Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's good actually,we attack them destroy a bunker,for face saving there yogi mogi comes on T.V and tells nation,we have killed x number of Pak Soldiers and Y number of bunkers have been destroyed,waho MODI will teach Pakis a lesson,Indians are happy.
Kasmiri Mujahid din targetting an Indian base destroying it and killing scores,after that security lapse Indians will do a surgikal strike,and then announce a victroy over T.V,public again happy
win-win for both
border is fenced how can Pakistani army enters and mutilate an indian soldier and there were no any other soldier on site to fight with PA and save his colleague.
Now PDF started filtering Indian fake news ??
Nice work.
that country janta still thinks it was no fooled . even though their military and media fooled them yesterday.Which countries military had fooled its public multiple times in the past. Well the history speaks for itself. LOL
that country janta still thinks it was no fooled . even though their military and media fooled them yesterday.
Indian story regarding the beheading has so many holes that even an idiot can pick it up. First they say two men killed in attack on a bunker. Simultaneously they say two killed and mutilated in an ambush. However, only two coffins show up so one of the stories is not true most probably about the ambush. As far as the ambush story is concerned the Indian Army said that the ambush was a quarter of a KM inside Indian controlled territory. They also said that the rest of the patrol ran away and left the two soldiers behind. So basically they are saying that PA conducted a "surgical strike" as per Indian definition of a surgical strike and some real surgery was done on Indian soldiers and that Indian soldiers are basically cowards for leaving their comrades behind to be killed and mutilated by Pakistanis. Not very good for the morale of their soldiers. As for mutilation, if any body has seen pictures of war dead in most cases the bodies are in a very bad shape. This is a normal result of heavy caliber weapons. If Indians cannot accept it they should not play with the big boys. The reality is that most probably they lost a couple of soldiers in a bunker hit most probably same as the one in the recently uploaded video, rest is randi rona.Yeah, and the family of the martyrs are also party in fooling the entire nation, huh ?? I can clearly see who is the real fool here.
http://www.financialexpress.com/ind...n-soldiers-want-from-pm-narendra-modi/650480/
Indian story regarding the beheading has so many holes that even an idiot can pick it up. First they say two men killed in attack on a bunker. Simultaneously they say two killed and mutilated in an ambush. However, only two coffins show up so one of the stories is not true most probably about the ambush. As far as the ambush story is concerned the Indian Army said that the ambush was a quarter of a KM inside Indian controlled territory. They also said that the rest of the patrol ran away and left the two soldiers behind. So basically they are saying that PA conducted a "surgical strike" as per Indian definition of a surgical strike and some real surgery was done on Indian soldiers and that Indian soldiers are basically cowards for leaving their comrades behind to be killed and mutilated by Pakistanis. Not very good for the morale of their soldiers. As for mutilation, if any body has seen pictures of war dead in most cases the bodies are in a very bad shape. This is a normal result of heavy caliber weapons. If Indians cannot accept it they should not play with the big boys. The reality is that most probably they lost a couple of soldiers in a bunker hit most probably same as the one in the recently uploaded video, rest is randi rona.
once again Modi Killed indian soldiers . Aary haan include DovalNo wonder you call him butcher
Your brain has been conditioned to see things this way only.
I thereby see no point in challenging your statement which of course is made by impulse rather than being based on some verifiable sources.
Feeling good by calling IA soldiers cowards huh ?? Then what should one call an entire army who happened to surrender without even giving a decent fight in front of these cowards ?? Sorry, but it's my genuine doubt.