What's new

Russia pushing India to buy BMP-3 vehicles and shelving homemade FICV proje

sudhir007

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
4,728
Reaction score
1
Russia pushing India to buy BMP-3 vehicles and shelving homemade FICV project | idrw.org

Russia has been aggressively pushing India to buy its infantry combat vehicles BMP-3 and shelve its own analogous project that has got stalled, The FICV project was approved four years ago and has seen practically no progress since that. It envisages the production of 2,600 vehicles to replace the older BMP-2 combat vehicles. The project costs about ten billion dollars, while the government will fund 80 percent of development costs.

The MoD is pursuing this project under the “Make” procedure of the Defence Procurement Procedure of 2008 (DPP-2008), under which Indian vendors develop major defence platforms. The MoD funds 80% of the cost of developing a prototype that must be at least 30% indigenous; the Indian DAs pays the remaining 20%.

Russia has offered to transfer BMP-3 combat vehicle technology to India if India cancels its project, an Indian Defense Ministry source said. This has more sense for India, as its homemade Futuristic Infantry Combat Vehicle (FICV) can be commissioned no earlier than in ten years’ time.

Source close to idrw.org have told us that Army is not entirely satisfied with BMP-3 , when it was tested in India it had failed is some key areas, another Source pointed out that BMP-3 is still based on a Three decade old design and will not cover new threats a infantry combat vehicle will have to face in near future .
 
.
This is just a light armored truck. How hard can it be? Why does it take 10 years to build it?

Russians are right in pushing BMP3 since Indians are incapable of building one.
 
.
This is just a light armored truck. How hard can it be? Why does it take 10 years to build it?

Russians are right in pushing BMP3 since Indians are incapable of building one.

where it says 10 years? IA already rejected russian BMP-3, see what is written before writing.
 
. .
This is just a light armored truck. How hard can it be? Why does it take 10 years to build it?

Russians are right in pushing BMP3 since Indians are incapable of building one.

Don't parade your ignorance like this. BMP is an infantry combat vehicle, not an armored personal carrier (which might fit the description of "light armoured truck", that too only by suspending disbelief).

If you want to know what the Indian army wants from the FICV, read the description. And read what the BMP-2 can already do.

Other than carrying troops into the battlefield, it should have the latest explosive reactive armor, it should fire sophisticated anti tank missiles, fire anti aircraft guns and missiles, be fully amphibious (swim in water), and be operable by a three man crew. It should be able to stand and fight with a medium sized (25-35 tonne) main battle tank. It should also be fully NBC capable, that is, it should provide full protection against even a nuclear explosion, or chemical or biological agents. It should be fully networked, that is, be able to transmit and receive data from all other vehicles in the battlefield, and even UAVs, so that the commander has a complete picture of the battlefield at all times.

Some "truck", wouldn't you say?:cheers:

And before somebody claims that it is unobtanium, let me point out that many modern ICVs already incorporate many of these, and even our old BMP-2s have most of the properties listed above. I have only listed the requirements that came to my mind off the top of my head. If you really are interested, go read about the rest of them, and open your mouth and eyes wide in shock.

Someone who doesn't know the difference between an ICV and an APC should probably not open his mouth on a defence forum, wouldn't you agree?;)


Armored truck:
iag_armored_personnel_carrier_ied_proection_2-large.jpg


BMP:
Bmp%203ifv.jpg


bmp2kazakhyh4.jpg
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom