Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For US, we have these:not sure about the Russian Air Force, but from a ground perspective. The reason behind the downfall of Russian Military might is corruption.
Saw a Pentagon auditor report on Russian ground vehicle. Most of their tire are cheap Chinese Brand. It's nothing wrong with Cheap Chinese Brand, if you maintain it frequently, but then they didn't. Which mean they are overpressure, and started to flake, all those tires got blown up suggest widespread corruption within the rank of Russian Military.
Why? If you want to "Cheap Skate" your equipment and take that cut, you wouldn't go cheap skate important stuff, like the weapon system or armour. But you would cheap skate item such as Engine Oil, Tires, Transmission and so on. The thing is, if you cut corner on weapon system and armour, that can be spotted miles away, tires and transmission is hard to spot, this is where these people will take a cut there and cut corner. I mean, $40,000 for 8 APC Tires and if you are using $20,000 Chinese brand, you pocket $20,000 just 1 APC, think about Russia have around 5000 or more of those, how much money we are talking about?
I don't really know enough on the Air Force to comment on it, but I would assume they will have similar problem with the ground force.
Arming Ukrainian during war is indeed an escalation.. from the perspective of Russia.Arming Ukrainian is NOT an escalation, Sweden wasn't in NATO either, so what compel the Swede to send NLAW and AT-4? when are Russia going to send some ICBM Swedish way?
Again, you are funny, sending ICBM to some country is NOT an escalation, while sending arms to another country in a hot war is?? I really want to know if you know anything about Logic??
I think training has a big impact as well - the tactics and usage of their equipment seemed completely all over the place and not reflective of good use of their firepower nor numbers.not sure about the Russian Air Force, but from a ground perspective. The reason behind the downfall of Russian Military might is corruption.
Saw a Pentagon auditor report on Russian ground vehicle. Most of their tire are cheap Chinese Brand. It's nothing wrong with Cheap Chinese Brand, if you maintain it frequently, but then they didn't. Which mean they are overpressure, and started to flake, all those tires got blown up suggest widespread corruption within the rank of Russian Military.
Why? If you want to "Cheap Skate" your equipment and take that cut, you wouldn't go cheap skate important stuff, like the weapon system or armour. But you would cheap skate item such as Engine Oil, Tires, Transmission and so on. The thing is, if you cut corner on weapon system and armour, that can be spotted miles away, tires and transmission is hard to spot, this is where these people will take a cut there and cut corner. I mean, $40,000 for 8 APC Tires and if you are using $20,000 Chinese brand, you pocket $20,000 just 1 APC, think about Russia have around 5000 or more of those, how much money we are talking about?
I don't really know enough on the Air Force to comment on it, but I would assume they will have similar problem with the ground force.
Arming Ukrainian is NOT an escalation, Sweden wasn't in NATO either, so what compel the Swede to send NLAW and AT-4? when are Russia going to send some ICBM Swedish way?
Again, you are funny, sending ICBM to some country is NOT an escalation, while sending arms to another country in a hot war is?? I really want to know if you know anything about Logic??
Not really, NATO will focus on other threats like a future conflict in the middle east or against China. NATO is no longer about “North Atlantic” and more about western civilization power vs the rest of the worldIt's true the war exposed NATO hyping up Russia as a threat.. it is hardly a threat to anyone. Hence NATO should be dissolved, or atleast drawn down
lol, arming and training Ukrainian is not an escalation when there is ALREADY a war happening. So does Sanction or economic hostilities. Because what you are essentially referring to as who did what first. And in this case, Australia did not start this war. So whoever is starting this war is the one that first raise the tension and escalated. Without the war, would you think Australia will send those Bushmaster to begin with?? Saying sending weapon is an escalation from the Russian perspective is like the war itself have no implication on the Russian to begin with...Arming Ukrainian during war is indeed an escalation.. from the perspective of Russia.
Sending ICBM to the country arming your enemy is also a counter escalation, I never said it is not.
Great investigative work. Creepy music in the background. Very haunting
Those men look like the DNR militia, who are Pro Russian forces. They live and settle in Eastern Ukraine. The Ukrainians can't go nowhere near the main Russian army.
Those men look like the DNR militia, who are Pro Russian forces. They live and settle in Eastern Ukraine. The Ukrainians can't go nowhere near the main Russian army.