its children off to Ukraine.
The approval rates in a defacto dictatorship is worthless. Most people disaproving simply refuse to participate. It doesnt tell us anything.
 
. . . . . . . .
The Afghan people lost, not the US military.

You see the difference today for a people that fight for their country(Ukrainians ) and ones that won’t (Afghans).

You really believe the propaganda nonsense that you're putting out. Without any power assisting them with guided anti-tank weapons, artilleries, drones, and fighter jets, the Afghan people defeated the NATO alliance. That is a fact that you can't escape from. The US and NATO were forced to negotiate with the same Taliban that they were trying to uproot to the point where that same organization is the government in Afghanistan today. And that is what Congressman Matt Gaetz acknowledged.
 
.
The Afghan people lost, not the US military.

You see the difference today for a people that fight for their country(Ukrainians ) and ones that won’t (Afghans).
The Afghan people won, they kick invaders out of their land. Now, they will decide for themself where to go without external intervention.
 
. .
You really believe the propaganda nonsense that you're putting out. Without any power assisting them with guided anti-tank weapons, artilleries, drones, and fighter jets, the Afghan people defeated the NATO alliance. That is a fact that you can't escape from. The US and NATO were forced to negotiate with the same Taliban that they were trying to uproot to the point where that same organization is the government in Afghanistan today. And that is what Congressman Matt Gaetz acknowledged.


The US could have stayed in Afghanistan till the end of time. It left because it no longer wanted to hold the hands of the Afghan people. The Afghan people lost. The US also achieved its objective of annihilating Al Qaeda.

The Afghans lost because they won’t fight for their future. They’d rather live in backwardness.

Ukrainians on the other hand, choose freedom and advancement as a country, rather than being subjugated by the backwards Russians.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom