What's new

Rotten Tree of Democarcy Must Be Uprooted

Democarcy-representative govt is the only way forward......let there be a few elections in a row and the people wil get clever and vote better people in.
In AJK there has been non stop election for the past so many decades even if there is a military govt in power or not.This has led to people from voting for the same guy to throwing them out and bringing in each time more competent people how have given the people the majority of the things they want.
For sure we need to tinker with the system to make it better but it is a lot better the having a military govt.
 
.
Democracy by some famous Westerners

Some snippets of wisdom from their own mouths.
George Bernard Shaw - Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the few.
Oscar Wilde - Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people.
HL Mencken stated that Democracy is also a form of religion it is the worship of jackals by jackasses.
 
.
What is the alternative?
Dictatorship?
or Rule by the priest, in the name of god?
 
.
Democracy by some famous Westerners

Some snippets of wisdom from their own mouths.
George Bernard Shaw - Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the few.
Oscar Wilde - Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people.
HL Mencken stated that Democracy is also a form of religion it is the worship of jackals by jackasses.

Depends on how you define Democracy.....please do tell us what you think is better.
 
.
Reviving the Reformist Atmosphere

In this article, I will try to propose possible viable solutions for us Pakistanis to get ourselves out of this horrendous quagmire filled to the brim with conspiracies, plots and agendas. What we must focus on first is how to bring about a soft revolution. It Is said that revolutions are not made, they happen. All that is required from our part is a solid determination and willfull perseverance to keep going through thick and thin, no matter how many hurdles are placed along the path. Sacrifices will and must be given, we cannot expect to turn the system topsy turvy without offering any.

Starting at the grassroots level, we realize that to go forth with our motives, we should be under the aegis of a sound practical ideology, which will engulf us in its golden principles and ideals. For Communists, Karl Marx had proposed “communique ideals” for socialists, which seemed at first to be quite successful in the former USSR but later murdered itself vilely. Here in Pakistan, so-called historians and thinkers forget that the very idea of Pakistan started with a vision Allama Iqbal had in a dream. That of a state where the Muslims of the Subcontinent could live in liberty according to the sacred principles of Islam. If all this was meant to be personal, the Muslims were still at a precariously better situation in India. But they were not allowed to implement their socio-politico-economic laws on a manifest scale, as they had the right to.

Hence came the furtherance for the Two Nation Theory, propounded by those same people, Iqbal and Jinnah, who once propagated for Indian Unity. They realized that not only the Muslim, but the ‘Islamic’ civilization in the Subcontinent was itself at stake. This nation was not meant to be a secular domain where Muslims could privately practice their deen (way of life), it is a big hypocrisy on their behalf. They were to adopt all the Islamic norms, all beautifully summed up by Liaquat Ali Khan in the Objectives Resolution. We have to accept that Islam is our only beacon of guidance, not an age-old preposterous sham like Democracy. Imagine, a barbarious system of governance formulated by Plato in olden times was meant to be implemented in a state that was formed for the Muslim and foremostly Islamic cause! Did our forefathers chant “Pakistan ka matlab kya, La Ilaha il-Allah” or “Pakistan ka matlab kya? Jeo Jamhooriyat?” In 1947, the largest human migration took place, millions of Muslims were killed, tortured, raped and here we have demented bureaucracy and “feeder-ship” (getting feed from the West), not leadership, vehemently opposing the very perfect defined Islamic ideology of Pakistan.

The key solution is to create a voluntary widespread mass-awareness movement which shall focus on re-kindling the essence of Iqbaliat and Quaid’s practices. We should re-educate the distracted youth of today that like the hundreds of dignified leaders to look up to like the Ali Brothers (Maulana Johar and Shaukat), Ch. Rehmat Ali and Liaquat Ali Khan, we have to fundamental saviours to learn from and be passionately motivated by: Allama Iqbal (the Reformer of the Modern Age) and Muhammad Ali Jinnah (The Grey Wolf). The best way to achieve this is by introducing educational syllabi reforms, an important need of the hour. We have been learning the same ‘expired’ old syllabi for 2 generations, except very few minor changes. A committee of Muslim scholars and academics from every school of jurisprudence should be formed wherein they could formulate a unified Islamic syllabus in concensus with historical facts and the Islamic Golden Age. This ofcourse includes the teaching of mathematics, science and technology and computers but in appropriate context of Islamic History and how Muslims contributed to the field.

Furthermore, it would be nice to have students learning International Relations from college level onwards, so that they are en par with what is happening around the world. They are already being taught Pakistan Studies, which is good, but beyond that they should also be given access to knowledge and the latest updates of how Pakistan is playing its role from a global perspective, how it influences the world and vice versa.

Student Intellectual Groups: There are new energetic student groups propping up these days, especially using social networking sites, such as the popular Facebook, as platforms. It will be good to see students being encouraged to go ahead and create a “student thinktank forum” where they could discuss issues not only of politics, but also related to moral/ethical character building, its implementation, etc. Possible heads and management staff of these thinktanks could include leading professors from around the country, media personalities, etc who believe in the (Islamic) Ideology of Pakistan, not apologetic self-professed defeatist atheists like Pervez Hoodhboy, Nadeem Paracha or Asma Jehangir.

Fresh new and fully detailed high quality documentaries on “THE HISTORY OF PAKISTAN” should be produced on an official scale by the Government, if ever it decides to go something productive for the nation’s youth for a change! These CDs and pamphlets should be distributed across the country and should also be available for purchasing online for Pakistanis abroad. They can be very educational for those who really don’t get into reading text on it. Ofcourse it might sound funny even expecting anything remote to this from the Government, but one can always request as a citizen.

It is an ardent appeal to the nation’s elders: It is our time now, and that of those who are growing. Please get up and make this a duty of yours to pass on the Legacy of Pakistan to the coming generation, a sort of age-old “Chinese Whisper” secret, if I may say so. We it is who can bring the change. We don’t believe in picking up arms for now, but first of all, our foundation and character should be strong, hence we have to first re-ignite the Spirit of Shaheen amongst the youth. How pitiful that our elders and those we look up to fight like masquerading baboons on mainstream television shows all day blabbering about things long gone.

There are a few media heroes for the youth of today, whom they look upto. Some of them have a very deep insight into history, Islamic and World Affairs and give messages of hope to the coming perplexed generation. Such rare gems are termed as “conspiracy theorists” or “televangelists” by a particular breed of self-professed atheists who obviously have no concern whatsoever for the unrivalled connection the State of Pakistan has with Deen e Islam. After looking at such people, hearing their worthless arguments, the youth of Pakistan get dismayed again as they feel they speak for “the others”.

Pakistan’s history is as old as the entrance of Muhammad bin Qasim into Sindh. We have a dearth of great dignified heroes and leaders to look upto and be taught their biographies and how they lived their lives, but all the focus of the mainstream’s focus is on “formal, scientific education” which is limited just to the blunt materialistic plane.

At the end I would like to say, living nations are those whose nationals take it upon themselves to actually “keep the nation alive”. Instead of sitting hand on hand and waiting for some apocalyptic messiah to come and do all the hard work on their behalf. This is not the Law of Change. A messiah will come indeed, but unless we realize that “God helps those who help themselves”

//PKKH

:pakistan:
 
.
"In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand-fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers... we are ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.” - Alexander Solzehnitsyn
 
.
the rise of a country doesnt really depends on the mode of politics, democracy.
from malaysia case we can see it is the economic achievement that binds the society and stabilize the country as the people are going to equitably share the fruit of development. singapore is a truly elite secular administered city, malaysian export much depends on singapore demand, some may how can singapore affects malaysia so much,but yes it is the fact.
an intelligent and responsible manager of a country will enact people welfare oriented policies and in return the people heart will be pacified and strive for the future of their own country and individuals. a good positive feedback cycle it is.
noted that a vicious cycle for the fate of the country can be happened in this way: a mediocre management of a country that doesnt or fail to envision the future development trend will surely incur the growth of corruption which enhance the destabilization of the impoverished soceity, the country then gets further weakened and then some ill intention big country might intervene the country internal affairs and then manipulate its economy for national interests of big country, that is the story based on simple logic, but many people was mainly deceived by falsed facts propagated thus fail to avoid the fate of mishap.
 
.
We have to become good human beings first, the rest would follow.

I just finished reading a summary of European statistics on homicide going back six centuries. It turns out that when the mass of the people were most immured in religion and concern about "good" conduct (the 14th-15th century) the rate of homicide was highest. I suspect that's because "good" folks were easy victims of "bad" folks.

I suspect that individual efforts to concentrate on being a good human being won't be as effective as better governance, law enforcement, and an education that imbues its students with a love for peaceful and profitable pursuits.

Winston Churchill: "Democracy is the worst form of government, but for all the others."
 
.
Perhaps the question that needs to be answered first is: Is Pakistan a democracy?

There are the clothes of democracy but to a large extent they are still being worn by those that had power under the feudal system.

Feel free to critisise democracy after all freedom of expresion is one of the things that make it an almost working system. However talk of throwing off democracy and trying some thing else perhaps should wait till Pakistan has had a chance to try democracy that doesnt involve the few same old families running things?

Timocracy is still a better idea anyway.
 
.
Democracy cannot work in places there is high illiteracy and people dont know who to elect and who is the right leader for them. Additionally, often you have NGOs doing hysterical and irrational things which slows down progress further. Look at how fast China and UAE has developed without democracy. The speed and scale is unprecedented. Only when countries become developed is when democracy is a good option.
 
.
When did Jinnah say that we should not vote our leaders into power?
 
.
Open Letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Your Excellency,

Allow me to apologize to you for not being able to be present during your address to civil society at the hallowed campus of Government College University in my beloved city of Lahore. Much as I would have wanted to benefit from the wisdom of your analysis and foresight, I could not make the journey quickly enough from the remote town of Chilas where I was in consultation with the proponents of a major dam which shall displace 32,000 people and submerge 32,000 ancient rock carvings if and when built. Allow me to further explain that since flights were cancelled from the nearest airport in Gilgit, a tedious five hour journey on the Karakoram Highway, I was compelled to take the road journey over the Babusar Pass situated at an altitude of 14,000 feet above sea level, travelling a total of eighteen hours to Islamabad.

Your Excellency, it was during this eighteen hour journey through some of the most desolate yet spectacular landscape of my country that I imagined speaking to you, being unable to join the privileged few who were invited to hear you speak both in Lahore and in Islamabad. As the vehicle carrying us made its way carefully over open culverts fashioned by the able engineers of the China Construction Company, as it slid over six inches of freshly falling snow, as it dipped into crevices swirling with glacial melt, and as it glided smoothly over the bits of tarmac which have survived the devastation of the 2005 earthquake which killed 70,000 people in these remote parts, I spoke to you, imagining that you were truly interested in what I, an ordinary citizen of this, my beloved, blighted country had to say.

But before I put those words down on paper, Your Excellency, allow me to welcome you to my country, this broken jaw of your kingdom. Allow me also to congratulate you, belatedly, on your appointment as Secretary of State of the most powerful nation on earth. That President Barak Obama had the prescience to see a woman in this commanding position is also a move worthy of appreciation. That you were his opponent in the Democratic Party’s primaries shows the objectivity and wisdom in President Obama’s selection. That you are a woman signifies the possibility that you will bring sanity to the White House, and by extension, to the Pentagon. For if the world was to be run by women, Your Excellency, it is quite possible that today we may not be mourning the brutal deaths of millions killed in the many wars over the past many centuries.

Your Excellency, it was at the outset of the second Gulf War in March 2004 that I resigned from my honorary position as Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations to which I had been appointed by Dr. Nafis Sadiq, then the Executive Director of the United Nations Population Fund. For five years I had tried to bring to the attention of my department the fact that the issue of population, poverty, and peace cannot be addressed without empowering women to deal with all of these. It was, and still is, my firm belief that women will not choose war over negotiating peace, that given a choice, they will not produce children who must go hungry, that they are the backbone of a nation’s economy and cultural articulation, and that they hold the key to the myriad conflicts which rage like an uncontrollable conflagration, destroying a world built by men and predicated on inequity and injustice.

It is unfortunate that I was unable to convince my department of the value of the genuine empowerment of Pakistan’s women, beyond the provision of services and family planning counselling. It is equally unfortunate that I was being seen as the face of the United Nations at a point when this esteemed organization was totally impotent in the face of your country’s insistence on invading Baghdad. My protest at this incapacity led to my resignation, something I have never regretted and would do time and time again, for protest is my right, and practically the only thing left to me to use with clarity, dignity and purpose. And it is through this fissure that I hope to be able to insert these words, Your Excellency, through the cracks in the daunting security which surrounds you during your visit to my country.

Your Excellency, before me, wrapped in a piece of fabric stained with grime and fragile with wear, lie the gifts I received from the family I recently visited in the hamlet of Thor which straddles a glacial stream rushing down the majestic Karakoram mountains. This parcel was given to me by the woman whom I met while conducting a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment for the proponent of the Diamer Basha Dam. It contains what she had gathered in the fading light of autumn from the forest surrounding her stone hovel which she shares with eight children, her husband, several goats, a cow, two dogs and a ginger kitten with a broken leg. Lying inside this piece of fabric were a couple of pomegranates, some dried mulberries, and a handful of apricot kernels.

When I shook out the piece of cloth containing these precious gifts, I realized that it had been carefully embroidered with intricate designs resembling the motifs I had seen etched into the dark surface of the igneous rock which lies scattered across hundreds of miles of this desolate landscape, described as the “abomination of isolation” by the British who wished to consolidate the far reaches of their empire in the nineteenth century. That this family lived just besides the 19th century British-built rest-house, perched on a cliff over-looking the thundering rivulet running down from the melting snows, appeared to me a fitting irony: rampant poverty living in the shadows of the greatest empire of the modern world.

I listened helplessly as my host explained in a language unknown to me that her husband was being threatened by the powerful land-owners of the area to give up his little patch of land on which his family eked out a meagre existence. This patch of land shall not be submerged by the 100 kilometre long reservoir of the proposed dam, but before the river is dammed, this family, and many like them, shall be damned to displacement, dispossession, and the absolute disarticulation of everything they have known for centuries: their music, their songs, their stories, their way of life. There shall be many like them, “collateral damage” in the path of progress of a country starved of energy and full to the brim with contradictions which flame the fire of terror.

Why do I tell you this simple story, Your Excellency? Why should you be concerned about the lives of an obscure family living in some remote region of a country considered to be the pariah of nations for its involvement in the breeding of terror? Why should your mind be cluttered by the details of the lives of ordinary Pakistanis who struggle to survive all sorts of neglect and deprivation? After all, the simple mantra chanted by your government and those before it is that by bringing democracy to these conflicted lands, the world shall be a safer place. And democracy is what supposedly describes the dispensation in our Parliament today, and even for the several years before that, despite the fact that the self-appointed head of state was nothing but a military despot wearing the disguise of well-cut suits.

I tell you this simple story for the simple reason that perhaps the problem lies in the details, Your Excellency, in the details of ordinary lives. The problem itself is simple, and the solution is not as simplistic as American foreign policy would like us to believe. The problem, Your Excellency, is the wilful and malevolent perpetuation of a universal state of inequity and injustice – a state of dangerous contradictions poised to implode despite the many hasty and ill-thought out designs to alleviate the burden of poverty and privation. Today I see you standing before a computer, accompanied by a permanently beaming President and a stately Minister who gives away money to the needy, once a month, as long as the needy are defined by a certain parameter.
Your Excellency, apparently you are to push a button on the computer which shall randomly select a winning family which shall benefit from the munificence of a government functioning almost entirely on the rhetoric generated by martyrdom. That this family is then to return the awarded amount while those in government have loans worth millions of dollars written off is an irony as sharp as the fact that the family in Thor Nallah had never heard of this benevolent scheme, nor have they ever received the benefit of electricity which could possibly power a computer on which their names could be listed.

Your Excellency, I had worked with my mother in the region of Gilgit Baltistan for thirteen years before her untimely death in the region she had come to love. For most of the people of this region, as for most of the people of the four provinces of my beloved country, such schemes have remained inaccessible, much like gainful employment, health care, education, land, and the most ubiquitous of all rights: justice. It is ironic that those who have denied the people of Pakistan these essential rights are the ones you are now accompanied by: the grinning and ingratiating folk who surround you on your visit. Your Excellency, how can we possibly be anointed with the ink of Democracy when the parchment we have been writing on is brittle with conflict, fragile with prejudice, and infested with a feudal ethos which eats into the very fabric of democratic principles? How can we, ordinary Pakistanis, believe that those with whom you do business are truly representing our interests, the interests of the family in the Thor Nullah and countless others like them in Awaran, in Badin, in Zhob, in Gwadar, in Dir, in Bakkhar?
Your Excellency: I am not trying to dissuade you from your noble mission to inform us of what is already written in blood, the blood of men and women and children killed in a war we did not create. As I write this, news filters in of the deadly bombing of the heart of my father’s beloved city Peshawar. Tonight the sound of mourning, of women wailing for lost children, of babies seeking lost mothers, shall fill the sky above my country. Can you hear that song, Your Excellency, that lament of despair, that elegy to a nation defeated by those who sold it for another song, a song of greed and a malignant lust for power? That is not a song anyone would willingly want to hear, and unless you and those in positions as significant as yours are willing to hear that elegy, I fear that very soon, too soon perhaps, there shall be no space for further burials in this beloved, blighted country of mine.
In closing, allow me to offer you the lines of the wonderful British poet who made America his home:
I am moved by fancies that are curled /
Around these images, and cling: /
The notion of some infinitely gentle /
Infinitely suffering thing. (T.S. Eliot – Prelude)

Yours most sincerely,
Feryal Ali Gauhar
feryalkimail@yahoo.com
 
Last edited:
.
Open Letter To US Citizens

Dear citizens of United States,

We Pakistanis are ordinary beings like you, having the same dreams, same needs, ambitions, emotions, reservations and same passion if not more for our country. We like you, to feel the same regret for wars, same grief for the world problems, same distress towards injustice, same hopes for a better tomorrow. We, like you, also fantasize having serene borders, comfortable homes for our children, fine education, some leisure, and a satisfied mind that what we are contributing to this country and the world at large today will benefit us and our future generations tomorrow. We fancy the feeling of living in coziness of our homeland, away from overseas interventions and foreign-extremism in the exact same way as an average American desires.

We didn’t get our independence as a birthday present, we got it after much struggle and sacrifices (over 4 million lives were lost during the migration); after much strangling and many fatalities, we finally broke free of the quandary at the hands of British and Hindu rulers. After independence, we have shown remarkable progress in many areas despite having rulers who placed personal interests over national interests, who never really had to face the trauma of poverty, sickness, injustice, or leaving their loved ones behind to inhabit a land with no promises. Yet we did not give up and made a nation out of it. We did not fail as our current leaders try to put it, to solicit more and more aid to gratify their own greed. In our short history we have never been blessed with a true leader after our founder, and yet imagine our courage, we did not break down, we moved on and on. And we never really looked for shortcuts to this existence, we have paid plenitude.

We have now been presented with yet another aid package from your country which will be financed by American taxpayers money, which is the right of American citizens and on which we have got no claim. To your surprise neither do we need it to solve our problems. We do NOT need it. We have been seasoned to rely on our own resources, our own means; because at the end of the day this money will not be utilized for our poor nation it will land somewhere you cannot imagine its terminus to be. Period.

Let us give you a reality check, as the voice of our Pakistani country men and as a friendly gesture to the fellow citizens of U.S. who have a right to know. In all veracity this little aid which comes with a lot of dictation, will be utilized to finance foreign lavish trips of our government personnel who will take approximately 200 personnel including their family members to luxurious places. It will be utilized to provide notorious yet special security services that we cannot afford, to people who are not even part of the government but somehow our democratic rulers are much obliged to flatter. The so-called economic development this new aid promises will definitely not materialize. We know this because this has been happening for the last several decades.

The so-called promises to create jobs for us will never be fulfilled, whereby this money would rather be utilized for expanding the job market within the USA for the American people, which itself is being hit by the worst recession in decades. Not only that, the conditions mentioned will destabilize our civil system, will cripple our autonomy, our existence, will rob our craftsmen and the population on the whole of their much deserved earnings, and in turn will fan more frustration. The ordinary Pakistani is already paying a heavy return against the lending of IMF. Our electricity, fuel and other bills have been incremented, and those too over the dictation of the IMF. The Kerry Lugar Bill does not attempt to bring any solution for our challenges at all, instead, it will be sucking blood from our innocent population in the name of few miscreants who are not a part of us in the first place, in the name of a war that didn’t belong to us by any means and was imposed on us. Are we really attempting to build peace in here? Who are we fooling in the name of amity?

Islamic Republic of Pakistan is an independent country, which means that we are fully capable to take care of our needs, self reliant and competent like Islam teaches us to be. We do not rely on shortcuts for realization of our needs. By the grace of our creator, we have been seasoned to work hard and achieve the impossible. The elite on powerful positions do not in anyway represent the opinion of general public. In their sinister yet sadly successful efforts, public is kept so busy in their basic problems that they never really get to question them on where was the Aid money utilized and why was it even asked for in the first place.

Its time the U.S realized that and leave the treachery of aiding us on the face and stabbing us at our backs. As the voice of enlightened Pakistanis, let us assure you, we will be delighted if the same money is utilized in your own country to deal with the recession it faces, to deal with the crimes soaring high with U.S. topping the list of most crimes in the world in a year. We will be glad if it is also spent on researches and precautionary measures on why so many Americans die with stress-related diseases every year, why life is getting tougher and tougher for an average American family and their social values are declining. We urge you to ask your Government whether this aid package is really helping us, the fellow citizens of Pakistan, or are you helping our shameless government with their lifestyles and luxuries? Are you helping in setting up schools and better health care or fanning more extremism due to ill-utilization that our rulers will ensure and frustration that the brutal conditions on this sell-out package will bring for us? Are you actually helping to support our displaced countrymen or giving them more reason to hate you for financing our depraved rulers?

Your financial aid will not do us any good, since more than this amount already stays in the bank accounts of some of our narcissistic leaders, who occupy the ‘seats’ but are indifferent towards the distress of the majority. If you are still so keen to help us however, start sharing best practices, help us in establishing good governance, help us in making our systems more transparent, help us in medical researches, help us in building up universities to polish our youth else we really don’t need your help, we can help ourselves.

We also request you to ask your government on how this bill helps the American nation and us, when it will just land in a few pockets and exactly what will our unfortunate nation be faced with as conditions to comply, tragedy of which is unimaginable but appalling enough for us to reject any aid from U.S. at all! The Patriot act which has left your nation so vulnerable cannot be allowed to implement in Pakistan. Let us make it more apparent, we will not allow the U.S. access to any of our properties or our citizens. These citizens belong to a free country, accountable to none other than their own national laws and America as a knowledgeable and well-developed country should respect that. Our country is fully capable to deal with any miscreants itself and we have been doing it to our best since this so called war on terror started. We will not allow interference in any form whatsoever in the internal matters of our country, in its governance, in its institutions and above all in its authority that this bill carefully ensures. Our rulers may be dissolute, our nation is not.

Your country has not only deceived you in the name of wars to eliminate terror while being exceptionally involved in creating it, but it also has left many homeless, many innocent killed, many children orphans, many women widows, houses and hopes shattered. It hasn’t just betrayed us, it has betrayed you. And rest assured, the bullying tactics that your country specializes in will someday become a pit in itself. Haven’t we all started witnessing that it in front of our eyes already?

We however maintain, the U.S. citizens don’t deserve to be kept in darkness. Since World War II, your country has intimidated directly or indirectly at least 44 countries, if not more in the name of peace while creating havocs in real, distributing civil wars, turmoil, oppressing nations, breaking them into pieces, dictating policies that completely butcher the civil structure. As your infamous Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger once put it so correctly: “While being America’s enemy may be dangerous, being America’s friend is invariably fatal”. Who would comprehend that better than our nation, who has a history of 62 years being your ally and what did we get in return? Treachery, betrayal, deception?

What did the US get out of it; a deteriorating economy, a failed social structure, not to mention countless killed soldiers? It isn’t a surprise the same Kissinger who believed in brutal de-population of the world and whose policies your government still follows, also said “Soldiers are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy”.

Ask yourselves, are the U.S soldiers really worthless herds of cattle to be thrown into hostile territories just so that a few in the Govt. can benefit by selling their weapons to the U.S Govt., which buys them from these local multi-million dollar businesses at such dear cost of American tax-payers’ blood-earned money? Decide yourself, where this will lead you as a nation? This hatred your Government is mongering against your beautiful country is pushing you down the path of obscurity too, towards a point of no return.

We as responsible citizens of Pakistan request the responsible citizens of U.S. to really ask their government on the effectiveness of wars it has waged in the past and what it plans to wage in future. For instance, what did the Americans get out of the Vietnam war? Did the Vietnamese attack them? What did the Americans get out of the War between Iraq and Iran? What did the American people get out of the recent war in Afghanistan and Iraq? Did the American people get a share of the oil wealth that is being ripped off the Iraqis by use of brutal force?

Think about the latest package of deceit this Kerry Lugar Bill brings for us, the ruthless face of which we are already seeing, yet you are kept so oblivious to. We respectfully ask you to convince your government to keep the same money to themselves and utilize it to benefit your ailing economy, or maybe it can be used to return the debt that US owes to China.

Only then will we as a nation be inspired by the high spirits on your nation’s conscientiousness, and will be stimulated to follow your footsteps and will be thankful to you for our generations to come.

Sincerely,

A Pakistani.

//PKKH
 
.
A Smart Coup: Why One Last Military Intervention In Pakistan Remains A Possibility

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—”This was my first interaction with the soldier who commands the seventh largest military force on the face of the planet.”

With this catchy line, Dr. Farrukh Saleem began his brief and fascinating account of a meeting with General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani.

On Feb. 10, 2010, Gen. Kayani met a group of Pakistani commentators and security analysts. The briefing was the third since the military began asserting Pakistan’s legitimate security and strategic interests in Afghanistan and the region.

On January 28 and 29, Gen. Kayani told NATO commanders in Brussels that Pakistan’s legitimate security interests will have to be respected.

Earlier, he told Adm. Mike Mullen, Gen. David Petraeus, and Gen. Stanley McChrystal that instead of worrying about appeasing India, Washington better start paying attention to Pakistan.

This is a major development in the eight-year US-led war in Afghanistan.

At one point, Mr. Saleem makes an interesting observation about Gen. Kayani’s cool demeanor.

“Yes, he has the capacity for abstract thought, cold rationality and coarse creativity – all in one,” he says. “And yet he inhales reconstituted tobacco. Yes, he uses a filter and a cigarette holder. Yes, he never takes deep puffs and, yes, he only consumes half a cigarette at a time.”

At another point, Mr. Saleem makes an interesting use of pun. Talking about the general’s smoking habits, he says the following: ‘He knows that some of the things that he is doing are wrong, but still won’t give them up.’

Probably it’s a polite reference to the conspiracy theories that fill the US and British media, or the Am-Brit media, about Pakistan, its military and its intelligence agencies. So some skepticism is natural.

But the best part of his column in The News International was this concluding paragraph:

“I can tell you that I came back both proud but with a painful realisation; proud knowing that our legions are being led by strategic minds and sad to have discovered the much too visible an intellectual gap between our top political brains in Islamabad and our strategic minds at work in Rawalpindi. And what does he think about our politicians? When it’s breezy, hit it easy.

Could it be that the army rules not through the barrel of a gun but because of their intellectual superiority? Could it be that the army rules because our politicians have failed to institutionalize politics? Could it be that the army rules because our political parties do not transcend individual human intentions? Could it be that the army rules because it has structures, mechanisms of social order along with strategic thinking?”

In essence, Mr. Saleem hit at the core reason why the Pakistani military intervenes every time politicians lead the nation to a dead end.

Most importantly, the above reasoning answers even a more important question: Why the military mounts successful interventions and why the politicians can’t muster the moral authority to resist them.

Pakistani politicians remain a chaotic, undisciplined and shortsighted bunch. Their parties are messy and loose groupings of special interests in their crudest form. Almost all of them have lifetime leaders who never give way to fresh blood. And they are not public institutions but private, family-owned affairs.

Since the return to democracy in Pakistan in February 2008, hardly any of the parties in government or opposition devoted any high-level party meetings to education, health, culture and sports. None of them has plans in place for running the country. Worse, none has any vision.

The best place in Islamabad these days to see this mess in action is the National Defense University. Since 2002, the NDU has been holding the annual National Security Workshop. This is a unique 6-week course. It brings together politicians, military officers, businessmen, lawyers, social activists and journalists. The group is taken through a virtual tour into the corridors of strategic decision making in Pakistan. The course ends with a weeklong exercise that sees the class divided into a Pakistani government and a shadow government, complete with their own secretariat and staff. On the last day, the two governments frame and deliver a policy plan to deal with a hypothetical strategic crisis confronting Pakistan. The plan has domestic, military and foreign policy components. Often, senior commanders from Pakistani military’s General Headquarters attend the last day’s presentations.

NDU officials, both civilian and military, have one observation that has been constant during the past eight years of national security workshops: Military officers, businessmen, social activists and journalists often show the best performance. Politicians come last. Most can’t even draft a single-page policy brief, or work with a PowerPoint presentation.

In essence, middle class Pakistanis – military officers, businessmen, social activists and journalists – fair better than the politicians, mostly a feudal landowning elite.

This gets blurry sometimes, but you get the general idea.

And middle class Pakistanis can’t make it to political parties, let alone to the federal and regional parliaments and governments.

Elections might change this, but certainly not in the foreseeable future. And Pakistan may not have the luxury of time.

If the national deadlock continues with mounting domestic instability due to massive corruption and mismanagement by our politicians, the military may have to contend with one last intervention. It would be the last because if the military failed this time to help set Pakistan on the right track, it could be a free fall after that because Pakistanis are getting increasingly restless with the existing decay. Social turmoil simmers just beneath the surface.

If it comes to a military-led intervention, both military officers and politicians will have to stay out of actual power. The army chief may not become a chief executive. The military might have to look into a new concept called the ‘Smart Coup’, where the military can bring capable Pakistanis to power with a firm executable plan of reform over five years, or more, fully backed by the military. There may not be time to put the plan to vote. It will have to be implemented.

This would be the absolute last option. But we are nowhere near that right now. Gen. Kayani certainly has no such thing in mind according to people who have met him. He wants democracy to work for the time being and he has proven this by resisting several opportunities to intervene over the past two years.

Pakistan is full of resources and opportunities, but it lacks good leadership and clean management. Even the bare minimum of these two commodities is not available in today’s Pakistan.

Books on political science and theory in Washington and London can’t help with this. Pakistanis will have to do what’s best for their homeland.

//AQ
 
.
Not to sound like an idiot, but PKKH and AQ say it all. Does not even require scrolling down to see who the author would be.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom