The point is the flawed line of argument. The whole cultist, populist line of argument can be fit on any movement to discredit it.Who would do that? Name them & show an example of someone having done that. Yes, I am calling out your strawman.
There is another implicit problem. You are indirectly comparing IK with our founding father. What a shame.
He is not presenting himself as messiah but just another leader. What he is claiming is not different then any other political leader of the world.Anyone who presents himself as messiah & cultivates a cult of his personality & call for violence, while himself being devoid of decency, tolerance, & foresight, would be called a fascist.
There is no call to violence. Only a political movement. Same as many leaders used when needed.
I can list down from our own founding fathers to Nelson Mandela to Martin Luther King Jr. using street protests. I guess all of them are fascists.
Again before you accuse me of trying to portray IK as equal to the founding father. The purpose is only to show the flaw in the argument.
Just the latest in the long line of labels from Yahoodi agent to the latest of being Hitler incarnate.If it walks like a duck & it qualks like a duck, then it is a duck.
Sorry doesn’t fly anymore but for people stuck in confirmation bias and echo chambers. Each time they would vouch the latest label to be true.
Some random guy versus being done by the very top leadership in conjunction with our beloved Hussain Haqqani to spread fake nude pictures of Benazir. Very fascist.Yeah, let us see who is fascist, shall we
Does fit the bill here though:If it walks like a duck & it qualks like a duck, then it is a duck.
Last edited: