What's new

Russia gains edge in space race as US shuttle bows out

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
Russia gains edge in space race as US shuttle bows out

As the United States winds down its shuttle programme in a symbolic twist in a long-running space rivalry, Russia will gain complete control of access to the International Space Station.

The Russian space agency plays down any triumphalism, but US astronauts will remain dependent on Russia for access to the ISS at least until 2015 and will have to pay for seats in its Soyuz space capsules.

"We cannot say that we have won the space race, but simply that we have reached the end of a certain stage," the deputy head of the Russian space agency, Vitaly Davydov, said in an interview.

On July 8, four US astronauts will board the Atlantis shuttle for its last flight, wrapping up a three-decade-long programme in which the United States took turns to ferry supplies and crews to the ISS with Russia's Proton and Soyuz rockets.

Henceforth, Washington will have to pay $51 million per seat in Russia's space capsules until a new crew vehicle can be built by private companies, which US space agency NASA has estimated could be between 2015 and 2020.

Davydov of the space agency Roskosmos rejected any talk of rivalry, however, emphasizing that the ISS was primarily a story of successful international cooperation.

"I cannot think today of another international space project that is so effective in its scale, its significance and its results as the ISS," he said.

While Russia gains a symbolic victory, it will be a costly one, with the obligation to build more space ships to go back and forth to the ISS eating up a budget that could be spent on other projects.

Unlike the reusable NASA shuttles, the Russian Soyuz space capsules are single-use, except for the section in which spacemen return to Earth.

The situation is "not very convenient because it lays a heavy burden on Roskosmos's production capacities," space industry expert Igor Marinin told AFP.

Roskosmos this year declared its budget as $3 billion, a fraction of NASA's massive $18.5 billion budget.

And it has faced embarrassing setbacks, including the failure of several satellite launches that led to the sacking of the long-serving space chief Anatoly Perminov in April.

The country's space industry has also drawn smirks with a clunky experiment simulating a trip to Mars, in which volunteers are spending more than a year confined at a Moscow research institute and "landed" in a specially designed sand pit.

To recoup its costs, Roskosmos hopes to build a stronger presence in the commercial space market, such as satellite launches, its newly appointed chief Vladimir Popovkin said at the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum last month.

"The goal is to take up a suitable position in the commercial market: about 10 to 12 percent" of a market worth $300 billion per year, Popovkin said.

"This is one of the few things in our country that is competitive on the international level."

While Russia holds 40 percent of the world's space launches and constructs 20 percent of its space craft, currently "its share in the space business is unfairly small, not more than three percent," Popovkin said

Russia also faces new rivals, notably China, which in 2003 became the third country in the world after the Soviet Union and the United States to send a man into space in its own ship.

In ambitious plans, China hopes to put a robot on the Moon in 2013 and to build its own space station due to enter service in 2015.

Davydov acknowledged that China had become a rival, albeit still far behind, but said Russia did not feel threatened.

"There is a place for everyone in space," he said.

"In a certain sense, (China) is our competitor... but that is absolutely normal and we have not been afraid of the market for a long time now."

Ironically, the new commercial realities of the Russian space programme, with reduced budgets and the need to cooperate on large-scale projects, make some Soviet space veterans yearn for the competitive edge of the Cold War.

"It's strange that during the Cold War, when we cosmonauts and constructors dreamt of cooperation, there were a lot of new launches, but then cooperation came and now we are mostly repeating ourselves," lamented retired cosmonaut Georgy Grechko, 80.

The US space shuttle programme's goal of making launches less expensive was not ultimately reached, he said, and its end sees a return to single-use "sausage-like" rockets little different to those used 50 years ago.

"Mankind has lost its stimulus to go into space using more complicated machines," he complained.

Russia gains edge in space race as US shuttle bows out - LANKA BUSINESS ONLINE
 
.
Russia will fully exploit this opportunity if funds allow.
 
.
I think Russia and US will collaborate, to minimize cost involved in exploring outer space. Russian rockets and American space station.
 
.
space shuttle was such a great work of science......its sad they are grounding it.
 
.
space shuttle was such a great work of science......its sad they are grounding it.

