Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

[RescueRanger]

Reports that a Russian tank column is moving northwards from Mariopol towards Zaporizhzhia
Source: Ali Adnan - TRT News Live.

 

[Daniel808]

Romainian ship and it was hit by Russians.

It’s Moldavian ship and it was hit by Ukraine.

If that Romanian ship, NATO would be barking at this moment.

The ship is a chemical tanker named MV Millennial Spirit. You can check by yourself instead reading Ukraines propaganda tweet.


The crew itself are Russian Federation Citizens

 

[RescueRanger]

Reports that a Russian tank column is moving northwards from Mariopol towards Zaporizhzhia
Source: Ali Adnan - TRT News Live.

View attachment 818530

Important to mention here that once the Russians make it to Zaporizhzhia and Dnipro the east of Ukraine is essentially cut off.

 

[obj 705A]

And have you not been following that it was Russia who made a WRITTEN promise back in 1994 not to attack Ukraine?

And then in 2014 what happened? A US orchestrated coup d'etat.
Regime change happened in which a neutral government was replaced with a heavily anti Russia leadership hell-bent on joining NATO, all promises are dead after the regime change.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Poor those Nazis wanabee in Azov batallion

Chechen would slaughter those facist

View attachment 818519

where I saw , NATO banner previously , yes it was Georgian president when he was peeing himself .
what's with these people and that banner

 

[Dalit]

View attachment 818523

Man, what a laughing stock.

 

[Asian.Century]

 

[Paul2]

Germany is a free country. They are free enough to become dependent on Russia for energy.

You put that excellently

 

[Daniel808]

This aircraft claimed to be a Russian aircraft downed last night in the centre of Kiev would upon closer examination appear to be an Ukranian Su 27
View attachment 818525

View attachment 818526
View attachment 818527

A few hours ago, those Ukraine propagandist still insist that a Russian Su-27.

Even it’s clear as fvck, that’s an Ukraine one

 

[Dalit]

It is the truth. So much muscle flexing. So much noise. In the end, Ukraine is all alone and abandoned. Just like the Kurds. Just like the Afghans. Just like the Iraqis. Anyone who chooses US side always stands alone. It is an eye opener.

 

[Rana4pak]

Russia made a WRITTEN promise not to attack Ukraine. It does not have legal bindings, but from 1994 to now, the current Ukrainian government inherited that promise and when you compare the security from nuclear weapons to a document that have no legal authority, what Ukraine did was shocking. Nuclear weapons security is an assurance that no one want to put to test.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine held about one third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, the third largest in the world at the time, as well as significant means of its design and production.[2] 130 UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) with six warheads each, 46 RT-23 Molodets ICBMs with ten warheads apiece, as well as 33 heavy bombers, totaling approximately 1,700 warheads remained on Ukrainian territory.[3] Formally, these weapons were controlled by the Commonwealth of Independent States.[4] In 1994 Ukraine agreed to destroy the weapons, and to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).​

​

Imagine the enormity of what Ukraine did. They gave up 1,700 nuclear warheads -- PERMANENTLY -- just because Russia made a NON-LEGAL promise not to attack. Do you really think they care TODAY about who promised yrs ago that NATO would not expand east in a non-legal notebook?

Would your Pakistan willing to give up just 10, not 1700, nuclear warheads if India make a non-legal promise not to attack?

 

[RescueRanger]

It is the truth. So much muscle flexing. So much noise. In the end, Ukraine is all alone and abandoned. Just like the Kurds. Just like the Afghans. Just like the Iraqis. Anyone who chooses US side always stands alone. It is an eye opener.

When all the bluster comes tumbling down:

 

[QWECXZ]

I agree with your list except France they are the worst..

Did you know Macron was willing to surrender east-europe to Russia? Few weeks ago he suggested them pulling out of the nato eastern flank.. Lmao I couldn't believe when I heard that

Throwing Ukraine under the bus is different from not being capable to defend one's self. France is one of the permanent members of the UNSC armed with nuclear triad and pretty decent military equipment with a long established military industry and one of the world's leading aerospace industries. France is also one of the leading countries in nuclear enrichment and reprocessing. Macron has been talking about expanding French military for several years, ever since Trump talked about US abandoning NATO, and unlike Germany, they do plan to ramp up their nuclear industry.

This is how I see it personally: US >> UK ~ France > Turkey

 

[Patriot forever]

Russia made a WRITTEN promise not to attack Ukraine. It does not have legal bindings, but from 1994 to now, the current Ukrainian government inherited that promise and when you compare the security from nuclear weapons to a document that have no legal authority, what Ukraine did was shocking. Nuclear weapons security is an assurance that no one want to put to test.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine held about one third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal, the third largest in the world at the time, as well as significant means of its design and production.[2] 130 UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) with six warheads each, 46 RT-23 Molodets ICBMs with ten warheads apiece, as well as 33 heavy bombers, totaling approximately 1,700 warheads remained on Ukrainian territory.[3] Formally, these weapons were controlled by the Commonwealth of Independent States.[4] In 1994 Ukraine agreed to destroy the weapons, and to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).​

​

Imagine the enormity of what Ukraine did. They gave up 1,700 nuclear warheads -- PERMANENTLY -- just because Russia made a NON-LEGAL promise not to attack. Do you really think they care TODAY about who promised yrs ago that NATO would not expand east in a non-legal notebook?

Would your Pakistan willing to give up just 10, not 1700, nuclear warheads if India make a non-legal promise not to attack?

Let's keep aside political subconvential manoeuvres by the West that violated Ukrainian sovereignty in the first place that set off the cascade of events.

Bringing in NATO to Ukraine defeats the very purpose Russia agreed to not attack Ukraine.

Remove Ukrainian nukes and replace them with NATO offensive capability and nukes at the border with Russia. Does that sentence makes sense.

You are seeing everything in a literal sense removing the logic to give it self serving meaning.

You need to understand the thought process and logic.

If one forbids to enter his house you don't go through the window and lawyer up saying the arrangement only meant through the front door.

 

[khail007]

what jet is that almost at the end?

Sir G, seems to be Su-25 Frogfoot (CAS). Refer below:

Su-25 (Su-28) Frogfoot Close-Support Aircraft - Airforce Technology

The Su-25 single-seat, close-support aircraft, known by the NATO reporting name Frogfoot, is manufactured by the Sukhoi Design Bureau Joint…

www.airforce-technology.com