The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at 2 posts above. Russia imports from Italy crashes by 50 percent and you say Russia economy is going well? You are delusional. The western sanctions alone can’t explain the collapse.Well well. With time it doesn't look so bad for Russia anymore:
1. Russian economy held up rather well. Conversely, EU economy didn't. The Russians are already used to privations from past sanctions, the EU isn't.
2. Russian military losses seem manageable now. The Ukrainian depends on donated military equipment, the Russian produce themselves.
It is only a matter of time the EU part will shackle the military part( NATO). The cracks are already showing as members are either backing out( Switzerland funds) or diluting the sanctions using legal language to mask it. Because the NATO are mostly " democracy " and sooner or later their public will punish the rulers for the economic turmoil.
This episode must also be very encouraging for the Chinese. Whereas in the beginning the Chinese became totally silent, they are starting to find their mojo again. Because they saw that the NATO, 5 Eyes, EU or whatever will lose an economic war that got stalemated with a lesser power like Russia.
Meanwhile i am wondering why Russia did not cover the skies of Ukraine with armed drones and decimate their artillery , tanks and logistics the way Azerbaijan did to Armenia??? No need to duke it out on the ground..
I love the reply with the kitty
Chinas imports from Lithuania " crashed " 90% so China must be the loser??Look at 2 posts above. Russia imports from Italy crashes by 50 percent and you say Russia economy is going well? You are delusional. The western sanctions alone can’t explain the collapse.
NonsenseChinas imports from Lithuania " crashed " 90% so China must be the loser??
You are the delusional wannabe White boy. You will always remain a gook for them
Well well. With time it doesn't look so bad for Russia anymore:
1. Russian economy held up rather well. Conversely, EU economy didn't. The Russians are already used to privations from past sanctions, the EU isn't.
2. Russian military losses seem manageable now. The Ukrainian depends on donated military equipment, the Russian produce themselves.
It is only a matter of time the EU part will shackle the military part( NATO). The cracks are already showing as members are either backing out( Switzerland funds) or diluting the sanctions using legal language to mask it. Because the NATO are mostly " democracy " and sooner or later their public will punish the rulers for the economic turmoil.
This episode must also be very encouraging for the Chinese. Whereas in the beginning the Chinese became totally silent, they are starting to find their mojo again. Because they saw that the NATO, 5 Eyes, EU or whatever will lose an economic war that got stalemated with a lesser power like Russia.
Meanwhile i am wondering why Russia did not cover the skies of Ukraine with armed drones and decimate their artillery , tanks and logistics the way Azerbaijan did to Armenia??? No need to duke it out on the ground..
after they shot down a whole squadron of tb2 another one miraculously shows up lmaoAmazing how Russians keep shooting down Ukrainian fighters despite the fact that according to their own propaganda they've already destroyed Ukrainian air force twice.
Noone is poisoned by Smoke Grenades and the Wikipedia link states that it is not an Incendiary Weapon.
Your sources does not support your view,
You source say that if White Phosphorus is used for its toxilogical effect (what toxilogical effect?) it is considered a chemical weapon because of how the treaty on chemical weapon is written.My source, a legal expert, states explicitly that if used as a weapon, its legal status changes accordingly. Only its incendiary properties make it a potential weapon (and in effect, during WW1 it saw extensive employment as an incendiary weapon intended to kill and injure personnel). And that's the common take by jurists.
Am USAF, F-111 Cold War then F-16 Desert Storm. But before the USAF, I learned how to fly when I was in high school, in a Cessna 152, and this was in the early 1980s. I grew up in Hawaii and flew over Pearl Harbor.I shared a link where an informed analyst suggests otherwise because it was not only turning the plane.
Chinas imports from Lithuania " crashed " 90% so China must be the loser??
You are the delusional wannabe White boy. You will always remain a gook for them