Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Is that thing from WW2?

Cornflower is from 1970s

2B9 Vasilek - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574882851878739981

 

[That Guy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574862579012456450

These might be Saboteurs..lol

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574858181532127261

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574888460078432262

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574872425044516870

Every single oblast in Russia has held a referendum, and have decided to join me (98.9% in favor, 1.1% not able to vote) in the creation of a new nation called "Guyistan", our people will be called "Guys" irrespective of gender, and our national currency has the face of Gordon Freeman on it.

No one cares if Russia held a fake referendum. Unless Russia is willing to use nukes (and they aren't) Russia is clearly going to lose this war.

Russian population itself isn't buying Putin's bullshit, and once Putin loses this war (and he will) he'll likely lose his head.

Putin is the biggest fool Russia has ever seen.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1486818088016355336

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574892761693790210

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574841526303219712

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574322759777361922

 

[Hack-Hook]

The treaty says that reason for leaving needs to be related to nuclear weapons.

no don't say that , it say it must threaten security of the country and the information we shared with IAEA used in assassination of our scientists . that alone is reason enough

AFAIK, Olmert warned Iran that there was a price to pay for violating the treaty but did not go into specifics.

he said if Iran attack us with nukes we answer them back with nuke , Iran never ever threatened Israel with nuke and the threat show they had it .

That is not an acceptable reason for leaving the treaty.

that is far more agreeable reason than N.K. reason to leave , and N.K. reason accepted ,its additional protocol that close the door to leave and we didn't sign it

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574735371996373001

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574806436600766464

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574842671897710592

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574882352135806984

 

[kingQamaR]

It's not about being "Battle Proven" because different battle has a different set of requirements and each side have different approach to the battle.

Just because it worked in one battle (Which I still highly doubt the Iranian drone efficiency in Yemen) it may not work on another battlefield. It's about what they are used on the ground and how this impact that particular war. In THIS war, the Iranian drone is not a efficient battlefield weapon. That's coming from the ground facts in this war.

Don’t you think the Russians would be testing them first before buying !!!

Actually Iranian drones are already being used in Ukrainian I have seen the footage. Russia is not saying much neither is iran but Ukraine military has said their equipment is being destroyed by the Iranian kamikaze drones ?

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574870801253277710

Over 1,100 Russian losses since September 1.

Stop making shit up. If the Russians lost over 1100, why did the West attack Nord Stream 2? It is certainly an act of desperation on the part of Western powers after Russia announced the partial mobilization and those Iranian-built drones were introduced into the conflict. The whole muh HIMARS claims were no longer working, and the Western elites started attacking a civilian pipeline due to panicking.

Now, you can watch these Shahed-136 drones that are wreaking havoc on Western equipment in Ukraine.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574971987986100224

Destroyed Ukrainian equipment

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574322759777361922

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

no don't say that , it say it must threaten security of the country and the information we shared with IAEA used in assassination of our scientists . that alone is reason enough

”Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country.”

By signing the treaty, Iran acknowledges that having nuclear arms is not a supreme interest.
A resigned prime minister that made a comment a decade ago cannot today be an ”extraordinary” event. Even if Olmert threatened to respond to an attack with nukes on Israel with nukes, which is yet to be proven, this is not enough.

Basically you need a threat of a nuclear attack if you do not comply with unreasonable terms.

he said if Iran attack us with nukes we answer them back with nuke , Iran never ever threatened Israel with nuke and the threat show they had it .

Feel free to show a source…

that is far more agreeable reason than N.K. reason to leave , and N.K. reason accepted ,its additional protocol that close the door to leave and we didn't sign it

Ukraine would have a case, Iran does not.

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574785397435023370

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574947720464171008

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574857056040853504

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574781023207948289

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574761608274137090

 

[aviator_fan]

Indian has betrayed Russia as they found a new backer i.e. USA.

India's entire growth is tied to the west. The number of $100BN corporations (IT, Steel), so what practical reason would they have ever backed the supplier of their substandard weapons? Just because Russians sold them a carrier they should back them up when their entire economic growth is hinged on US and Europe.

Its a practical decision

 

[The SC]

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council:

I repeat..we will use nuclear to defend Russia..this is not a hoax

@US_World1

 

[aviator_fan]

@waz @The Eagle

Cheering deaths and mocking soldiers is against forum rules.

Also these points should be made against forum rules:
1. Idiotic baseless posts that says population advantage wins when there is no historical data
2. Making ignorant claims like Russia industrial might is huge in comaprison to the US when its really smaller than South Korea, let alone the rest of Europe. And that was before there 5% decline
3. Uninformed arguments about how a Russian or a Chinese system is better than HIMARS. Well if Chinese is better, give it to the Russians. And Russians have one, what wedding night celebration are they saving their precision artillery for
4. Claiming to speak for an entire population of 1BN+ Chinese that 'Chinese will do this and do that', when the only knowledge you have of China are the Made in China socks that you have on.
And I could go on for detracting from the knowledgable debate going on here on both sides by your repeat cut and pastes that make you sound dumber than a Russian bot on Twitter.

It won't bud. Russia will be fine. Ukraine is being destroyed as a country. Large Ukrainian areas are about to be officially annexed and announced as Russian territory.

Russia is fine yes, when it has resorted to retarded criminals to do the fighting and anybody that can afford it has left as part of the 250K male population.

That and over the next 5 years its infrastructure will be like the 60s Soviet Union working with paper/ink/typer writers. . Only train transportation. Oil pumping will stop as Siemens and Shlumberger equipment will not be available. I think it will be a big tourist destination in 5 years if you wanted to visit a bigger version of Cuba, a land that has stood still in time.

 

[aviator_fan]

Iran produces faster than America. Iran absolutely hates America since 1979 revolution. Iran supply thousands of drones to Russia to blow up Ukrainian tanks. In addition, Russia builds thousands more a year with TOT.

Average (not Shah and his rich subjects) have hated Iran way before 79: 79 was when they proved it.