Not to mention the cloud cover, can't bomb through clouds what they can't see.Wow - they are using dumb bombs - explains their losses from low level attacks for sure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to mention the cloud cover, can't bomb through clouds what they can't see.Wow - they are using dumb bombs - explains their losses from low level attacks for sure.
At whatever location Russian forces finally stops and starts consolidation, media will term as west succeed in halting Russian advance. Even if Russia takes control of entire Ukraine ( which I don't think is the objective here), west will say we saved poland et alI think this thread has lost some important perspective.
Russia is at war with a technologically near peer adversary. Despite being 10 times larger and more numerous, it is performing an invasion into Ukrainian home turf. This means the logistics problem is mostly for Russia. Supply lines for this is easy since it is right next door and they have Belarus. Meanwhile Ukraine has also benefited from supply increases before the war and also during of western arms.
Russia losing stuff is to be expected. They are making progress on control of regions. We don't see much of what Ukraine has been losing but the losing control of land shows enough. It would be total loss on Ukrainian side for loss of land or if strategic pull back, then defeated by Russian side. Just to be objective about it.
Maybe some (and this is pushed by media) expected that Russia would have minimal loss or something.
This is an occupation invasion, and a very intense one and fast paced. In Iraq, US took about 2 weeks for control over it and Ukraine is far stronger than Iraq with the military capability between Iraq and then USA compared to Ukraine and Russia now being far greater as well.
The right sector that has been armed and weaponised by the West is enough to spread havoc in the EU.Let Russia do it. What groups will this be?
Yes - strong meth vibes from Eastern Europe and now they will have anti tank weapons and stingersThe right sector that has been armed and weaponised by the West is enough to spread havoc in the EU.
Just give it a few years and everyone will be able to witness the EUs equivalent of Kalashinkov culture.
Not abandon just not part of Russia itself, something akin to Belarus, or Kazakhstan.LOL! Considering what happened in the past wars with superpowers like in Vietnam and Afghanistan, I'm surprised you think they should surrender after all the deaths and destruction. And what makes you think Putin would abandon the country he conquers?
Or spread into Russia as well...The right sector that has been armed and weaponised by the West is enough to spread havoc in the EU.
Just give it a few years and everyone will be able to witness the EUs equivalent of Kalashinkov culture.
LOL sure!Not abandon just not part of Russia itself, something akin to Belarus, or Kazakhstan.
I am sure the Brits are thanking their lucky stars for Brexit.Yes - strong meth vibes from Eastern Europe and now they will have anti tank weapons and stingers
You still don't get it.Might is right. This is what you saying? And you are fine with it that the country you are serving is nothing but a sham, a con-artist, a pathetic tyrant? And you are fine with the fact that the country you are serving is committing genocides around the world?
The rest of the world might not be as resourceful (propaganda wise) but will hear no more lectures from those hyenas! I agree, our countries should take a clue and abandon these "democracy" dramas. Learn from the West if you want to develop yourself!
In the meanwhile deal with Putin, we aint taking no sides. Time, and not propaganda, will tell how it ends...
It seems you didn't really pay attention to what he wrote.
You're doing a poor attempt at shaming him, because what you said is simply ridiculous.
@MusingsFor those who have not seen this site - useful to track what being reported as lost for the Russian side : https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html
Excellent link.For those who have not seen this site - useful to track what being reported as lost for the Russian side : https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html
That's what NATO will try to do.Or spread into Russia as well...
LOL sure!
Sorry it took me so long to get to this, been rather busy. I agree that this war can’t really be compared to others in recent history, but at the same time, in my opinion, it doesn’t compare too much to the Pakistan-india theatre either. Maybe it would be comparable if Ukraine and Russia had both made certain decisions; on Ukraines part it would have been to prepare for an invasion properly, and on Russias part it would have been to carry out said invasion properly.In genuine honesty, I don't think we can compare the Russian/Ukraine war with any wars in the recent past (those were fairly one-sided, with the Western powers enjoying a lop-sided advantage).
Given that Russian armor is facing somewhat modern weaponry at hands of Ukrainians and suffering due to it, where does that put our usage of armor, given Indian anti-armor capability? This is what I am most interested in knowing more about.
Do you anticipate Pakistan or India making fewer logistical, and operational mistakes than Russians or Ukrainians? (Keeping in mind events of Feb 26 and 27th both).
And I am tagging @PanzerKiel since he's written a lot about mistakes from 65', 71' wars. I'd love to know what he thinks of the current situation here and if it tells us anything about what the future might be like at our end.