Daylamite Warrior
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2021
- Messages
- 797
- Reaction score
- -79
- Country
- Location
There has to be consent between a Muslim captor and slave, rape of slaves was punishable by death and the slave was freed in Islamic law. Mutah is forbidden in Sunni Islam so again youre strawmanning us. Mutah in shiaism is also consentual and requires a contract, so again you're the one with false claims.Do you really want to start a religious debate here by making such false claims?
And what household?
This household in which a captive lady is raped by the owner, and once fulfilling her sexual lust in a Temporary Sexual Relationship (like Shia Muta), he was allowed to sell the captive lady to another owner, who again raped her and sold her to the 3rd owner for raping her .... ?
Jews and Christians were also notorious for slavery, but at least they had to marry the captive women in order to have sex with her, and after the marriage, she became like a regular wife, and could not be sold further after the temporary sexual Muta type relationship.
The credit of freeing humanity from slavery goes neither to Islam, nor to any other religion, but only and only to the modern humanist movement of the West.
Dont lie, western slaves were systematically raped, as were Muslim captives under Christian crusades. Then they were killed in the case of the crusades. Freeing of slaves as a virtue and act of worship is riddled throughout the Quran and Sunnah...so humanists clearly are copying Islamic values.