What's new

Romans vs Han China

Status
Not open for further replies.

Type 052D

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
531
Reaction score
0
Han Chinese troops:

Ancient-Chinese-Army.jpg

han1.jpg
mbzz.jpg

2012-04-18-132044_1920x1080_scrot.png

Redcliff-conceptart3.jpg


The Imperial Roman Army

r_birdoswald_fort.jpg

roman_army_by_byzantinum.jpg

r_roman_soldiers_with_a_catapult.jpg
 
.
did the two ever even have a war? I think China was busy with Indian, Mongolian invasions.

Btw, the sails on those Junks, what are they made of?
 
.
did the two ever even have a war? I think China was busy with Indian, Mongolian invasions.

It's speculative history. Imagine these two Ancient Superpowers met and had an conflict..
 
.
did the two ever even have a war? I think China was busy with Indian, Mongolian invasions.

Btw, the sails on those Junks, what are they made of?

sorry to say but kings of ancient and medieval india never ventured out of the subcontinent. there was already so much wealth here that they had to fend off foreign, savaging beggars for over a thousand years. the exception being south Indian influence in SE Asia, but that was more cultural than militaristic.
 
.
It's speculative history. Imagine these two Ancient Superpowers met and had an conflict..

there was a really detailed article posted here before i think, with the entire economy calculated as well as production of every resource - cant find the link :P (but no point of posting htat, obviously superior white race won)
 
.
Would have been interesting. China under her first emperor Qin Shi Huang with his crossbow equipped army vs the legions of the Roman Republic just fresh from the battles with Carthage during the second Punic War.
 
.
Iran was fighting the romans on behalf of the so called Han Chinese , nice thread bro , have a nice day
 
.
Depends on which period of "Roman Empire" go against which period of "Chinese Han empire"

But anyway the Chinese should be thankful that they never met the Roman.
 
.
The Romans, of course. Who can deny the superiority of the white race? The white race , if you observe history, has been the conquerors and everyone else, subjected peoples.

Look at India. Such a massive land, yet subjected to the superiority of English strategy and power.

Rome would have humbled any asiatic. Rome collapsed only due to the might of the Germanic people, an ethnic group of the white race. Rome did not fall to an asiatic force.

Depends on which period of "Roman Empire" go against which period of "Chinese Han empire"

But anyway the Chinese should be thankful that they never met the Roman.

Quality over quantity, bud.
 
.
The Chinese chariot speaks volumes. In Europe, chariots were already considered out-dated and useless.

Would have been interesting. China under her first emperor Qin Shi Huang with his crossbow equipped army vs the legions of the Roman Republic just fresh from the battles with Carthage during the second Punic War.

Early crossbows had little penetration..Roman armor was far more advanced than Chinese.
 
.
The Chinese chariot speaks volumes. In Europe, chariots were already considered out-dated and useless.


Indeed. Roman cavalry's wedge formations quickly erased the effectiveness of en-masse chariot attacks. The Gaulic tribes, which utilized this tactic, were subdued. Celtic tribes were subdued accordingly in Roman expeditions to Britannia ; many of the celtic armies utilized the archaic chariot charges as the Gauls.
 
.
The Romans, of course. Who can deny the superiority of the white race? The white race , if you observe history, has been the conquerors and everyone else, subjected peoples.

Look at India. Such a massive land, yet subjected to the superiority of English strategy and power.

Rome would have humbled any asiatic. Rome collapsed only due to the might of the Germanic people, an ethnic group of the white race. Rome did not fall to an asiatic force.



Quality over quantity, bud.

:lol: check this guy out
 
.
Indeed. Roman cavalry's wedge formations quickly erased the effectiveness of en-masse chariot attacks. The Gaulic tribes, which utilized this tactic, were subdued. Celtic tribes were subdued accordingly in Roman expeditions to Britannia ; many of the celtic armies utilized the archaic chariot charges as the Gauls.
Mostly, but more heavy infantry than Roman cavalry.
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom