Ali_Baba
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 27, 2018
- Messages
- 6,417
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Then it is all unverified.
Russia version will be more credulius since the evidence is with them. The warship itself.
Daily Mail is from just from one single photo and that is flimsy.
A single photo of a man next to the car that was destroyed and he is condemned as an arsonist.
So why are you insisting that your version is right.
You have to prove it to us using more scientific argument then instead by spreading someone else version with a photo which to many of us already knew but the rest are just US or UK Propaganda.
Given how Russia has lied every single day about everything - the Russian account means little right now.
You are welcome to believe the Russian "version" of events, and I will believe the West's.
Given that the "west" has been more right than wrong on this war - I feel comfortable i have the right sequence of events of what has happened.
There are 3 possibilities:
1- The cruiser was hit by two missiles and its ammunition depot exploded
2- There is treachery and internal work that led to the destruction of the warehouse on the cruiser
3- Unexplained fire caused an explosion
Wow if you go frame by frame at about 1.5secs - you can see the missile strike the ship !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!