Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean they’ll keep taking back their territory as they have been.
What’s Russia going to do
Your predictions and “screenshot this” expertise has been wrong on every occasion.NATO is low on men, money, ammunition, good rail network, good military vehicles, so this is wise.
True, but hopefully not, they have to duke it out conventional- but NATO will lose alot of soldiers either way, for one, because of lack of element of surprise- Russia is already in a war, so that makes Russia already prepared, but NATO countries just have postures and forces hanging out- are they REALLY REALLY ready to die for an attempt to use Ukraine as their next proxy?
but Russia has destroyed so many of the Ukranians, its increasingly fighting NATO- just as mercenaries for now, but still...NATO forces are getting closer and their citizens are fighting in larger numbers- and if you really think Russia is low enough on ammunition that its not prepared for NATO, you will will learn the hard way.
Your predictions and “screenshot this” expertise has been wrong on every occasion.
This trash “analysis” falls in the same bin.
Nato has 3 million standing army. Yet “running out of men”
Hilarious
Nice. That's why Russia win in Syria with a tinpot black smoke spewing old carrier.
Bullshit.Stop bluffing. That time has long passed. NATO did nothing when actual help was required. Even the Ukrainians have openly lambasted US/NATO for doing nothing.
Russia has thousands of nukes. (Apart from a considerable standing army, though conventionally no near peer)Your 3 million standing army has only stood and watched the spectacle. That is the bitter truth.
Even now the Polish are saying one thing and the US president something else. You need to admit the reality. Russia isn't Iraq/Afghanistan. You won't attack Russia directly with force because Russia has the ability to strike back and even start a World War.
US saying it wasn’t Russian missiles
Likely an S-300 missile
Bullshit.
Without western money, intel, military support Ukraine would have been overrun instead of retaking 50% of the territory russia occupied.
Ukranians ofcourse always like to see more help…however they are not a Nato member.
Russia has thousands of nukes. (Apart from a considerable standing army, though conventionally no near peer)
Ukraine is not a nato member.
So in that context….Ofcourse Nato is not rushing to start worldwar/nuclear holocaust to “look tough”. What are you…an 8 year old?
Nah, the real problem is the West fear their domination of the World being lost to an Asian power. China does not export their political system to the World, while the West is pushing their democracy to the World like the Jesus preachers did to the native "savages" in their colonies.
It is not about EXPORTING only, China is always on the other side of equation on human rights.
For example, if West has issue with human rights in Iran, then China will be supporting Iran.
The same is with Russia.
The same is with North Korea.
So, why should the western people support Chinese Government when it is always standing on the other side and bringing negative results for the western people?
Just imagine, if the Western countries are standing on the opposite side, would it be possible for China to still support them?
The problems with China didn't started after it became a economic power, but these problems existed much before that.
And the western people also question the logic to have economical ties with China, when it is always standing on the other side.
Stop bluffing. That time has long passed. NATO did nothing when actual help was required. Even the Ukrainians have openly lambasted US/NATO for doing nothing. Your 3 million standing army has only stood and watched the spectacle. That is the bitter truth.
Even now the Polish are saying one thing and the US president something else. You need to admit the reality. Russia isn't Iraq/Afghanistan. You won't attack Russia directly with force because Russia has the ability to strike back and even start a World War.
Even your staunchest allies like India and Israel are taking a cautious approach by limiting their support to US/NATO. They abstain at UN votes and provide lip service. Modi says that time for war is over LMAO India continues to buy cheap Russian oil.
The real problem is that Western powers have problems with almost every developing country. First they colonised, plundered and subjugated developing nations. In today's era, developing nations are economically subjugated.
Bigger nations like China and Russia cannot be bullied into submission. Hence Western chagrin and continued propaganda against both nations.
You want to indulge in small issues.
US supported Ukraine or not, but the final results stay the same that Russia is getting the beating and losing war and economy.
The missile attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are also temporary. Sooner or later, Russia will lose this battle too, while Russian combined with Iran cannot win against NATO supplies.
Israel and India are very much a non-issue here. What they are doing is wrong, but still it is very much a non-issue and will not have effects to change the results of actual war.