Russia intends to deploy strategic bombers and nuclear weapon.

[Aepsilons]

youre living in America stop with your grammar nazism

Lol, oh Senny...

 

[Superboy]

Deploy Tu-160s to Sevastopol and scare Ukrainian people from the south

 

[flamer84]

lol where are we bordering russia?

Through the German province of Poland.

 

[pher]

good going, russia!!! no need to care about the opinion of those American pawns.

 

[Beidou2020]

Hopefully Russia stations its nuclear missiles and strategic bombers in Latin America.

Lets see if the US has the balls to fight Russia.

Russian president should pull out of all the military restriction agreements with the US and deploy strategic bombers and nuclear missiles in Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia. Build up multilayered air defences in these countries.

Russia should sell Iran S-300 air defences and sell missile technology. If the US puts further sanctions on Russia, then transfer a few hundred nuclear warheads to Iran. Fully arm Argentina with nuclear weapons too.

Russia needs to be more aggressive against the American terrorists.

Aggression must be met with aggression.

Putin has been far too soft and timid in responding to the American fascists.

 

[Declein]

Russian president should pull out of all the military restriction agreements with the US and deploy strategic bombers and nuclear missiles in Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia. Build up multilayered air defences in these countries .

But why would Cuba, Ecuador, etc...agree with stationing Russian nuclear weapons on their soil? Or let me put it another way, China has more chances of hosting Russian nuclear weapons that those countries

Russia should sell Iran S-300 air defences and sell missile technology. If the US puts further sanctions on Russia, then transfer a few hundred nuclear warheads to Iran. Fully arm Argentina with nuclear weapons too..

And risk Iran using those same weapons against them? Logic 1 on1 : don't sell weapons to a country that might use them against you. A strong Iran is against Russia's interests.

Russia needs to be more aggressive against the American terrorists..

When you have a GDP the size of Italy and virtually no allies, it's very hard to be "more aggressive"..

 

[Beidou2020]

But why would Cuba, Ecuador, etc...agree with stationing Russian nuclear weapons on their soil? Or let me put it another way, China has more chances of hosting Russian nuclear weapons that those countries



And risk Iran using those same weapons against them? Logic 1 on1 : don't sell weapons to a country that might use them against you. A strong Iran is against Russia's interests.



When you have a GDP the size of Italy and virtually no allies, it's very hard to be "more aggressive"..

Latin American countries despise the US and will gladly host any Russian strategic weapons. In fact Russia reopened its radar base in Cuba during Putin's last visit. There are many anti-American countries in Latin America that will gladly welcome a Russian presence to counter the American terrorists.

Iran and Russia are strategic partners against the American fascists. They are already getting closer.

You don't need GDP size when you have the weaponry and military firepower the Russians have. Russia can supply weapons to everyone the US hates and fights with. Russia can cause America problems all over the world by interfering in everything the US is doing and doing exactly what the US hates. Russia can support other countries by supplying weapons and forming air defences and strategic bases.

Russia made a mistake in not supplying Iran with strategic weapons and air defences.

Latin American countries should be made nuclear powers.

 

[Declein]

OK..let me clear this: except Cuba, and maybe Venezuela, which S American countries "despise" USA? And which would jeopardize their existence for a shaky alliance with Russia?
Countries don't act like 3 year old kids to risk everything just to spite the Americans...interests are always first.

Secondly, to give all those weapons, you need money, which Russia doesn't have. USSR had immense trouble propping their allied countries military..
And then there's the issue of USA responding in kind and arming any counties hostile to Russia...and there's a looooottt of countries hostile towards Russia..

On Iran, you can ask the Iranians here about their Russian brothers...

 

[Beidou2020]

OK..let me clear this: except Cuba, and maybe Venezuela, which S American countries "despise" USA? And which would jeopardize their existence for a shaky alliance with Russia?
Countries don't act like 3 year old kids to risk everything just to spite the Americans...interests are always first.

Secondly, to give all those weapons, you need money, which Russia doesn't have. USSR had immense trouble propping their allied countries military..
And then there's the issue of USA responding in kind and arming any counties hostile to Russia...and there's a looooottt of countries hostile towards Russia..

On Iran, you can ask the Iranians here about their Russian brothers...

Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina, just to name a few.

Pretty much every Latin American country despise the US interference and want a check to American fascism. It is in their interest to get close with Russia to counter the American bully. Russia can be major disruptive figure in America's own back yard.

Russia has been exporting weapons for decades and can build military bases in strategic points to counter the common enemy. Russia has experience in this and more than enough money to jointly operate these bases.

Russian enemies are already fully armed so Russia has nothing to lose. Which is why Russia must be more aggressive against the American regime. The regime wants Russia to stay passive, but Russia has many methods to counter the regime if it had the tough leaders.

Iranian government and Russian government are pretty much strategic partners due to the sanctions. Iran wants Russian strategic weapons.
Russia’s Ace in the Hole: a Super-Missile It Can Sell to Iran


Russia Seeks Several Military Bases Abroad – Defense Minister | Military & Intelligence | RIA Novosti

Russia is planning to expand its permanent military presence outside its borders by placing military bases in a number of foreign countries, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said Wednesday.

Shoigu said the list includes Vietnam, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, the Seychelles, Singapore and several other countries.

“The talks are under way, and we are close to signing the relevant documents,” Shoigu told reporters in Moscow.

The minister added that the negotiations cover not only military bases but also visits to ports in such countries on favorable conditions as well as the opening of refueling sites for Russian strategic bombers on patrol.

Moscow currently has only one naval base outside the former Soviet Union – in Tartus, Syria, but the fate of this naval facility is uncertain because of the ongoing civil war in that country.

Post-Soviet Russia closed a large naval base in Vietnam and a radar base in Cuba in 2002 due to financial constraints.

However, Russia has started reviving its navy and strategic aviation since mid-2000s, seeing them as a tool to project the Russian image abroad and to protect its national interests around the globe.

Now, Moscow needs to place such military assets in strategically important regions of the world to make them work effectively toward the goal of expanding Russia’s global influence.

PressTV - Russian ships, bombers in Latin America worry US officials

 

[Declein]

Russia's opponents don't have nuclear weapons. That can be changed.

And on South America, I can clearly see it now, thanks. Countries like Argentina will be thrilled to throw their economy in the garbage and face sanctions just to house Russian nuclear weapons, with the goal of ending up in a nuclear war. I'm sure they're jumping up and down at the prospect of dying for Russia..because....something....

A better question is why doesn't China take hostile actions against the USA "fascists"? Surely, you;re more powerful than those Latin American countries, and it's your duty to stop the fascists, with the support of Russia, ofc..

 

[Beidou2020]

Russia's opponents don't have nuclear weapons. That can be changed.

And on South America, I can clearly see it now, thanks. Countries like Argentina will be thrilled to throw their economy in the garbage and face sanctions just to house Russian nuclear weapons, with the goal of ending up in a nuclear war. I'm sure they're jumping up and down at the prospect of dying for Russia..because....something....

A better question is why doesn't China take hostile actions against the USA "fascists"? Surely, you;re more powerful than those Latin American countries, and it's your duty to stop the fascists, with the support of Russia, ofc..

Russia can play the same game by arming as many countries as it wants with nuclear weapons

The more countries US sanctions, the more they move towards Russia and the bigger the problem it becomes for the tyrants in Washington.

American power is grossly overstated. It's entire economy is hanging on by a thread with 0% interest rates and massive money printing where it needs other countries to absorb its inflation. Without others using dollars, the US economy collapses.

Sanctions only accelerate the formation of a vast anti-American group which makes problems worse for the US which prefers a passive world so it doesn't have problems everywhere in the world.

China is already countering the US by growing fast and ending the monopoly positions of the US which makes American sanctions very ineffective. Russia's pivot to China is proof of this.

The more trouble you give the US in Latin America, the more areas the US will have to manage. The regime will eventually lose control as its economy is already build on a massive ponzi scheme and 3 gigantic bubbles.

 

[Schutz]

Ohh that Chechen thing is so cringeworthy, almost like north Korea where they are forced to celebrate. I dont care how great of a leader our country had, I would NEVER idolise one individual man, its wrong and its why celebrity culture is disgusting, why anyone would idolise a politician is beyond me and either goes to show government control or a really fucking stupid populous.