F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a difference between conventional war and an (low level) insurgency you muppet.so US that had every tool at its disposal and lost in Iraq and Afghanistan will win against Russia? Is that the logic you believe in? lmaooo...reality will wake up up eventually, i promise you that.
Based on his reasoning, the Soviet Union lost wars against Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and a host of other European Countries which kicked out the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. It also lost WWII with Germany united and the Soviet Union dissolved.There is a difference between conventional war and an (low level) insurgency you muppet.
Last years US losses in afghanistan were a mere 20 to 30 a year.
But US is already sharing money and ammunition from national stocks with Ukraine currently, so its not only "intel" US is sharing in this NATO-initiated war.No, the US will just share intel with the ukrainians.
Many countries can beat US in a war, afterall Afghanistan and Iraq did, but main issue is that these countries dont want to have their entire country destroyed via war crimes just to prove they can beat US. Also, that doesnt even mean Russia can beat US in a war, and i didnt claim that as my point either. lolYou may believe Russia could beat the US in a war.
But US IS already in a war with Russia, just indirectly, so stop with your bulsht semantics- war is war, indirect or direct, its still war, you think Putin is making nuke threats because US "isnt involved in the Ukraine war"? get over it, or stop manipulating- US is fully involved in the Ukraine war, period.So be it. Nothing in my post said anything about the US going to war with Russia.
then how did Afghanistan and Iraq stand a chance and win?But to be honest, Russia wouldnt stand a chance.
I have no idea why youre adressing me with those points. I was pointing out that Russia isnt going to carpet bomb anything in Ukraine, and one of the reasons being the US sharing intel with Ukraine. Take your diversion somewhere else. Im not going have some US/West bashing ping-pong with you or anyone else on this forum. Its pointless and a waste of time.But US is already sharing money and ammunition from national stocks with Ukraine currently, so its not only "intel" US is sharing in this NATO-initiated war.
Many countries can beat US in a war, afterall Afghanistan and Iraq did, but main issue is that these countries dont want to have their entire country destroyed via war crimes just to prove they can beat US. Also, that doesnt even mean Russia can beat US in a war, and i didnt claim that as my point either. lol
But US IS already in a war with Russia, just indirectly, so stop with your bulsht semantics- war is war, indirect or direct, its still war, you think Putin is making nuke threats because US "isnt involved in the Ukraine war"? get over it, or stop manipulating- US is fully involved in the Ukraine war, period.
then how did Afghanistan and Iraq stand a chance and win?