F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Complete bullshit ofcourse.
Armata is only good for crappy propaganda at parades. The handfull they have is nowhere near ready for combat.
Abrams export version has been sold to several countries. Some of them in conflicts or risk of conflict.
Abrams: The export version is used by the armies of Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Poland and Iraq
I am capable of reading the treaties.Who are you to tel what is leggal or illegal?
Yeah, it exists, only for weak amd dependant countries. Go punish India for example for breaking the sanctions tradimg with russia.
I am just wondering how much hypocrisy you can swalow before you admit evident fact.
The only country which is responsible for delivering Mirages and Exocets are France. It is not the responsibilitity of ”Europeans”.F1s and the Exocets were enough to cause mayhem in the Persian Gulf shipping lanes, even leading to the accidental destruction of USS Stark from a misfired Exocet. You can't fly F-1s for 8 years into the war and keep firing exocets (Stark was in 1988) without fresh missiles and continued aircraft parts.
So the higher moral ground of not supporting a combatant against Iran does not fly.
Your logic is absurd, as the russians could not buy or produce weapons themself with money provided by trade....I am capable of reading the treaties.
You are welcome to show that I am mistaken - with sources.
You should not use words like hypocricy, which You do not understand.
Sanctions are voluntary. India is not required to apply sanctions.
Shipping weapons to an belligerent is not a crime.
It is however something that is noncompliant with neutrality.
The other side then have a right to treat the weapons dealer as a belligerent and apply sanctions or go to war.
Trade is not comparable to weapons shipment, so there is no hypocricy.
It is not a question of logic.Your logic is absurd, as the russians could not buy or produce weapons themself with money provided by trade....
You realise that with the speed of advance of your beloved russians…that this conflict will drag on for more then a year?But...but...US itself said that there will be no Abrams in Ukraine at line of contact, not in the next month, not in a half year, even not this year...
View attachment 915951