What's new

Review GSP Status If Pakistan Fails To Persuade Taliban: EU

The European Parliament has asked Pakistan to use its influence on the Taliban government in Kabul to ensure security and stability in the war-torn country, asking the European Union to reconsider the South Asian country’s preferential trade status upon Islamabad’s failure to do so.
This is the second time this year that the European Parliament has warned Islamabad of a review of Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP plus status.
In April, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) had adopted a resolution demanding Islamabad allow freedom for religious minorities and asked the EU to reconsider Pakistan’s GSP plus status.
In a resolution adopted by 536 votes in favour, 96 against and 50 abstentions on Thursday, MEPs deplored the violent Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, calling for more humanitarian aid and a coordinated response to protect those most vulnerable.
Pakistan bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan
The resolution stated that Pakistan’s leadership bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover.
“Recalls that for many years Pakistan provided safe havens for Taliban members, as well as assistance to their security forces; instructs the EEAS to convey to Pakistan’s leadership that it bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan and that it must use its influence on the Taliban to achieve those aims, and to consider if there is reason to immediately review Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP+ status and the benefits that come with it in the light of current events,” reads clause 46 of the resolution on the situation in Afghanistan.
Pakistan has not yet responded to the resolution yet. Foreign Office spokesperson Asim Iftikhar was contacted for comments on the significance of the warning about possible review of Pakistan’s GSP+ status but no response was received till filing of this story.
Speaking to Voicepk.net, former foreign office spokesperson Abdul Basit said the resolution did not bode well for Pakistan’s relationship with the European Union. “Coming soon after the April resolution, Pakistan cannot make a short shift of this second resolution warning of a review of GSP+ status,” Basit said.
France to exploit resolution against Pakistan
He said the exit of Britain from the European Union has weakened Pakistan’s support base in the European Parliament. “As Britain had a population of about two million Pakistan-origin citizens, a significant number of MEPs elected from Britain used to favour Pakistan in times of such resolutions,” he said, adding that support base has eroded with Britain’s exit from the EU.
Since the grant of GSP Plus in 2014, Pakistan’s exports to the European Union have enhanced from 4.54 billion euros in 2013 to 7.50 billion euros in 2020, registering an increase of 65 percent. In March 2020, the EU extended Pakistan’s GSP plus status till 2022. In August, Abdul Razak Dawood, advisor to Prime Minister on Commerce, said the government was trying for a two-year further extension in the preferential trade status, clarifying that there are no threats to Pakistan’s current GSP plus status.
Basit said France would likely use the resolution to build up pressure in revoking Pakistan’s preferential trade status. The loss of GSP plus status will also impact trade relations with Germany, Pakistan’s top trading partner in the EU, he added. He said Indian influence was fast encroaching upon any space left for Pakistan in the European Parliament.
The former senior diplomat also questioned whether Islamabad had that kind of influence with the Taliban leadership in Kabul as imagined in the text of the EU resolution, pointing out that Pakistan has yet to present holistic policy on Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover.
“Pakistan has oscillated between calls for a representative government and a sole Taliban government in Kabul,” Basit pointed out. In his views, Pakistan’s influence on Taliban leadership is limited and not as reminiscent of the previous Taliban government two decades ago.
Strategic advantage for Pakistan, China
According to the resolution, the withdrawal of US and international forces from Afghanistan is a collective failure of Western foreign and security policy and strategy and serious lessons must be drawn for the future. The MEPs also pointed out that the failure could be a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, for Russia.
“Expresses its deep frustration and concern at the ineffectiveness of the US, NATO, the EEAS and the European Union institutions as a whole over a 20-year period in maintaining and funding the Ghani government, in reality corrupt and alien to the people, as well as armed forces that have proven to be ineffective; expresses its concern at the fact that our collective failure in Afghanistan means a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, Russia, without their having provided significant support to and been involved in the development of Afghanistan; recalls that the Afghan authorities were embroiled in political infighting and systemic corruption and were not able to overcome weak governance,” reads the EU resolution.
Engagement with Taliban, but no official recognition
In a statement on the resolution on Afghanistan, the European Parliament acknowledged that operational engagement with the Taliban’s government was needed for logistical and humanitarian matters, in order to provide humanitarian assistance to civilians in need and safe passage for foreign nationals and Afghans willing to leave the country. However, the resolution stressed that conditions have not been met for a political recognition of de facto Taliban rulers who are currently destroying the achievements of the last twenty years.
Special visas for Afghan women
In the resolution, MEPs stressed that most Afghan refugees will seek protection in neighbouring countries. The EU should therefore support those countries and help create humanitarian corridors to provide food aid, water, sanitation, and medication . However, this cannot replace a fully-fledged European asylum and migration policy , which should focus on resettling those most at risk and most vulnerable, and should include a special visa programme for Afghan women seeking protection from the Taliban regime.
Parliament also urged member states to reassess current and recent asylum applications, including rejected applications, underlining that there must be no forced returns to Afghanistan under any circumstances. MEPs called again on the Commission to present a legislative proposal for humanitarian visas and on member states to share responsibility equally in offering protection.
Finally, MEPs stressed in the resolution that the EU needed to reinforce significantly its capacity to act autonomously and to strengthen its defense cooperation by building a genuine European Defense Union.
Pakistan bears responsibility for Afghan security and stability while we squeeze the life out of the Afghan economy and take the country towards collapse. These two-faced hypocrites in Europe. Euro-skepticism is in our interest, and Far-right nationalism in Europe would lead to further disintegration in the EU. A hope for humanity in terms of coming together to overcome parochialism has fallen victim to the same parochialism today.
 
. .
This is why the information war is so important. For at least 15 years these people have been fed anti-Pakistan propaganda, most of which is freshly cherrypicked bullshit. On top of that they don't like Muslims, and TLP's uncontrolled temper tantrum didn't help either.
 
.
The European Parliament has asked Pakistan to use its influence on the Taliban government in Kabul to ensure security and stability in the war-torn country, asking the European Union to reconsider the South Asian country’s preferential trade status upon Islamabad’s failure to do so.
This is the second time this year that the European Parliament has warned Islamabad of a review of Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP plus status.
In April, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) had adopted a resolution demanding Islamabad allow freedom for religious minorities and asked the EU to reconsider Pakistan’s GSP plus status.
In a resolution adopted by 536 votes in favour, 96 against and 50 abstentions on Thursday, MEPs deplored the violent Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, calling for more humanitarian aid and a coordinated response to protect those most vulnerable.
Pakistan bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan
The resolution stated that Pakistan’s leadership bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover.
“Recalls that for many years Pakistan provided safe havens for Taliban members, as well as assistance to their security forces; instructs the EEAS to convey to Pakistan’s leadership that it bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan and that it must use its influence on the Taliban to achieve those aims, and to consider if there is reason to immediately review Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP+ status and the benefits that come with it in the light of current events,” reads clause 46 of the resolution on the situation in Afghanistan.
Pakistan has not yet responded to the resolution yet. Foreign Office spokesperson Asim Iftikhar was contacted for comments on the significance of the warning about possible review of Pakistan’s GSP+ status but no response was received till filing of this story.
Speaking to Voicepk.net, former foreign office spokesperson Abdul Basit said the resolution did not bode well for Pakistan’s relationship with the European Union. “Coming soon after the April resolution, Pakistan cannot make a short shift of this second resolution warning of a review of GSP+ status,” Basit said.
France to exploit resolution against Pakistan
He said the exit of Britain from the European Union has weakened Pakistan’s support base in the European Parliament. “As Britain had a population of about two million Pakistan-origin citizens, a significant number of MEPs elected from Britain used to favour Pakistan in times of such resolutions,” he said, adding that support base has eroded with Britain’s exit from the EU.
Since the grant of GSP Plus in 2014, Pakistan’s exports to the European Union have enhanced from 4.54 billion euros in 2013 to 7.50 billion euros in 2020, registering an increase of 65 percent. In March 2020, the EU extended Pakistan’s GSP plus status till 2022. In August, Abdul Razak Dawood, advisor to Prime Minister on Commerce, said the government was trying for a two-year further extension in the preferential trade status, clarifying that there are no threats to Pakistan’s current GSP plus status.
Basit said France would likely use the resolution to build up pressure in revoking Pakistan’s preferential trade status. The loss of GSP plus status will also impact trade relations with Germany, Pakistan’s top trading partner in the EU, he added. He said Indian influence was fast encroaching upon any space left for Pakistan in the European Parliament.
The former senior diplomat also questioned whether Islamabad had that kind of influence with the Taliban leadership in Kabul as imagined in the text of the EU resolution, pointing out that Pakistan has yet to present holistic policy on Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover.
“Pakistan has oscillated between calls for a representative government and a sole Taliban government in Kabul,” Basit pointed out. In his views, Pakistan’s influence on Taliban leadership is limited and not as reminiscent of the previous Taliban government two decades ago.
Strategic advantage for Pakistan, China
According to the resolution, the withdrawal of US and international forces from Afghanistan is a collective failure of Western foreign and security policy and strategy and serious lessons must be drawn for the future. The MEPs also pointed out that the failure could be a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, for Russia.
“Expresses its deep frustration and concern at the ineffectiveness of the US, NATO, the EEAS and the European Union institutions as a whole over a 20-year period in maintaining and funding the Ghani government, in reality corrupt and alien to the people, as well as armed forces that have proven to be ineffective; expresses its concern at the fact that our collective failure in Afghanistan means a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, Russia, without their having provided significant support to and been involved in the development of Afghanistan; recalls that the Afghan authorities were embroiled in political infighting and systemic corruption and were not able to overcome weak governance,” reads the EU resolution.
Engagement with Taliban, but no official recognition
In a statement on the resolution on Afghanistan, the European Parliament acknowledged that operational engagement with the Taliban’s government was needed for logistical and humanitarian matters, in order to provide humanitarian assistance to civilians in need and safe passage for foreign nationals and Afghans willing to leave the country. However, the resolution stressed that conditions have not been met for a political recognition of de facto Taliban rulers who are currently destroying the achievements of the last twenty years.
Special visas for Afghan women
In the resolution, MEPs stressed that most Afghan refugees will seek protection in neighbouring countries. The EU should therefore support those countries and help create humanitarian corridors to provide food aid, water, sanitation, and medication . However, this cannot replace a fully-fledged European asylum and migration policy , which should focus on resettling those most at risk and most vulnerable, and should include a special visa programme for Afghan women seeking protection from the Taliban regime.
Parliament also urged member states to reassess current and recent asylum applications, including rejected applications, underlining that there must be no forced returns to Afghanistan under any circumstances. MEPs called again on the Commission to present a legislative proposal for humanitarian visas and on member states to share responsibility equally in offering protection.
Finally, MEPs stressed in the resolution that the EU needed to reinforce significantly its capacity to act autonomously and to strengthen its defense cooperation by building a genuine European Defense Union.


