What's new

"Resistance 2.0." - Battle for Panjshir begins - Taliban claims victory

.
if true than bad development... he should have died there!
He will be insignificant if the world starts recognising new Afghan Government… but yeah it means the war in Afghanistan is not over yet…
 
. . . . .
Bhai.
It is not the fact that the army has never governed well. In fact Pakistan has seen a lot of stability under army rule. There have been 2 major problems. The army has with the exception of Bhutto not carried out a sweep and culling of thieves like Zardari and Ganja shareef and in its own ranks. This has allowed the same old faces to wash away their sins and come in with a cleaner image. This is what has harmed the politics more than anything else.
Under a political government public decides the fate of crooks like Zardari and Nawaz Shareef but it needs someone at the top to be efficient at running affairs.
As to the role of Army anywhere in the world including in India it is a pressure group. Just like any pressure group it has its own perceptions regarding where money should be spent. The deep state in the US is a combination of the armed forces defence intelligence agencies and defence conglomerate. Pakisgan does not have that but the army still wants to "manage" affairs in the background. This is true for many other countries in the world.
A
Nawaz and zardari both propped up by army
Army itself is corrupt
 
. .
So Saleh and the Panjshir Pappu managed to escape. Not a surprise there. A helicopter was ready for them all the time. But disappointed that Tajikistan is hosting such losers. Going forward, if Tajikistan wants trade benefits from a new Afghanistan then it should hand these people over to the Taliban govt. These Haramkhors had no chance of winning minus strong external support and should have known that several days ago. But they slaughtered a lot of theirs and Taliban lives for some unachievable 'glory'. HARAMKHORS have blood on their hands!!!
 
. .
Bhai.
It is not the fact that the army has never governed well. In fact Pakistan has seen a lot of stability under army rule. There have been 2 major problems. The army has with the exception of Bhutto not carried out a sweep and culling of thieves like Zardari and Ganja shareef and in its own ranks. This has allowed the same old faces to wash away their sins and come in with a cleaner image. This is what has harmed the politics more than anything else.
Under a political government public decides the fate of crooks like Zardari and Nawaz Shareef but it needs someone at the top to be efficient at running affairs.
As to the role of Army anywhere in the world including in India it is a pressure group. Just like any pressure group it has its own perceptions regarding where money should be spent. The deep state in the US is a combination of the armed forces defence intelligence agencies and defence conglomerate. Pakisgan does not have that but the army still wants to "manage" affairs in the background. This is true for many other countries in the world.
A

the deep state in USA does not dictate policy. they try to influence in an ad hoc manner. at the end of the day President pulls out of Saigon or Kabul. the deep state goes along. the deep state does not finance politicians or influence politics. prior to 9/11 they could care less about Afghanistan. they are no views on whether abortion is legal, gay marriage is okay, what the top marginal tax bracket is. I think you get the point.

sorry for derailing the thread
 
. . . .
Let there be peace now .. with this rebellion crushed.
I doubt it, the insurgency will move to Tajikistan... There has been alot of retreat by ANA there... It's the next launching pad for India and NA... Heard the french are also taking interest.... Time to force Russia and China into arm twisting Tajikistan.... Before the cowards run to India ( most probably ) or France ( also probable )
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom