ahtan_china
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2015
- Messages
- 277
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
You are stupid if you believe this newsOh boy things are going to get spicy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are stupid if you believe this newsOh boy things are going to get spicy
I do understand why Zelenskyy reinforce Bakhmut, because for him, it's the same, if he withdraw now, the rest of the Russian Force would move on to the next town and that town would become another Bakhmut, so for him, it is better to draw as much blood as possible and then blunt their offensive as much as possible so when it's time to withdraw (I don't think he will leave those troop behind. It would have been a last minute withdraw when T-0504 is threatened) He want to make sure even if they lose Bakhmut, they would have been degrading the Russian enough they aren't going anywhere.I agree with this.
Bakhmut was a nice defensive point where russia, desperate for a propaganda win, threw material and men at.
However, with their artillery more and more in place, and the city now almost encircled with supply lines under fire…throwing more defenders in is just not the most efficient way to go.
Pull back while constantly countering and counter arti. Then lure them in your fortified defensive point around sloviansk/kramatorsk. Ukraine has plenty of space to trade.
Maybe Slavic mentality? They made the same mistake with severodonetsk.
Unless they believe they can stop the russians short of them taking bakhmut. Which might be worth it denying them the propaganda win.
Again, I see that in Russia, but China? For what? China is not going to get Ukraine unless they also sent troop to invade. I mean, I can totally see China doing Taiwan over it, but Ukraine is zero sum gain (in fact someone would say it's negative for China) I mean, all those sticking their neck out for something they didn't start nor would not gain anything from.That would've been more rational for China to prop up Russia before it lost half its military, but it doesn't mean the demand for an economic self-harm move diminished with a worsening cost-benefit ratio. Maybe, it's even going up because of more ruinous results, and thus more utility, and potency as an "I'm the Boss" message.
It's like how Japanese lords were often ordering their best general, or a retainer to harakiri, or just outright kill them without any justification during the time of crisis, and had it done in the most public, and dramatic way possible.
Chinese military publications analyzing Russian failures before, and after the war can be quite frank, and rational, while, institutionally, PLA has, for example, kept copying these exact failings despite there being a recognition on the level of thoughtleaders.
Just like in Russia, PLA can have tons of competent, Western style military think tanks, and at the same time not giving a s##t about a single thing they write about.
Russia had a small Westernised part of officer corps, who studied Western tactics, and went to watch many NATO wargames, yet I haven't seen a single que on this expertise being acted upon.
You don’t understand. Ukraine strategy is killing as many Russian zombies as possible while holding on as long as possible. Because Russia casualties are multiple higher than Ukraine, so the strategy makes sense.Bakhmut losses for ukriane will only make sense if ukriane is getting something big i.e F16s and bidding some time.
Otherwises it's a tactical mistake as his generals are pointing out
says who? Ukraine?You don’t understand. Ukraine strategy is killing as many Russian zombies as possible while holding on as long as possible. Because Russia casualties are multiple higher than Ukraine, so the strategy makes sense.
Once Bakhmut falls, Ukraine defenders can fall back to the prepared position 30-40 km behind Bakhmut. and the same procedure repeats. Bakhmut will be everywhere.
says who? Ukraine?
anyway we will know in next few months. Whether Ukraine will loose cities one by one or whether Russia will take them one by one
one thing is for sure, regardless of what happens Ukraine infrastructure is doomed, there is nothing left to bomb all of this due to one stupid decision of trying to bomb Crimea bridge
Say Zelinskki and general Oleksandr Syrsykyj (left), the supreme commander of all Ukraine land forces. They made the decision to hold on Bakhmut.says who? Ukraine?
anyway we will know in next few months. Whether Ukraine will loose cities one by one or whether Russia will take them one by one
one thing is for sure, regardless of what happens Ukraine infrastructure is doomed, there is nothing left to bomb all of this due to one stupid decision of trying to bomb Crimea bridge
And you trust them ?Say Zelinskki and general Oleksandr Syrsykyj (left), the supreme commander of all Ukraine land forces. They made the decision to hold on Bakhmut.
View attachment 920042
Yes. Russia army is doomed.And you trust them ?
We saw this drama play out in azeri-armenian conflict too
It's indeed doomed but never the less it will achieve it's objectives and no one in west is daring to provide anything offensive to ukrianeYes. Russia army is doomed.
Russia has failed to achieve any of its major objectives 1 year into the war. What makes you so sure they'll achieve them now, when the Ukranians are far more prepared.It's indeed doomed but never the less it will achieve it's objectives and no one in west is daring to provide anything offensive to ukriane
when you look at the map of current front line it tells you a different storyRussia has failed to achieve any of its major objectives 1 year into the war. What makes you so sure they'll achieve them now, when the Ukranians are far more prepared.
Also, the west is providing almost everything the Ukranians want, and Ukrainian pilots are finally getting training on western jets. The Ukraikians have received offensive weapons, it's just taking time due to training soldiers to use them.