Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just glad that everyone teamed up to slow things down. At least last two pages are not filled with news of what is or is not coming. The important thing is we keep it that way and rather than confirming or denying such things focus on implications of both. That would be much more constructive and informative.
My idea is that C-130 fits perfectly in that medium category, not a heavy weight strategic airlifted that we need very few of, if any, but not with a very limited load carrying capacity either (C-27J payload is approximately half of that of C-130). Suit us very well forming the backbone of army & air force airlift operations supported by limited number of heavier and lighter weight capacity aircraft.On that note @Arsalan I cannot see why Pakistan wants C-130Js and won't budge for something smaller. Perhaps 90% of the work the PAF engages in at the national level can be done cheaper by C-27Js which would have been easy to acquire as the US was holding back on the C-130s due to strategic airlift considerations.
I am sure Americans would want someone to take them off their hands.Basically, brand new aircraft, or barely used aircraft at bargain basement prices. Would fulfill 90% of the in country tasks of the C-130s. And... PAF just passed it over.
Could have been available many years ago... By now, PAF would have a solid transport fleet.
Opportunity missed...
New C-27J Cargo Planes Stored In Arizona Boneyard
Military 'Has No Use' For For The Spartans
New C-27J Spartan cargo planes ordered by the U.S. Air Force are being delivered ... directly to a storage "boneyard" in the Arizona desert. There are reportedly nearly a dozen new Spartans sitting on the ramp at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson, AZ.
The Dayton Daily News reports that the Air Force has spent some $567 million to acquire 21 new Spartans since 2007, but has found that the Air Force does not have missions for many of the aircraft.
The planes had originally been acquired because of their ability to operate from unimproved runways. But sequestration forced the Air Force to re-think the airplane's mission, and it determined that they were not a necessity, according to an analyst with the Project for Government Oversight.
The airplanes supported up to 800 jobs at Mansfield National Guard Base in Ohio, which led the state's congressional delegation to strongly support the continued acquisition of the airplanes, even though former Air Force Chief of Staff General Norton Schwartz said in a congressional hearing that the C-130 can do everything the C-27J can at nearly $100 million less per airplane.
President Barak Obama said during a campaign stop in Mansfield during the last election cycle said he promised to "find a mission" for the base there, which led to the transfer of several C-130 airplanes to Ohio.
But the C-27J Spartans are parked in the desert, and more are being built and delivered into storage. An Air Force spokesman said the program was "too near completion" to be able to terminate the program in a way that does not cost the taxpayers more than building the airplanes and sending them immediately to the boneyard. http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&id=e1aebd19-7147-4a0d-bac9-e4458f0f42da
Are MMW coming in PAA's AH1Zs?at least m sure u must be mmw longbow radar.10 tracking and two targets at a time
My idea is that C-130 fits perfectly in that medium category, not a heavy weight strategic airlifted that we need very few of, if any, but not with a very limited load carrying capacity either (C-27J payload is approximately half of that of C-130). Suit us very well forming the backbone of army & air force airlift operations supported by limited number of heavier and lighter weight capacity aircraft.
C-27 will only make sense to me if we are looking to get 20-25 of these in a mix of maritime patrol aircraft, EW & may be even ground attack along side the strategic transport ones. We know none of this is happening. Thus, sticking to C-130 AND to be supported by CN-235 in lower weight capacity roles.
PAF has observed C27 in past and have rejected it. From over simplification perspective, there are three lift categories in PAF; Heavy (Il-78), Medium (C130) and Light (CN-235). If need arises more CN-235 may come and in same timeline we might see a new Heavy lift aircraft too (Far future). C27 don't fit in.Actually the C-27J can lift a lot more than 50% of the C-130H:
C-130H:
Capacity: 19000 kg
C-27J:
Capacity: 11,600 kg
(61%)
Sometimes life is not perfect and what you want, you may not get. The US was stalling C-130J for Pakistan for quite a long time. So, the logical action should have been to go for something that will get the job done 90% of the requirement rather than not getting anything at all.
Its been more than a decade of trying to get C-130Js from the US. Tomorrow, if the US closes its doors and/or a war starts, who will you blame?
Did Pakistan learn anything from the aftermath of the end of the Cold War and the beginning of Pressler Amendments? Why are they largely unable to learn from their mistakes and repeat those mistakes over and over again...
So the alternative was, have 20 C-27J parked today, doing a large number of the airlift duties, thus saving the PAF C-130Hs flight hours. Being able to replenish most PAF FOBs. Pak could have customized a few for niche roles or even naval roles.
But instead, the choice chosen was to get nothing at all. While making a best effort to get C-130Js or more C-130Hs, knowing well that the US is able to make a country go round and round in a merry-go round circle. It could simply tell their Five Eyes partners to pretend to want to sell C-130Hs while making them go in circles and waste their time.
No.Are MMW coming in PAA's AH1Zs?
Yeah i said approximate for this reason.Actually the C-27J can lift a lot more than 50% of the C-130H:
C-130H:
Capacity: 19000 kg
C-27J:
Capacity: 11,600 kg
(61%)
Sometimes life is not perfect and what you want, you may not get. The US was stalling C-130J for Pakistan for quite a long time. So, the logical action should have been to go for something that will get the job done 90% of the requirement rather than not getting anything at all.
Its been more than a decade of trying to get C-130Js from the US. Tomorrow, if the US closes its doors and/or a war starts, who will you blame?
Did Pakistan learn anything from the aftermath of the end of the Cold War and the beginning of Pressler Amendments? Why are they largely unable to learn from their mistakes and repeat those mistakes over and over again...
So the alternative was, have 20 C-27J parked today, doing a large number of the airlift duties, thus saving the PAF C-130Hs flight hours. Being able to replenish most PAF FOBs. Pak could have customized a few for niche roles or even naval roles.
But instead, the choice chosen was to get nothing at all. While making a best effort to get C-130Js or more C-130Hs, knowing well that the US is able to make a country go round and round in a merry-go round circle. It could simply tell their Five Eyes partners to pretend to want to sell C-130Hs while making them go in circles and waste their time.
PAF has observed C27 in past and have rejected it. From over simplification perspective, there are three lift categories in PAF; Heavy (Il-78), Medium (C130) and Light (CN-235). If need arises more CN-235 may come and in same timeline we might see a new Heavy lift aircraft too (Far future). C27 don't fit in.
No.
Just because any thing exists in reserves does not mean its available for export.Rejecting things are easy. We can just make up as many categories we want. But CN-235 cannot be bought with US funds. Meaning Pakistan would have to pay for them with hard currency. Is that even meaningful in the current situation?
There is a huge amount of CSF just left unused. Seems either Pakistan is swimming with money or something is not making sense. There is just no meaningful rationale to this.
@Arsalan alright I guess the PAF rationale is hell with these Americans. We will get the C-130s by hook or by crook. And if nothing materializes, who needs CSF? Just dump that money into the river, see if we care. We have our nice, neatly created lift categories and you better give them to us in those categories son.
When we will seek them we will be far ahead of these 'current conditions'.But CN-235 cannot be bought with US funds. Meaning Pakistan would have to pay for them with hard currency. Is that even meaningful in the current situation?
Are MMW coming in PAA's AH1Zs?
does it have soft kill or hard kill capabilitiesWith Version 6 upgrade