Wood
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 4,839
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Epic trolling. Tacticool is a nice word
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Epic trolling. Tacticool is a nice word
OK u are entitled to your opinion. But all great journeys begin with the 1st step. They foundations are laid and the journey startedI honestly don't think so.
A replacement for Dollar denominated system would mean whatever currency that is going to replace the USD would have to have MORE circulation than USD, and that is before US call in EU for help, then you are not looking at 61% reserve, but closer to 90% world reserve. Can a single currency do that without bankrupting their own economy?
Look at it this way, RMB is currently at 1.2% world reserve basket, they will need to expand at least 60 times to overrun USD (which is at 61.2%) that expanding may have been possible in the next 100 years if RMB have a complete currency reform (nobody are going to willing to trade a currency that is controlled by the government) I do not see China can do that without seriously deflate their own currency.
Either that or a third world war happened and nobody but China survive. Which is how US get to dominate world currency back after WW2.
The Overall effect of the war should boost rearmament across the west. Short term this will strengthen US power through NATO. Long-term; european rearmament would cause the west to become more polycentric as european nations should gradually discover their own interest independent from the US. A world with Strong regional Powers with a Strong US and a Strong China with the regional powers serving as mediators between the two would actually be more stable than the current Unipolar to Bipolar transition that is going on at present.
I saw the film of the US secretary of state at the time (Baker?) , using those words. The Russians have always felt that they have been betrayed. There's endless academics saying the same thing.
Well, as Gorbachev himself explained, the word quoted from Baker was out of context, he (Gorbachev) said what Baker said is to the extend there will not be NATO troop moving east (to East Germany) as long as Soviet Union Troop is there, only Interior Police are allowed to move East to secure those position held by Soviet Union.I saw the film of the US secretary of state at the time (Baker?) , using those words. The Russians have always felt that they have been betrayed. There's endless academics saying the same thing.
Well the Russian leadership, and a whole bunch of academics believe different. We'll leave it at that.Well, as Gorbachev himself explained, the word quoted from Baker was out of context, he (Gorbachev) said what Baker said is to the extend there will not be NATO troop moving east (to East Germany) as long as Soviet Union Troop is there, only Interior Police are allowed to move East to secure those position held by Soviet Union.
As I said, I am not there, and you probably were not there, and lacking of official agreement, there are no way to know what has been said and in what context those thing has been said. And Gorbachev was there, and this is how he interpreted it.
So Believe it or not is up to you.
That promise is a faith. The government is asking you to have a faith in it. It will break it from time to time but you need to have a faith in it. That is why it is nothing concrete, certainly not a guarantee. Like Nixon said, "The dollar is our currency but it is your problem."
Russia and Soviet Union are two different things! If they feel betrayed, why did they signed the Belovezh Accords??I saw the film of the US secretary of state at the time (Baker?) , using those words. The Russians have always felt that they have been betrayed. There's endless academics saying the same thing.
It is a faith you give to the one who controls the supply.How is it "faith" when it was dictated by Supply AND Demand. If it is one and not the other, then maybe, but as a first year economic student will tell you, you don't get to be in charge of both.
Which mean there are no "Faith" in it, and that is why I said I am better off not knowing your "Money Jargon"
Well the Russian leadership, and a whole bunch of academics believe different. We'll leave it at that.
Which part of "AND" you don't understand??It is a faith you give to the one who controls the supply.
This could be fake news. Russia has trans-Siberian railways that can transport these trucks (and in far more larger number) to border with Ukraine within a week, by ship the journey would take a month.Will Turkey let these ships in? Technically - the home port for these ships is not in the black sea ?!
Russian warships pass through Japan strait, possibly on way to Ukraine
Russia could be sending reinforcements to Ukraine, Japan's defense ministry said after spotting four amphibious warships in the Tsugaru Strait (pictured). Russia has lost thousands of vehicles.www.dailymail.co.uk
and Iraq had WMD!
This is a conservative estimate