jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Actually it did."The insurgency they are going to face " has nothing to "defeat the Ukrainian in a timely fashion" , example are Iraq and Afghanistan ...
IMO for russians is better to kill defenders in long war while the lines are clear rather than take cities in timely fashion and then have to deal with defender in a long term insurgency ...
by moving slowly , most of Ukrainian who have will to fight them , already take arms and join defensive lines and Russians are going to kill and decimate them in a classical war ...
The longer it take for the country to overturn a government, the shorter the time for the insurgency to defeat the occupation. case in point, look at US involvement in Vietnam and its subsequent insurgency and the Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan and its subsequence insurgency with Mujahedeen
As for whether or not Russia is better to kill defender in long war, well, I would have to politely disagree with you. The longer the war drag on, the more time Ukrainian can post a more meaningful defence, you don't drag on an invasion unless you have to, because it give the defender time to consolidate their position. Which translate to more kinetic loss for the invader, Unless you are telling me the Russian fancy losing more people than they should, they are not going to look for a drawn out war. Every passing second you have more resource flow into Ukraine and Ukrainian are being armed and trained