Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[vi-va]

While i understand this point about Scott Ritter, can you tell me how him being a rapist is related to the information he provides about the Ukraine war?

pls dont be that kind of emotional person who cant analyze what someone says and judge the point off its own merit- if you know his points are BS, then counter them, calling him a rapist doesnt change the validity of his points, because you are using a fallacy- ad hominem, a personal attack, to counter his point(s).


But America threw over $1TRN dollars at the Afghanistan and Iraq wars EACH, and lost both, so wtf do you really mean by "money talks"? is it even money or fake cash debt?

U.S. did lose both war. The objectives of the war were not achieved. U.S. wasted their resource in Afghanistan and Iraq.

But U.S. didn't lose the batter, actually U.S. eliminated Saddam ground force in weeks, and drove Taliban out of Kabul within days. U.S. definitely had superior technology and well-trained army in these 2 damn wars. U.S. fought very well in tactic perspective,

On the other hand, Russia lack of preparation. No plan at all. Otherwise, Russia won't lose 300 billions foreign exchange reserve in the first week of the war. Russia central bank was shocked by the war, they are out of the decision-making group.

From tactic point of view, Russia is fighting a WW1/WW2 with pre-cold war weaponaries, entrenchment, tanks, artilleries.

I feel sad for Russians, incompetent leadership, corruption. Putin wasted 22 years defending his thrones, but he doesn't know anything on how to run this country.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

How is it libel if you say someone is a CIA asset, nobody would think badly of someone of they were a CIA asset. It is a source of pride I am sure. And its not a criminal offence where I am. And I have no money they would ever get to, so that can just sue, me. And thirdly, it is just my opinion and opinions are protected. And fourthly they would have to prove they were not a CIA asset. So, Id like to subpoena their phone and travel history and all their bank accounts. Yeah, Im sure they would not want that. Also Assange is right now innocent of all the things he is accused of in Sweden.


He's a hero. He uncovered massive war crimes and published them, Very brave guy.

Of course it is libel.
In court, you have to provide evidence that they are, and you will not be able to subpoena their information. Swedish operators does not have to provide the government with such information.
If you do not have any proof now, you are bound to lose a case.
Furthermore, According to Swedish Law, it does not matter if it is the truth or not. What matters is if you make a statement to hurt them or not.
You are clearly making the statement to make them less credible, so you are in my opinion guilty of libel according to Swedish Law.

Produce proof, or STFU.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606915587162218497

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606916248557830144

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606736964857864192

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606681791045046273

 

[Beny Karachun]

and planning to detonate a nuclear dirty conventional bomb and blame it on Russia

Lol retard

who “said on record that he wants to turn Ukraine into a big Israel.”

Of course he would, if Israel was instead of Ukraine we would have held Moscow by now, looking at how pathetic the Russian forces are. They can't fight for shit, down to old T-62s, can't gain air supremacy over a country with barely any airforce remaining.

Russia had luck the Ukrainians didn't have the Spike NLOS at the start of the war because that 40km long line of tanks and vehicles back in March/February would have all been destroyed if they had it.

 

[Vergennes]

So are your words and the words of other Western propagandists

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606699026329616384

And the reality ;

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606982873445457921

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606984752728313857

 

[MeFishToo]

but Ukraine's plans to join NATO (while "suppressing" DPR and LPR into compliance) wasnt a threat to Russia's security? just a question like you asked..

DPR and LPR is a russian creation. We all know it, including you.
But sure, Ukraine mightve wanted to join NATO. Who can blame them? Its not like Russia wasnt a huge security threat to them.
NATO is not a security threat to Russia but a threat to its emperial ambitions - notice how Russia isnt trying to annex NATO territory “Heim ins Reich”?

 

[Viet]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1606984752728313857

Those are russian recruits, fresh mobi, ex prison inmates, rapists, hooligans, minority groups, etc. even they die in hundreds of thousands Putin cares little. In Bakhmut the Wagners want to save their own lives, they send those worthless poor souls to run against Ukraine artillery instead.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Those are russian recruits, fresh mobi, ex prison inmates, rapists, hooligans, minority groups, etc. even they die in hundreds of thousands Putin cares little. In Bakhmut the Wagners want to save their own lives, they send those worthless poor souls to run against Ukraine artillery instead.

A good question will be who is standing against Russian artillery in that front, and how much zelensky care about them.

 

[Viet]

A good question will be who is standing against Russian artillery in that front, and how much zelensky care about them.

no comparison. Ukraine soldiers are obliged to do their duties otherwise they will stand before military court or worse. Zelinskki is the elected president and as such he has the absolute authority to command the army. I am surprised to tell you the most natural thing.

Putin in contrast is a thief. He just want to steal. Nothing else.

 

[Broccoli]

I've noticed that Russians aren't even using that many tanks in Bakhmut and sends soldiers into battle almost like we were living in year 1915 instead of 2022.

Crazy stuff.

 

[vi-va]

I've noticed that Russians aren't even using that many tanks in Bakhmut and sends soldiers into battle almost like we were living in year 1915 instead of 2022.

Crazy stuff.

Not many tanks left, that's fact. Sad.

 

[thetutle]

Of course it is libel.
In court, you have to provide evidence that they are, and you will not be able to subpoena their information. Swedish operators does not have to provide the government with such information.
If you do not have any proof now, you are bound to lose a case.
Furthermore, According to Swedish Law, it does not matter if it is the truth or not. What matters is if you make a statement to hurt them or not.
You are clearly making the statement to make them less credible, so you are in my opinion guilty of libel according to Swedish Law.

Produce proof, or STFU.

Lol, In common law countries, Australia in particular, truth is a defence, and the statement has to be a statement of fact and not opinion and it has to be of a type that makes people think less of them. Being a CIA asset is something to be proud of.

Of course their information can be subpoenaed, how else can you run a court case and prove your statement if you dont have access to their records and bank accounts and phone and computer. The information doesnt go to the government, the government already has all this information, the information will go to me to help me prove my case.

And then they have to show harm resulting from my statement. How many people in Sweden will read what I say in this forum and think less of them? You clearly dont think less of them.

Swedish law is such a joke, I laugh at Swedish law.To be sued I have to served with the court documents, and it has to be personal service. When people approach me on the street and ask me if I am this person, I just ignore them and keep walking, You cant get to my front door unless you are vetted. And even if these CIA assets sue me, and they actually serve me with court documents and win, they will get no money. Because I have no money, or at least not in a jurisdiction that they will ever find. Unless they are CIA assets. And even then, after they have spent a million $ suing me, they will get nothing as I would have spent my money to make sure they never get it. hehehehehe. And after that I will appeal once and twice. And they will spend more money and get zilch. than they will have to work harder as CIA assets to pay their legal fees. And if they are not CIA assets they will have to become one.

According to Swedish Law, it does not matter if it is the truth or not. What matters is if you make a statement to hurt them or not.

Do you actually believe Sweden has a law banning the saying of truth? "You are guilty of telling the truth". lol, how clueless are you?

You tell a short person, "hey you are 150 cm short" and then you get sued? lol, Sweden must be full of comedians and gullible people.

 

[Ali_Baba]

Whatever happened to Putin’s vaunted “wonder weapons?”

Russia Is Struggling in Ukraine. So Where Are Its So-Called Wonder Weapons?

Missiles, fighter jets, robots, and even a mecha turned out to be vaporware.

www.popularmechanics.com

>> Indeed .. as many here on this forum have said - it is all over priced junk powered by scavenged washing machine parts..

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Lol, In common law countries, Australia in particular, truth is a defence, and the statement has to be a statement of fact and not opinion and it has to be of a type that makes people think less of them. Being a CIA asset is something to be proud of.

Of course their information can be subpoenaed, how else can you run a court case and prove your statement if you dont have access to their records and bank accounts and phone and computer. The information doesnt go to the government, the government already has all this information, the information will go to me to help me prove my case.

And then they have to show harm resulting from my statement. How many people in Sweden will read what I say in this forum and think less of them? You clearly dont think less of them.

Swedish law is such a joke, I laugh at Swedish law.To be sued I have to served with the court documents, and it has to be personal service. When people approach me on the street and ask me if I am this person, I just ignore them and keep walking, You cant get to my front door unless you are vetted. And even if these CIA assets sue me, and they actually serve me with court documents and win, they will get no money. Because I have no money, or at least not in a jurisdiction that they will ever find. Unless they are CIA assets. And even then, after they have spent a million $ suing me, they will get nothing as I would have spent my money to make sure they never get it. hehehehehe. And after that I will appeal once and twice. And they will spend more money and get zilch. than they will have to work harder as CIA assets to pay their legal fees. And if they are not CIA assets they will have to become one.

You might be untouchable, but you would still be a criminal according to my interpretation of Swedish Law.

Do you actually believe Sweden has a law banning the saying of truth? "You are guilty of telling the truth". lol, how clueless are you?

You tell a short person, "hey you are 150 cm short" and then you get sued? lol, Sweden must be full of comedians and gullible people.

There is no law against telling the truth.
There is a law against trying to destroy the reputation of someone.
Then it does not matter if it is the truth.

Cissi Wallin fälls för grovt förtal - Nyheter (Ekot)

Medieprofilen Cissi Wallin fälls för grovt förtal av journalisten Fredrik Virtanen, meddelar Stockholms tingsrätt.

sverigesradio.se

What is defamation?
Defamation means pointing out someone as a criminal, reprehensible in their way of life or in some other way providing information that is apt to subject them to the disrespect of others. It doesn't really matter if the information is true or not. Emphasis is added if the task is likely to expose others to disrespect.

I added a thread to avoid cluttering this anymore.

What are some unusual aspects of Swedish Law?

Swedish Law has some unusual aspects. To avoid cluttering other threads, I added this. What is rape? Rape is one of the most serious sexual crimes Anyone who carries out sexual intercourse or another comparable sexual act with a person who does not participate voluntarily is convicted of...

defence.pk