EU forgot to add demand for safety, security and well being of Western powers and Indian Navies in the Chinese Pacific theatre from Chinese too.
 
.
I wish Pakistan could be seen as an independent country. I think we messed up the moment Zia agreed to help CIA set up the Taliban in the 70s.

What's interesting is, Afghanistan used us to become a power by invading us and now they are using us again by using our political leverage. Don't we ever learn lessons from history?

During the Hijrat movement in 1920s they robbed and threw out Pakistanis wanting to start a new life.

They didn't recognize the durand line and still dont.

How many more examples do I need to give you, and now your PM is vouching for them on international forums?

Zia agreed with the CIA to form the Taliban? So Zia agreed to help the Afghans despite them not recognizing the durand line as a border? That's just stupidity.

You have an underbelly of people who do not relate with Pakistani values or nationalism and these are cockroaches that are leading you to make bad decisions. Clean your home.

First of all Taliban appeared on the scene in 1994 a whole 7 years after Zia died and long after CIA existed the region and that too as a reaction to the brutal anarchy at play in Afghanistan where warlords had made the lives of Afghans a living hell.

Secondly, Pakistan did cultivate Islamist proxies/leaders back in the 70's in response for Communist take over of Afghan gov't and the existential threat they and their sponsors in Moscow posed to the state of Pakistan. But it all happened in the earlier part of the decade when Zia was still a Major General. Masood and Hikmetyar were recruited and trained by Bhutto's right hand man Gen. Naseerullah Babar, not Zia.

By the time Zia took over in late 70's, situation had deteriorated further in Afghanistan, Soviet Union had invaded with 40 Divisions, assassinated their own proxy ruler Hafizullah Amin and installed another puppet to replace him. Their motorized rifle division made it all the way to Torkham and Chaman borders and came eyeball to eyeball with our lightly armed frontier scouts.

Soviet threat to Pakistan began earlier with the '71 war, they had signed the Treaty of friendship with India, openly and directly supported India both militarily and diplomatically in UN during that war. Plus they were supporting the insurgency in Balochistan. Additionally they also helped India in the Nuclear tests and massive military build up. Their ultimate goal was to bread off Balochistan from Pakistan and get access to Gawadar.

In order to stave off the Soviets, Zia had no choice but to coax CIA/Americans to back us in our fight against the Soviets.
 
.
So Pakistan is held to account if another country doesn't do the EU's bidding?

How about sanctioning Poland if Belarus misbehaves?
 
.
Imran is to blame for this. Had he not got involved himself in the whole France row, none of it would have happened. Imran tries to play a role that doesn't fit his shoes. Pakistan is a small state (economically, politically) which should keep its head down and work for betterment of it's people and not worry itself of the worldly affairs. I am pretty sure majority of Pakistanis and its leadership are just headstrong to take this advise.
 
.
Imran is to blame for this. Had he not got involved himself in the whole France row, none of it would have happened. Imran tries to play a role that doesn't fit his shoes. Pakistan is a small state (economically, politically) which should keep its head down and work for betterment of it's people and not worry itself of the worldly affairs. I am pretty sure majority of Pakistanis and its leadership are just headstrong to take this advise.
So why are you giving it?
Are you that free?
 
. .
Truth needs to be told. lol.
You said advice not truth

You only give advice to interested party, you yourself said they're not interested
So why are you wasting your time by giving advice to people who don't wanna hear from you?...
 
.
These bastards couldn't do that in 20 years with the worlds strongest military power while they had a free hand to kill anyone without any accountability, now they want us to do it just by talking. why are they so dumb?




The European Parliament has asked Pakistan to use its influence on the Taliban government in Kabul to ensure security and stability in the war-torn country, asking the European Union to reconsider the South Asian country’s preferential trade status upon Islamabad’s failure to do so.
This is the second time this year that the European Parliament has warned Islamabad of a review of Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP plus status.
In April, members of the European Parliament (MEPs) had adopted a resolution demanding Islamabad allow freedom for religious minorities and asked the EU to reconsider Pakistan’s GSP plus status.
In a resolution adopted by 536 votes in favour, 96 against and 50 abstentions on Thursday, MEPs deplored the violent Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, calling for more humanitarian aid and a coordinated response to protect those most vulnerable.
Pakistan bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan
The resolution stated that Pakistan’s leadership bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover.
“Recalls that for many years Pakistan provided safe havens for Taliban members, as well as assistance to their security forces; instructs the EEAS to convey to Pakistan’s leadership that it bears responsibility for security and stability in Afghanistan and that it must use its influence on the Taliban to achieve those aims, and to consider if there is reason to immediately review Pakistan’s eligibility for GSP+ status and the benefits that come with it in the light of current events,” reads clause 46 of the resolution on the situation in Afghanistan.
Pakistan has not yet responded to the resolution yet. Foreign Office spokesperson Asim Iftikhar was contacted for comments on the significance of the warning about possible review of Pakistan’s GSP+ status but no response was received till filing of this story.
Speaking to Voicepk.net, former foreign office spokesperson Abdul Basit said the resolution did not bode well for Pakistan’s relationship with the European Union. “Coming soon after the April resolution, Pakistan cannot make a short shift of this second resolution warning of a review of GSP+ status,” Basit said.
France to exploit resolution against Pakistan
He said the exit of Britain from the European Union has weakened Pakistan’s support base in the European Parliament. “As Britain had a population of about two million Pakistan-origin citizens, a significant number of MEPs elected from Britain used to favour Pakistan in times of such resolutions,” he said, adding that support base has eroded with Britain’s exit from the EU.
Since the grant of GSP Plus in 2014, Pakistan’s exports to the European Union have enhanced from 4.54 billion euros in 2013 to 7.50 billion euros in 2020, registering an increase of 65 percent. In March 2020, the EU extended Pakistan’s GSP plus status till 2022. In August, Abdul Razak Dawood, advisor to Prime Minister on Commerce, said the government was trying for a two-year further extension in the preferential trade status, clarifying that there are no threats to Pakistan’s current GSP plus status.
Basit said France would likely use the resolution to build up pressure in revoking Pakistan’s preferential trade status. The loss of GSP plus status will also impact trade relations with Germany, Pakistan’s top trading partner in the EU, he added. He said Indian influence was fast encroaching upon any space left for Pakistan in the European Parliament.
The former senior diplomat also questioned whether Islamabad had that kind of influence with the Taliban leadership in Kabul as imagined in the text of the EU resolution, pointing out that Pakistan has yet to present holistic policy on Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover.
“Pakistan has oscillated between calls for a representative government and a sole Taliban government in Kabul,” Basit pointed out. In his views, Pakistan’s influence on Taliban leadership is limited and not as reminiscent of the previous Taliban government two decades ago.
Strategic advantage for Pakistan, China
According to the resolution, the withdrawal of US and international forces from Afghanistan is a collective failure of Western foreign and security policy and strategy and serious lessons must be drawn for the future. The MEPs also pointed out that the failure could be a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, for Russia.
“Expresses its deep frustration and concern at the ineffectiveness of the US, NATO, the EEAS and the European Union institutions as a whole over a 20-year period in maintaining and funding the Ghani government, in reality corrupt and alien to the people, as well as armed forces that have proven to be ineffective; expresses its concern at the fact that our collective failure in Afghanistan means a strategic advantage for non-Western powers and neighbouring countries, notably Pakistan, as well as China and, to a lesser extent, Russia, without their having provided significant support to and been involved in the development of Afghanistan; recalls that the Afghan authorities were embroiled in political infighting and systemic corruption and were not able to overcome weak governance,” reads the EU resolution.
Engagement with Taliban, but no official recognition
In a statement on the resolution on Afghanistan, the European Parliament acknowledged that operational engagement with the Taliban’s government was needed for logistical and humanitarian matters, in order to provide humanitarian assistance to civilians in need and safe passage for foreign nationals and Afghans willing to leave the country. However, the resolution stressed that conditions have not been met for a political recognition of de facto Taliban rulers who are currently destroying the achievements of the last twenty years.
Special visas for Afghan women
In the resolution, MEPs stressed that most Afghan refugees will seek protection in neighbouring countries. The EU should therefore support those countries and help create humanitarian corridors to provide food aid, water, sanitation, and medication . However, this cannot replace a fully-fledged European asylum and migration policy , which should focus on resettling those most at risk and most vulnerable, and should include a special visa programme for Afghan women seeking protection from the Taliban regime.
Parliament also urged member states to reassess current and recent asylum applications, including rejected applications, underlining that there must be no forced returns to Afghanistan under any circumstances. MEPs called again on the Commission to present a legislative proposal for humanitarian visas and on member states to share responsibility equally in offering protection.
Finally, MEPs stressed in the resolution that the EU needed to reinforce significantly its capacity to act autonomously and to strengthen its defense cooperation by building a genuine European Defense Union.
 
.
Look at these as*holes! When they needed us just last 2 weeks, they were calling PM and FM. They even had no issues PIA evacuating them from Kabul. The same PIA that is banned to fly to EU.

Now this! How can we convince Taliban? Taliban have won a war against NATO and USA. They have every right to celebrate their victory. Its EU grudge and their ego has been hurt after their humiliating loss. Its this reason they put up such ridiculous conditions.
I understand the economic impact on Pakistan. But I am pointing to differences in interests of EU and US. Both EU and US are asking for specific things from Pakistan. US seems to be taking an idealistic approach where as EUs demands are in line with what Pakistan actually wants, and I don’t see any mention of govt recognition.
So in short:
EU demands are pragmatic from Pakistans perspective and may even support (or not oppose) the eventual acceptance of Taliban govt (how can you ensure stability without dealing with the actual govt)
US wants HR gains to be preserved along with ensuring Afghan soil is not used for terrorism again.
Now for greater responsibilities you kind of need greater power too …

USA wants to ensure human rights! Thats right! Its the same USA and its allies which were killing Afghans as war trophies. In some instances, they killed Afghans for the first blood and collected severed fingers of the deceased.

Human rights are a weapon. When US talks about it, its hypocrisy and is a mere foreign policy tool.
 
Last edited:
.
Afghanistan is not part of Pakistan , EU should realize , we helped only with outcome of stability now it is up to Afghanistani residents to handle their own territory

Have a little trust in process
 
.
According to EU, can Pakistan use its relations with EU to persuade EU to speak against India sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan? No? Then we see what the problem with this argument is.
 
.
Thora waqt reh gya hai
We will bleed and hurt for a little bit.
Then the tides will begin to change very soon in this War on Muslims.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom