Foinikas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
- Messages
- 12,710
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
For exampleNo, as long as they are not duplicates. Fake news are fine. Repeating fake news are not.
A friend sent me this
I did a reverse image search
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For exampleNo, as long as they are not duplicates. Fake news are fine. Repeating fake news are not.
Pakistan should ask these European envoys to first get India onboard. We are nobodys on the International Stage.
New Recruit
Pakistan should ask these European envoys to first get India onboard. We are nobodys on the International Stage.
Then they should commit to raising the Kashmiri cause in UN first, then we'll get onboard the RusCondemnation train.
One more:
Ukraine NOT becoming a NATO member is now fighting for its very own existence against Russia.
If we open a thread for debunked fake news, it will be probably almost the size of this Thread.Should we have a separate thread for Ukrainian fake news?
Since am Air Force, F-111 Cold War then F-16 Desert Storm, am going to give you an air force perspective.
Just because you think and perceive some attacks as indiscriminate that does not mean they were. Can the USAF truly go indiscriminate? Yes, but why would we? We do not need 'indiscriminate' to induce fear into enemy forces, we certainly did not in Desert Storm. Even with the manufacturing might of the US, and we hauled everything we needed from the Western Hemisphere, any air commander who went truly indiscriminate would lose his stars or eagles. Even if we trapped a division of enemy troops into an area with no civilians, to go truly 'indiscriminate' would still be stupid and wasteful. If we can drop 10 bombs into a specific point in that trap to induce surrender why the hell would we drop 1000 bombs indiscriminately when 10 bombs did the job?
As far as spinning the Russian performance so far...Good job...But...
Have you consider the possibility that the reason why Russia have not done any 'shock and awe' is because they cannot, not because they would not? When you split your invasion plan three-ways, so are your logistic lines: 3 ways. Then once the war is underway, you let your air commanders allocate how each conduct his part of the invasion plan. You do not, or should not, micro manage.
What if -- just what if -- there were no Russian equivalent of 'shock and awe' is because each air commander do not have sufficient munition to create the initial 'shock and awe' effect and still have enough to conduct the rest of the war?What if -- just what if -- each air commander does have sufficient munition to create three versions of 'shock and awe' but Poutine underestimated Ukrainian resistance and micro managed his air commanders to restrain themselves?
Both versions of 'what if' constitute strategic errors that ended with what the world is seeing today -- that the Russian military was flawed and inefficient in its execution of the war. You do not see 'indiscriminate' bombing, like the American way of war, so that mean the Russian military is more humane? Damn...!!! Talk about swallowing propaganda.
More from him, for our "Experts" here, who say russia is losing and so on:
Could you please elaborate for non-tech-savvy like myself?
I'm starting to think the Ghost of Kiev is that Indian pilot with the '70s pornstar moustache.
View attachment 819923
Now you too can be the Ghost of Kyiv!I'm starting to think the Ghost of Kiev is that Indian pilot with the '70s pornstar moustache.
View attachment 819923