The step had to be taken, it's the government's fault that we didn't have a backup ready when the time came. The shuttle is too expensive and also limited to LEO. Commercial space is a step back, but its a step back in preparation to take two steps forward if things succeed. If things don't, then we are out a manned space program because I have absolutely no confidence in the government actually completing the SLS (senate launch system:lol:).

Also to those who say Russia will use this as an opportunity for something, there is none. Russia was already launching as much as it could for the ISS, this will add additional strain. At least in space there is no competition now beyond perceptions. The only destination for the near future is the ISS, and that is international.
 
.
The space race was over a long time ago. What we are seing now as far as the U.S. space program is the evolution from Governmental to Private.
 
.
Given that the US is dependant already on russian rockets for delivering 20 ton loads to LEO (strategic importance), and that the ISS can be considered under Russian control, the edge is hardly a surprise.
 
.
...the ISS can be considered under Russian control, the edge is hardly a surprise.

explain how the ISS can be considered under Russian control when the US pays billions to maintain and keep it in orbit?

Outside of a bizarre neo-cold war world view there is no possibility that the ISS could be considered Russia's. It is an international effort, period.
 
.
explain how the ISS can be considered under Russian control when the US pays billions to maintain and keep it in orbit?

Outside of a bizarre neo-cold war world view there is no possibility that the ISS could be considered Russia's. It is an international effort, period.

The ISS is an international effort in the sense that it is a project funded by many nations, but by no means from the technological point of view. The core of the ISS, the base and the support of the whole station, is all Russian technology, and part of the Russian controled module, so it is correct to say that there is a dependance on Russia, even that it is controlled by them. The rest are just "add ons" dependant on it.

Of course, it´s not like "the Russians" are gonna disconnect it, but we are not discussing that.
 
.
We wish the whole world would cooperate in the space area and not be a rival just for the sense of national pride. The Earth's resources are drying up and people keep multiplying if this continue down this road humanity will face a great danger 200 years from now.

Finding another place to live would solve alot of the world's problems but thats just wishful thinking. because knowing humanity it will fight on who should own the new planet.
 
.
I think Russia and US will collaborate, to minimize cost involved in exploring outer space. Russian rockets and American space station.

Russians have more experience in Space Stations too than the Americans... Forgoten the Mir :coffee:
 
.
The ISS is an international effort in the sense that it is a project funded by many nations, but by no means from the technological point of view. The core of the ISS, the base and the support of the whole station, is all Russian technology, and part of the Russian controled module, so it is correct to say that there is a dependance on Russia, even that it is controlled by them. The rest are just "add ons" dependant on it.

Of course, it´s not like "the Russians" are gonna disconnect it, but we are not discussing that.

Except the support of the station is not exclusively Russian. Both the Destiny and Tranquility modules also have critical roles in life support for the ISS. The main source of energy for the ISS are US-made solar arrays. These are hardly "add ons".

The basic gist is the station couldn't survive without US parts just as much as it couldnt survive without Russian parts.

All this is beside the point, because without funding the station goes down. So funding is just as much a factor in control (in fact more so) than the actual modules, otherwise the word 'control' loses its meaning.
 
.
Russians have more experience in Space Stations too than the Americans... Forgoten the Mir :coffee:

forgot Skylab, and the ISS counts as a space station, so I'd presume Space Station experience is equal.
 
.
forgot Skylab, and the ISS counts as a space station, so I'd presume Space Station experience is equal.

Mir was in orbit longer and was manned longer (which included American astronauts)

Skylab
Days in orbit 2,249 days
Days occupied 171 days

Mir
Days in orbit 5,519 days
Days occupied 4,592 days
 
.
forgot Skylab, and the ISS counts as a space station, so I'd presume Space Station experience is equal.

The account is not equal. If the Americans would not fund the International Space Station (United States would have to pay Russia for the dismantling of U.S. units). Otherwise, they might "accidentally" drop them to the American heads (like in Texas or Colorado). Russia is able to send an additional module space station modules and remove the U.S. (if the U.S. wished to withdraw from the project). The main thing that the U.S. had not forgotten its pilots in orbit. Not everything is decided by money. Sometimes you need an exclusive technology and application experience.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom