Response to strike from Pak will be very heavy: IAF chief

[RockyX]

Lack of maturity & responsibility, India should spend money for providing extra qualifications to top officials. IAF chief should realize that, he is not hosting STAR PLUS or ZEE TV program.

He didn't said anything wrong.

If someone will ask your PAF chief. What you will do If India will attack with Nuke ?? He would reply same. Isn't it ??

 

[DV RULES]

india have answer from nasr to bla bla.....
and pakistan will be the first country to nuke its own soil
economics went wrong

Retaliation from Pakistani side in case of Indian active aggression will not call as first use or will not cross threshold of no first use policy.

 

[Strigon]

He didn't said anything wrong.

If someone will ask your PAF chief. What you will do If India will attack with Nuke ?? He would reply same. Isn't it ??

No you are wrong. PAF chief will only authorize candy drops on India...(Sarcasm) Its something you don't say, its understood. People need to be responsible for what they say especially top officials.

But then again...news like this from Indian side is an everyday thing. I'm actually surprised this thread got 5 pages and counting.

 

[Malik Usman]

There was no need to give any statement agout Pakistani missile tests "Nasar" or anyother experiments as they are going in routine and same as Indian also experimenting new tests.............one thing is abvious in this.....its seem like these Pakistani experiments distrube the IAF and raise tensions between them.

 

[DV RULES]

It does. Any nuclear strike against Indian Army troops anywhere constitutes a 'nuclear strike'. And that in itself crosses the 'threshold'. And that is enough for a retaliation in kind, albeit a massive one. And that means denial of any second strike capability, whatsoever. That being said, only an utterly deranged fool would use nuclear weapons on his own soil.

No first use policy adopted by India but not by Pakistan, Pakistan's answer by any conventional or nuclear weapon will not provoke India's No first use policy even if India will make any step against Pakistan.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

limited N war,2 front war, deep strikes.heavy response = retarded nutjob.....Indian chiefs r loco... retarded warmongers..

 

[Bang Galore]

No first use policy adopted by India but not by Pakistan, Pakistan's answer by any conventional or nuclear weapon will not provoke India's No first use policy even if India will make any step against Pakistan.

Pakistan's use of nuclear weapons against Indian assets will constitute a first use. Indian policy could not be clearer.

 

[alizahid]

Well then, Cold Start will lead to an all-out nuclear war on the subcontinent.

True that my friend! Thats why its called the cold start buster. the tactic weapon did its job of neutralizing cold start strategy. this point my friend is enough to close the discussion.

 

[alizahid]

well if pakistan was to use its nuclear weapons against india, it wont send a single missile and wait for 20 to come back its way. its gonna send as many and cause as much damage it possibly can by in the first place. everything is in range so you can imagine what they'll wanna hit.

 

[karan.1970]

PAF Air Chief Marshall Rao Qamar Suleman expected to give a counter statement soon.

Guess then we will be able to call him an idiot too.. Like some above called the Indian Air chief

 

[karan.1970]

If Pakistan used a Nasr tactical nuclear weapon, on an Indian column advancing into Pakistani territory (Cold start for example), India would not respond with nuclear weapons.

Because that would risk escalating it into a full-blown nuclear war. Which would destroy everything that India has managed to achieve in the past few decades.

War itself is a result of the failure of sane logic. So once it begins, assuming sane thinking during the adrenaline driven decisioning process is insane ..

I think any nuclear attack.. Tactical or not will remove the tollgate from the No 1st use policy of India. And thats what ACM seems to be saying..

 

[PoKeMon]

If Pakistan used a Nasr tactical nuclear weapon, on an Indian column advancing into Pakistani territory (Cold start for example), India would not respond with nuclear weapons.

Because that would risk escalating it into a full-blown nuclear war. Which would destroy everything that India has managed to achieve in the past few decades.

What make you think Pakistan will use tactical nukes on indian army even if they are made very clear of massive indian nuclear retaliation???

You are over estimating the bravado of pakistan. They do fear of dying and they do love their families.

 

[RockyX]

well if pakistan was to use its nuclear weapons against india, it wont send a single missile and wait for 20 to come back its way. its gonna send as many and cause as much damage it possibly can by in the first place. everything is in range so you can imagine what they'll wanna hit.

SAM/ABM can detect and Kill 100 of Such Missiles at any given of time. Preparation is done by thinking of worst case scenario, In Defence Strategy.

Read More......to know more about it.

 

[Areesh]

SAM/ABM can detect and Kill 100 of Such Missiles at any given of time. Preparation is done by thinking of worst case scenario, In Defence Strategy.

Read More......to know more about it.

Bold and very much stupid claim buddy. As someone else said on this forum theoretically they are claimed to do this but what will happen practically is something else. Don't overdo with fanboyism.

 

[Psyxjen]

Nothing offensive intended, but why does it seem that any effort by India's two largest neighbours to bolster their capabilities, (without labelling a 'meant for India' sticker) puts the Indian Military chiefs in a state of obstinate defensiveness? (similar to that when a child feels subdued) Atleast, that's what's reflected by their statements...