What's new

Russia Captures Two CIA Assets Who ‘Planned’ Sinai Plane Crash.

wrong, the worst is when you use RT to proof an Anti-American point.

What will you do when I use Fox news to proof a Pro-America Hawkish point? You would have called me an Idiot. Same thing you do with RT and your own point.
RT or not, the facts are there from the video. The US state defence spokeswoman is challenged for location and she refused to answer. The video also precisely pinpoin the location of the alleged bomb hospital which is still intact. These are facts shown on video to billions of viewers. You expect CNN or Foxnews to report the truth? Lol...
 
.
If it's true, those cia terrorists must suffer public execution to be broadcasted live by cnn and fox news in the terrorist stronghold america.
 
.
Israel / CIA is 100% involved in Russian plane crash

1- They tried to blame crash of Ukrainian plane on Russia (Failed no one believed it)
2- They tried to blame crash of Malasian plane on Russia (Failed no one believed it)
3- They used a missile to bring down Passenger plane for Russia (Blamed it on 3rd party : failing as Russia found out)
4- Now they are trying other tactics
 
.
RT or not, the facts are there from the video. The US state defence spokeswoman is challenged for location and she refused to answer. The video also precisely pinpoin the location of the alleged bomb hospital which is still intact. These are facts shown on video to billions of viewers. You expect CNN or Foxnews to report the truth? Lol...

lol... facts is whatever they make you believe.

What do you mean by "truth" lol, you trusted the source (Which is RT) and that you did not doubt whatever its reporting, that's what "truth" for you.

But if you bother to look at the video at all, you will see two or 3 seamed cut which indicated intercut in the video. Which basically mean they manipulated the video by cutting Elizabeth Response (Either within the same question or different question) instead of showing you the whole flow.

Did Russia actually bomb that hospital? Honestly I don't care, but in this case, what RT use to support the case that the Russia does bomb the hospital is a photograph that taken after the bombing "Allegedly" portraying the hospital is still standing, and the dodgy response from the US State Department.

While Syria being a Muslim Majority country, many building could have been located next to a dome shaped structure. Where most Islamic building (such as mosque) are dome shape. They just show a picture of some build next to a dome and you think that's enough to proof that is the same building?

This is the photo the Russian Released.

2015-11-02_sarmin2-ru5.jpg


If you care to look at the photo closely, you would know the two is not the same building, they are closed

You can see the pipe of the "Dome" building have extruded outside the external building wall (facing the camera) on the 2014 picture, but it was significantly shorter on the Russian release on the left. Which is not even half across the building length

And the black line on the Russian photo represent the LOS (Line of Sight) of the camera angle of the taken by the 2014 camera. If the angle position represent the true azimuth, then the building wall in front o the dome should not covered 1/3 of the dome as you see on the 2014 picture. If you draw a straight line from the camera representing what your eyes see thru the lenses. The dome should be cleared off the building.

(By the way, I draw the black line away from the centre of the camera angle, depicting that is the maximum view the camera going to give and it still not able to cover the dome)

Then the so called Press release supposedly embarrassing the US state department for them to tell lies...

But then those are truth to you as you never question RT when they are going about Anti-Americanising. lol
 
Last edited:
.
lol... facts is whatever they make you believe.

What do you mean by "truth" lol, you trusted the source (Which is RT) and that you did not doubt whatever its reporting, that's what "truth" for you.

But if you bother to look at the video at all, you will see two or 3 seamed cut which indicated intercut in the video. Which basically mean they manipulated the video by cutting Elizabeth Response (Either within the same question or different question) instead of showing you the whole flow.

Did Russia actually bomb that hospital? Honestly I don't care, but in this case, what RT use to support the case that the Russia does bomb the hospital is a photograph that taken after the bombing "Allegedly" portraying the hospital is still standing, and the dodgy response from the US State Department.

While Syria being a Muslim Majority country, many building could have been located next to a dome shaped structure. Where most Islamic building (such as mosque) are dome shape. They just show a picture of some build next to a dome and you think that's enough to proof that is the same building?

This is the photo the Russian Released.

View attachment 271918

If you care to look at the photo closely, you would know the two is not the same building, they are closed

You can see the pipe of the "Dome" building have extruded outside the external building wall (facing the camera) on the 2014 picture, but it was significantly shorter on the Russian release on the left. Which is not even half across the building length

And the black line on the Russian photo represent the LOS (Line of Sight) of the camera angle of the taken by the 2014 camera. If the angle position represent the true azimuth, then the building wall in front o the dome should not covered 1/3 of the dome as you see on the 2014 picture. If you draw a straight line from the camera representing what your eyes see thru the lenses. The dome should be cleared off the building.

(By the way, I draw the black line away from the centre of the camera angle, depicting that is the maximum view the camera going to give and it still not able to cover the dome)

Then the so called Press release supposedly embarrassing the US state department for them to tell lies...

But then those are truth to you as you never question RT when they are going about Anti-Americanising. lol

Of cos as a great imperialism American, you will use lie to cover another lie. Clearly, Russian are very fore coming telling you the location of the hospital while the US defense state spokewoman will just keep avoiding the question and not saying a single info on exact of the location of the so called "bombed hospital"
 
.
Of cos as a great imperialism American, you will use lie to cover another lie. Clearly, Russian are very fore coming telling you the location of the hospital while the US defense state spokewoman will just keep avoiding the question and not saying a single info on exact of the location of the so called "bombed hospital"

Then can you answer me why the pipe is magically shorter in just 10 months and why the building in front of the dome move away from the dome in that 10 months?

Cos the photo does not match otherwise
 
.
Then can you answer me why the pipe is magically shorter in 10 months on both photo and why the building in front of the dome move away from the dome in that 10 months?
You claimed after 10months? Can 10months change a lot things in building struture especially this is not a huge building. Sure its can.

My turn to ask you, why US state of defense refused to give location of their so called " Russian bombed hospital" when challenged? Becos its fabricated, right? :D
 
.
You claimed after 10months? Can 10months change a lot things in building struture especially this is not a huge building. Sure its can.

My turn to ask you, why US state of defense refused to give location of their so called " Russian bombed hospital" when challenged? Becos its fabricated, right? :D

As you say, 10 months can change a lot of thing, then HOW DO YOU KNOW THE TWO ARE THE SAME BUILDING?

And the "Press Release" is a cut and shut job, as I said, there are 2 to 3 static seams in that RT video on State Department, suggest the footage is cut to the response to look like that.
 
.
As you say, 10 months can change a lot of thing, then HOW DO YOU KNOW THE TWO ARE THE SAME BUILDING?
Becos Russia is very forecoming in anouncing the exact location while sneaky double head snake liar US refuse to say a thing. More or less show who is the real liar. :D

US is nation using underhand and lies to put up its strength. I feel ashamed for all Americans :D

No American shall be proud of their US government heritage.
 
.
Becos Russia is very forecoming in anouncing the exact location while sneaky double head snake liar US refuse to say a thing. More or less show who is the real liar. :D

You do know you just admit you don't know whether or not the two are the same building.

And again, the RT video on State Department is a cut and shut job. You can see the bad editing work in that video...Even worse than the North Korean missile attack on America video I saw a few years ago LOL
 
.
You do know you just admit you don't know whether or not the two are the same building.

And again, the RT video on State Department is a cut and shut job. You can see the bad editing work in that video...Even worse than the North Korean missile attack on America video I saw a few years ago LOL

The shame is you after failing to answer why US refuse to give exact location of their so called "Russia bombed hospital".

Obviously, US fabricated the news. How can they provide exact location when all these are fakes and lies make up by US. Shame on USA. A pack of lies and double head snake.
 
.
The shame is you after failing to answer why US refuse to give exact location of their so called "Russia bombed hospital".

Obviously, US fabricated the news. How can they provide exact location when all these are fakes and lies make up by US. Shame on USA. A pack of lies and double head snake.

I did answer you, you, on the other hand, had not answer me why the two building have discrepancies on both picture.

If you run the video the RT reporting "Grilling" the State Department spoke person on the RT website, you will find at least 2 static seams on that video.

The first seam is at 3:07 turning 3:08 you can literally see the Russian Reporter freeze for 1 second then a seamed cut and then cut to the State Department spoke person.

Another is at 3:33. And you will see the exact same footage from 3:11 when she (State Department Spoke person) look to her left but this time cut to an AP reporter.

The video the RT use is a fake, it is a cut and paste job . The RT reporter may have asked the question, but the response is cut on either from the same question or from a different question
 
.
US is fully capable of doing this. Only when the country falls the world will know about the attrocities this country has committed-of course those that we don't know-the ones we already know is genocide in DROC, nuclear weapons used on Japan and chemical weapons used in Fallujah on civilian populations. These are what we know-what we don't might reveal much.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom