What's new

Replacement of Pakistan Army's G-3 Rifles.

which?


  • Total voters
    87
Status
Not open for further replies.
i would like some more info on type 56 please sir G... what are your sources?? they really need to get rid of that ugly wood finsih...
T 56 is a gud rifel the barral is more sturdy than chinese verson and rate of fire is a little hi just by a few bullets per min but the real change is the stock which is way better than the usual wooden one because not only it folds alst it is angularly parallel to the entire mechanism and thus the blow back creates a motion prependicular to the shoulder than the lean wooden stock which made the angular blow back so it is much better.
 
.
T 56 is a gud rifel the barral is more sturdy than chinese verson and rate of fire is a little hi just by a few bullets per min but the real change is the stock which is way better than the usual wooden one because not only it folds alst it is angularly parallel to the entire mechanism and thus the blow back creates a motion prependicular to the shoulder than the lean wooden stock which made the angular blow back so it is much better.


Well when are the polymer upgraded non wooden type 56 go into production and when will it be seen with our troops on the front lines???
 
.
nothing is concreat now days with the bad economy but yes plans r there and if a new system is not selected than these upgrades wil go in to action.
 
.
Well then what are they waiting for.

PA has already started getting the POF made AK-47s with the folding stock. Kind of Type-56C variant of the Chinese.

But it is heavier than the previous models/Type-56 with wood butt. (whatever u call it :P )
 
.
Any bullpup rifle is better than g3. The compact size allows for easier carrying and greater maneuverability
 
.
Any bullpup rifle is better than g3. The compact size allows for easier carrying and greater maneuverability

Even bullpups firing 9 mm ?

Bull pups are discriminatory against left-handers .... Empty cases are ejected in the face... Exception to that are few such as the


FN-2000

FN_F2000_S.jpg


P-90

FN-P90.PNG
 
.
AK47 is the best and pakistan land forces has it and manufacture it thats the min stay weapon of pakistan no jamming thats the best it can give u m16 and m4a4 and that gets jammed whuch can kill
 
.
Considering the percentage of right handers in the world. Even more in a smaller sample like the pakistan army, bullpup rifles advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Besides why are pakistanis so afraid to change for the better?
 
.
HK417 is a very good choice for PA.
 
.
Even bullpups firing 9 mm ?

Bull pups are discriminatory against left-handers .... Empty cases are ejected in the face... Exception to that are few such as the


FN-2000

FN_F2000_S.jpg


P-90

FN-P90.PNG
You just contridicted ur own statement by posting Fn 2000 . its a forward shell ejection sys tem but yes in general the idea is same Bullpup is not a gud idea
1 low reaction time
2 mor complicated mechanism hard to work with on battle field

---------- Post added at 09:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:31 PM ----------

But it is heavier than the previous models/Type-56 with wood butt. (whatever u call it :P )
how so it was built as an upgrade to the Type 56 the folding stock is not the only change we made actually a designe upgrade wase taken from AK 103 which reduces the snake vibrations and also the firing mechanism was tweaked so far as i have been told.
 
.
how so it was built as an upgrade to the Type 56 the folding stock is not the only change we made actually a designe upgrade wase taken from AK 103 which reduces the snake vibrations and also the firing mechanism was tweaked so far as i have been told.

May be you are rite but heavy weapon not only means more fatigue but also slow reaction time....
 
. . .
An infantry soldier of PA comes from the village mostly. To him it will take some time to get used to the Bullpup, which looks like a water carrier for kids going to school. Bayonet is another issue.
 
.
5.56 means the person you hit aint going to be down after getting hit
its stopping power is lowers
pakistan army is fighting a very determined enemy
if if injured he is going to fight back till death
which means 5.56 aint the best caliber which means 7.62 is better
BESIDE USA AND NATO IS GOING TO SHIFT TOWARDS 6.8MM cause 5.56 AINT GOOD ENOUGH
beside M4 has a serious jamming proble

Excuse ME,

Once you go Colt M4, you never go back to other CQB carbine,
I shot more then 5000 rounds and not a single jam, its 4500$
well worth.
Second, it depend on the bullet, as a range/target shooter i found
JHP is BETTER the FMJ to do MORE damage and last but not least
there are people you cant down even you hit with 7.62 with FMJ
in compare to NATO SHP or FMJHP, please live in reality instead of
reading/pasting other posts.

Regards,
Zshan Durrani.:pakistan:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom