What's new

Reuters report exposes Indian claims of major destruction

This was not a winner - loser situation

From Indian's stand point
  • India claimed victory and destruction of JuD camps - they are not there. Bombs dropped in trees.
  • India has offended Pakistan without a gain for itself.
From Pakistan's stand point
  • Pakistan has not lost anything to India
  • Pakistan is already justified to conduct an operation against the state of India.
Modi tried to win election, but looks like he will lose with bigger margin now as truth will be open soon. Pakistan was not and is not involved in Pulwama but India has taken burden of breaking into Pakistan for free.

Who's the loser? ;)
 
. .
something isnt right


crash or shot down ?

D0Y0wZHUUAAhjyF.jpg
 
.
From Indian's stand point
  • India claimed victory and destruction of JuD camps - they are not there. Bombs dropped in trees.
  • India has offended Pakistan without a gain for itself.
From Pakistan's stand point
  • Pakistan has not lost anything to India
  • Pakistan is already justified to conduct an operation against the state of India.
Modi tried to win election, but looks like he will lose with bigger margin now as truth will be open soon. Pakistan was not and is not involved in Pulwama but India has taken burden of breaking into Pakistan for free.

Who's the loser? ;)

Once again it was not a Win - Lose affair

As regards No of deaths , presence of camps etc , when has Pak ever admitted any of its misdemeanours that it will now. Even after Abbotabad the default response was denial & so has it remained for everything. Hence no issue here.

It was a statement of intent & demonstration of ability

If even now after the incursion it is felt that Pak has not lost anything - the default response is showing or maybe loss of face means nothing
 
. . .
Once again it was not a Win - Lose affair

As regards No of deaths , presence of camps etc , when has Pak ever admitted any of its misdemeanours that it will now. Even after Abbotabad the default response was denial & so has it remained for everything. Hence no issue here.

It was a statement of intent & demonstration of ability

If even now after the incursion it is felt that Pak has not lost anything - the default response is showing or maybe loss of face means nothing

Death or no deaths, India has admitted responsibility of 300 deaths on Pakistan side. That actually means India as permitted to kill 300 Indian souls in an equalising strike back on Indian territory. India gave Pakistan a permit to kill 300 Indians - a big stupid call by India.

Wait for promised retaliation - why are you crying.
 
.
PLA generals and intl agencies are doing jobs on monitoring the weak indian army actions!
No country on this planet can defeat PLA ,well who did right?!
 
. .
India was and is still a slave living under UK empire shadow and would still will be in the next 50 to 100 years!
 
. . .
Shot down!
This would be really breaking news of it was shot down.

PAK air force can handle it well.that is somekind of exchange of fires i am talking about!
Bro, you're not getting it. IAF retaliated because of the Pulwama attack where 40 or so Indian soldiers died.
IAF sent their planes deep inside Pakistan territory and not Azad Kashmir. Dropped payload and claimed 300 or more killed. Please read up.
 
.
This would be really breaking news of it was shot down.


Bro, you're not getting it. IAF retaliated because of the Pulwama attack where 40 or so Indian soldiers died.
IAF sent their planes deep inside Pakistan territory and not Azad Kashmir. Dropped payload and claimed 300 or more killed. Please read up.

This is bullshit. They never killed 300 people, a sensational story concocted by the Indian Govt for election purposes. Furthermore, they weren't deep inside Pakistan's territory, they dropped a payload bomb because the F-16 had a lock on the target and the Mirage would have been toast if it didn't reduce its weight. Something similar was seen in Afghanistan. The American B-52 released its payload because it didn't want to crash in the airport with missiles on board. Therefore, they released the bombs in open space, unfortunately, those same bombs landed 50-60 miles on a village that destroyed it completely. Besides they bombed a couple of trees...great professionalism by IAF. Pakistan will now respond in kind as this is the first time a bomb has landed since 1971. Already a Mig has fallen in Kashmir.
 
.
This would be really breaking news of it was shot down.


Bro, you're not getting it. IAF retaliated because of the Pulwama attack where 40 or so Indian soldiers died.
IAF sent their planes deep inside Pakistan territory and not Azad Kashmir. Dropped payload and claimed 300 or more killed. Please read up.
That is a decision need to be made by XI,unfortunately there is no military base of PLA in PAK.
You and me do not and can not make any difference here.
It is not PAK army killed the 40,but India assume it is and say it is,so it must be is?
Sounds like massive destruction weapons of iraqi saddam!
Modi want to win election again,drop imaginatin and fight and win!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom