They used the word foreign interference, what exactly would you call foreign interference in the matters of a sovereign country as? I mean your whole argument is so laughable or rather should I say pathetic that it does not merit a response.
I think what is laughable is your desperation. In 1998 USA tried very hard - multiple calls, multiple channels - but could not dent our decision. If you think that 'interference' in March 2022 is something to talk about then the one in 1998 needs books. And yet nobody cried conspiracy then. Repeat after me - Correlation is not Causation. As long as you remember this, # of conspiracies occupying your mind drops precipitously.
3.5 years isn't what you call PTI has had its time. PTI should have been allowed to complete its tenure before labeling them out as failures or saying that they had their time.
Insafis wanted 70 years. But sorry, we could hardly bear the 3.5 years. Also, do note that no PM has run the country for that long, apart from Z. A. Bhutto & only NS comes close (without the one-page luxury though). So let us wait until PTI gets another shot & then see the results. Frankly I have no high hopes from the PTI lot based on 44 months' performance.
What performance are you referring to when you did not let government complete its tenure. The kind of economy that was handed over to PTI with just 9 billion in foreign reserves, PTI did much better leaving 22 in the coffers, all that besides Corona, inflated fuel prices due to war.
I did not do anything. I am not responsible for IK's arrogance & ineptness. If, despite the one-page luxury, he could not bring any significant improvement, then how do you expect coalition partners to suffer with him? Don't you know that coalition partners are equally blamed for government performance? Why would they prop an unpopular government? Stop making (non)excuses.
Check your figures. They are all wrong, because you hear PTI propaganda & run with it without realizing that this is the party of fake news, lies, misrepresentation, abuse, & all the other faults that you see in each & every Politics thread on PDF. Here, take a look:
https://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/forex.pdf & stop depending on hearsay.
MNA's are themselves on record saying they have been bribed or made offers to change parties. Do you really believe the MNA crossed the floor because their consciousness suddenly woke up? Don't pretend to be so damn naive.
Which MNAs? Those who you blame or those who needed to prop the PTI narrative? A cult member calling a normal person naive is very funny.
PTI wanted the senate election to be held with a show of hand, guess who objected to this? Gillani Son's video went viral yet the election commission of N league never did anything.
Oh come off the high horse. Do you remember what happened in Daska elections when PTI in collusion with Buzdar admin abducted Returning Officers? How about hidden cameras that were caught in Senate elections? The constitution mandates private ballot, except in selection of the leader of the PM. If things were done per the constitution, then why are you bringing up a non-issue? If PTI wanted a vote by show of hand, then what does that imply? It means that PTI wanted to control its own members & allies. Is that a good enough reason to insist despite the law?
President sent a reference to the SC way before voting of no confidence yet SC did not give a verdict on it, yet opened on Sunday to take a notice of something they had no jurisdiction over the affairs of the Parliament as per article 69 of the constitution. There is no conspiracy, these are all facts.
Go ask SC about the Presidential reference. I am not judges' spokesman. Also, when Speaker of the house violates the constitution, then SC has to step in. PTI talking point of Article 69 was thoroughly trashed & nobody but die-hard partisans like yourself still take it seriously.
Moreover, If you are implying that SC was part of a conspiracy, then do remember that two judges of the bench gave a huge boost to PTI's fortunes by being part of a controversial decision in the Panama Leaks case. Its far better to follow common sense than to insist on PTI talking points.
Tell me something why is this PDM so against the electronic voting machines? Because they know they won't be able to manipulate and rig elections with the help of their local and international benefactors. If PTI was indeed a king's party, they would not be taking steps to stop rigging.
EC is against the EVM & for many reasons. There has to be a vetting process. Where is it? Do you think that EC ought to adopt just any scheme that a sitting government comes up with? It is not just about EVM. People distrust technology when it comes to elections. Remember RTS crashing down in GE2018? Yes that is what I mean.
Stop talking about benefactors when you are talking about something that has not even had a pilot run in our system. Imagine International benefactors coming over to Pakistan, visiting polling stations, & secretly stamping ballot papers..... Wow, what a mental image. PTI was King's party & the one-page narrative proves it. Also GE2018 rigging is a fact. Who did it? Read up & then come talk to me.
Your above argument justifies just that. as for the false cases right! we have seen how records have disappeared into thin air, and what money trials were given by the Sharifs other than Qattari letter, and Meri UK main to Kya Pakistan main be koi property nahi.
Stop making a fool out of yourself. We all know your deep love for the corrupt and morally bankrupt, just don't expect others to follow suit.
Your love for liars, frauds, & cheats is self-evident. You support subversion of constitution. You support those who undermine our constitution. You have never criticized any of their misdeeds & lies. Why? Those whom you call morally bankrupt faced the courts & legal consequences & still in the ring as a voice for their constituents. OTOH, we have a cry baby IK wreaking havoc to our system & yet you support him blindly. Just wait a little while & see when PTI's scandals are investigated. Then I will ask you to defend him.
