Barrel-Bomba
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2015
- Messages
- 401
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly my friend, there is no point in going down that rabbit hole right now- fighter unit cost is notoriously long winded and complex but in the FGFA's case it would be FAR more given the nature of the deal (JVs, shared development costs, joint production etc). Right now there is no solid agreement, we can't know how much this deal will actually cost nor do we know the exact number of fighters to be procured.
Really? What kind of deals with the UK amount to such a figure? The Hawk deal is only around $1BN and there don't seem to be any others on the table between India and the UK.Mis reports 35 billion $ deal in next UK visit
Spread over 4 years.150 billion $ for railways investment
Not a concrete figure- seems very inflated in all honesty.Reports 35 billion $ for rafale deal
Again, not a credible figure and hard to calculate anyway given the nature of the FGFA (JV and such).Reports 35 billion $ deal for Pak Fa
The devil always lies in the detail.1 lakh crore for Bihar
80000 crore for J&k
Really? What kind of deals with the UK amount to such a figure? The Hawk deal is only around $1BN and there don't seem to be any others on the table between India and the UK.
Spread over 4 years.
Not a concrete figure- seems very inflated in all honesty.
Again, not a credible figure and hard to calculate anyway given the nature of the FGFA (JV and such).
Either way all large defence deals (>$3BN or so) are paid out over a period of at least a decade and with India's economy adding hundreds of Billions of USD to its GDP and taxation revenues increasing by tens of billions year on year this is perfectly plausible.
The devil always lies in the detail.
Diplomats say that during his visit, India and Britain could strike deals worth 8-12 billion pounds ($12-$18 billion), although details remain sketchy.
Other than that I don't know what this $12-18 billion figure could possibly be made up of- it certainly doesn't relate to any additional defence deals (the Hawks are about the sum of defence deals between India and the UK these days), perhaps some further investment in the DMIC? Even $5 billion seems ambitious- let alone 12-18!
Interesting that the M777 will be discussed when he visits the UK (home of BAE) and not when he visited the US (where the original 145 gun deal was on offer from as part of a FMS). This pretty much confirms the speculation that he/the GoI is looking for some sort of local production of the M777 and not a simple off the shelf purchase.
I don't think this is quite accurate mate. By all accounts the issues with the FGFA are that India isn't happy with the amount of development contribution it will be allowed to make despite the fact it will have to burden 50% of such costs. From the outset the GoI was looking to use this deal to extract industrial benefits (specifically on the development side) for Indian firms.The problem with the Sukhoi/HAL PMF is that India wants a deal like the 30mki which was not possible because when we opted for sukhoi 30mki it was a matured fighter while PAK FA is still developing and evolving.
Russia wanted India as a development partner to invite more investment and share development cost which we should have done rather then looking for an another deal like sukhoi 30mki.
Zero Money for Bihar now. Nitish Kumar said he doesn't need any money from Center. So we will now use Bihar money to buy PAKFA.Don't know how close is this close...
Reports 35 billion $ for rafale deal
Mis reports 35 billion $ deal in next UK visit
Reports 35 billion $ deal for Pak Fa
150 billion $ for railways investment
1 lakh crore for Bihar
80000 crore for J&k
Damn how rich are we ?
No body can beat this Business group promises.
Zero Money for Bihar now. Nitish Kumar said he doesn't need any money from Center. So we will now use Bihar money to buy PAKFA.
I think policy is, natural resources obtained from a state will receive the benefit in its entirety
Bihar is rich in minerals , will benefit the most.
Sorry but you seem to forget that Jharkhand is a seperate state now. And all minerals went to to Jharkhand.
Bihar has zero minerals, zero industry and hence zero source of income. But somehow Nitishji will generate 2.25 Lakh Crores and Bihar will be the most developed State...soon.