CONNAN
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2009
- Messages
- 3,381
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
This actually reminds me of something interesting: in the early 90s Russia floated the idea of actually joining NATO.
Can you imagine the historical repercussion that would have been felt had that happened?
As far as buddy-buddy relations go, Japan and the US seem to be holding fine despite a lack of NATO partnership. Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia too. In fact, they're increasing their cooperation with the region.
Yes because USA need to keep china in check I just want to point out You cannot expect everything every time even from your allies . sorry if I put that in a wrong way . India want respect and state of the art equipment for it armed forces but the problem is they want the Rome to be built in one day and some section of the Armed forces are like kids in the candy store . . that's the reason for the shopping spree of arms and other deals . these type of deals will only give you leverage temporarily even if we take economy into consideration . For example we can maintain peace with china but we cannot make it vacate Akasi chin nor Tibet