What's new

Remittances From Pakistani Diaspora Soared 21X Since Year 2000

RiazHaq

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
6,611
Reaction score
70
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
http://www.riazhaq.com/2018/12/remittances-from-pakistani-diaspora.html

Remittance inflows from Pakistani diaspora have jumped 21-fold from about $1 billion in year 2000 to $21 billion in 2018, according to the World Bank. In terms of GDP, these inflows have soared nearly 7X from about 1% in year 2000 to 6.9% of GDP in 2018.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's exports have declined from 13.5% of GDP in year 2000 to 8.24% of GDP in 2017. At the same time, the country's import bill has increased from 14.69% in year 2000 to 17.55% of GDP in 2017. This growing trade imbalance has forced Pakistan to seek IMF bailouts four times since the year 2000. It is further complicated by external debt service cost of over $6 billion (about 2% of GDP) in 2017. Foreign investment in the country has declined from a peak of $5.59 billion (about 4% of GDP) in 2007 to a mere $2.82 billion (less than 1% of GDP) in 2017. While the current account imbalance situation is bad, it would be far worse if Pakistani diaspora did not come to the rescue.

Diaspora Remittances:

Estimated inflows of $20.9 billion make Pakistan the world's 7th largest recipient of remittances for 2018, according data released by the World Bank in its latest "Migration and Remittances" report of December 2018. In South Asia region, Pakistan is the second largest recipient of remittances of $20.9 billion after top-ranked India's $79.5 billion.


Pakistan Remittances in Millions of US Dollars. Source: World Bank

Remittances from Pakistani diaspora have grown nearly 21-fold since the year 2000. Pakistanis sent home remittances adding up to 6.9% of the country's GDP in 2018, up from 1% back in year 2000.

Pakistan's Trade:

In 2017, Pakistan exported goods and services worth $25 billion while it importsamounted to $54 billion, a trade deficit of $29 billion for the year. This is a dramatic deterioration from about $2 billion trade deficit (2% of GDP) in year 2000 to $35 billion trade deficit (11% of GDP) in year 2017.


Pakistan Trade Deficit in Billions of US$. Source: World Bank


Pakistan's exports have declined from 13.5% of GDP in year 2000 to 8.24% of GDP in 2017. At the same time, the country's import bill has increased from 14.69% in year 2000 to 17.55% of GDP in 2017.


Pakistan FDI. Source: The Global Economy


Foreign Direct Investment:

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in Pakistan was a mere $2.82 billion (less than 1% of GDP) in 2017, down from a peak of $5.59 billion (4% of GDP) in 2007. The lack of foreign investment has contributed to the country's dwindling reserves and balance of payments difficulties requiring it to seek yet another IMF bailout.


Pakistan's External Debt. Source: State Bank of Pakistan via Dr. Ishrat Husain

Pakistan's Debt:

Significant growth in remittances from Pakistani diaspora has clearly helped but the external accounts gap is too big for it. This has forced Pakistan to borrow heavily in recent years. It has raised debt service costs and put pressure on Pakistan's reserves.

Summary:

Remittances from Pakistani diaspora have jumped 21-fold from about $1 billion in year 2000 to $21 billion in 2018, according to the World Bank. In terms of GDP, these inflows have soared nearly 7X from about 1% in year 2000 to 6.9% of GDP in 2018. Meanwhile, Pakistan's exports have declined from 13.5% of GDP in year 2000 to 8.24% of GDP in 2017. Foreign investment in the country has declined from a peak of $5.59 billion (about 4% of GDP) in 2007 to a mere $2.82 billion (less than 1% of GDP) in 2017. At the same time, the country's import bill has increased from 14.69% in year 2000 to 17.55% of GDP in 2017. This growing trade imbalance has forced Pakistan to seek IMF bailouts four times since the year 2000. It is further complicated by external debt service cost of over $6 billion (about 2% of GDP) in 2017. While the current account imbalance situation is bad, it would be far worse if Pakistani diaspora did not come to the rescue.

Related Links:

Haq's Musings

South Asia Investor Review

Can Pakistan Avoid Recurring Balance of Payment Crisis?

Pakistan Economy Hobbled By Underinvestment

Pakistan's IT Exports Surging

Can Indian Economy Survive Without Western Capital Inflows?

Pakistan-China-Russia Vs India-Japan-US

Chinese Yuan to Replace US $ as Reserve Currency?

Remittances From Overseas Pakistanis

Can Imran Khan Lead Pakistan to the Next Level?

China to Expand Manufacturing in Special Economic Zones

http://www.riazhaq.com/2018/12/remittances-from-pakistani-diaspora.html
 
.
Pakistani diaspora seems to be more patriotic than Indian diaspora.
 
.
Govt. of Pakistan do not respect overseas Pakistanis and charge them tax on income, which they have earned abroad, which is day light stealing.
 
.
I expect the new government under the leadership of IK to spend every cent on the well-being of the people all across Pakistan. The previous governments were like ugly leeches sucking all the money including remittances of overseas Pakistanis into their accounts. Where is he that imbecile Ishaq Dar? Hiding somewhere in London? Majority of overseas Pakistanis have full confidence in IK. He must make it count.
 
. .
Musharraf planted the seed and today we are eating the fruit.
bas kerday bhai....kon sa seed.....kon sa fruit? har cheez mein Pervez Musharraf. Chor gaya tha do pilay eik Nawaz or dosra Benazir. All this illegal encroachment started because of him. His tenure was a case study in development economics. I thought it was bullshit until he wrote in his book that he took a course in it during this Army days.
 
. . . . .
Remittances are not donations. The expatriates send money to their families back home and not to the Govt.

Bhai we don't need anything bas itna kardo hamein Passport aur ID card renew kartay Zaleel na kia karo . Yeh to kar saktay ho na.
 
.
Remittances are not donations. The expatriates send money to their families back home and not to the Govt.

The same is true for Pakistan, Mexico and other countries too. It is a shame that in spite of Indian diaspora being one of the richer communities they send so meager money back to India for family expenses or investments back in India.

It stood at 80 billion US dollars... plus it has nothing to do with PATRIOTISM...

https://www.livemint.com/Industry/k...p-spot-in-remittances-with-80-bn-World-B.html

I know that but Indians are richer and are more in numbers. If you look at per capita and richness Index, it should be around 200 Billion USD.
 
.
The same is true for Pakistan, Mexico and other countries too. It is a shame that in spite of Indian diaspora being one of the richer communities they send so meager money back to India for family expenses or investments back in India.



I know that but Indians are richer and are more in numbers. If you look at per capita and richness Index, it should be around 200 Billion USD.

Might be because there families in India are rich too and don't need support from their NRI family members.
 
.
Might be because there families in India are rich too and don't need support from their NRI family members.

Even if that was true, which is not the case (most of them are from the middle income families), they can still send money to invest in Indian stocks, Indian real estate and Indian Businesses. But they spend and invest most of their earnings in the countries they live in rather than send them back to India.
 
.
The same is true for Pakistan, Mexico and other countries too. It is a shame that in spite of Indian diaspora being one of the richer communities they send so meager money back to India for family expenses or investments back in India.



I know that but Indians are richer and are more in numbers. If you look at per capita and richness Index, it should be around 200 Billion USD.

I cannot argue with you on this point... but you need to understand that India is not asking them like Pakistan... most of the talented young people left India because they feel that reservation system hampered their growth and they don't want the same for their children... this is true for my 3 cousins...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom