Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spot on! It is often that the ASQRs are changed on the whims and fancies of some nut-heads who want the Tejas to possess the technology of the 'Bird of Prey' shown in the sci-fi Star Trek movie!! Jeeeez!IAF resentment over tejas is valid but they should think, they are changing the specs of Lca from time to time.
Look who is talking? has pak ever build anything by themselves
YOU are dumb , you don't know pakistan has copyright for producing terrorist . They have monopoly in this field .
Looks like you are dumber than me..
Why don't you send in some Bisons and we can show you whether JF-17's have BVR's tested or not?
Common sense should prevail here boys.
The LCA Tejas appears to be a failure and hence a combat ready squadron has not been inducted to date.
I don't know why the Indian members here are not mad about how long it take to develop LCA instead of going after the lone Pakistani guy in this thread. Blaming others will never correct your own faults.
Which actually would be a very good comparision, since both fighters would have similar capabilities in BVR. Both fighters are not designed with a priority for a low RCS, both don't have any RAM coatings or less reflecting materials. The missile range of SD10 and older R27, or R77 is comparable, both have radars that can track 10 targets at the same time. The KJ7 should have a range advantage, just like the Russian missiles have over SD10, or R73 offers higher offbore sights and agility over JFTs WVR missiles.
So that comparision would be much closer than you might think!
I mean, since you have absolutely no idea about either Jet.....that's my guess, otherwise you wouldn't have compared the performance parameters of RCS/SD10 and KJ-7 etc.