foxbat
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,093
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
It's not hard to read - the policy was strictly on libel. He called IA soldiers, not terrorists.
Even I openly believe, targeting IA in Kashmir is totally fair game since Kashmir is not India and is a disputed territory.
But I say its better to have peace, but agar peace se baat na banay, use the danda or vice versa. Simple. I don't respect the actions of IA one bit in Kashmir where they have been found raping, killing fake encounters, hitting people on the streets and raiding homes and stealing personal property.
They are beyond reprimand.
However I won't allow them to be called anything but IA soldiers in the interest of civil forum debate. That doesn't mean I like them. i.e. IA the institution in Kashmir.
Jo achay log hain IA main who are not involved in these things can get my respect.
I wonder what happened to the comment about Army executing the state policy and its not the army men but the govt that needs to be blamed for army's action if at all..
But anyway, shouldnt the forum policy then read more like
"Enforcing ALL uniformed armies be given their due respect as soldiers except Indian army soldiers in Kashmir"